jay_a2j wrote:FabledIntegral wrote:
1. How should Eve have known to not eat from the tree of knowledge if she had no knowledge of good/evil or right/wrong? Is God now blaming Eve for something Eve could not have possibly known in the first place? If you don't know right/wrong, then how can you know disobeying God is wrong?
God told Adam and Eve to eat from all the trees in the garden BUT the tree of knowledge. They disobeyed God. I guess they found out disobeying God was wrong.... the hard way.
So basically you have no answer? "I guess they found it out it was wrong in the end." You never addressed how they were supposed to know if the first place with no knowledge of good nor evil. You hear one thing from one being, God, one thing from another, the serpent.
jay_a2j wrote:2. You're still missing the initial point. Even though Eve may have had freewill, God created Eve knowing that should would make the choice to choose the apple. Let me make another scenario for you. Suddenly you are granted with the power to give thought/personality to a robot. You make the robot curious. You know ahead of time that the robot, because it is curious, will take apart your house to examine it, which you don't want to happen. How do you know? You simply do, you have the power of knowing. However, it is NOT you who CAUSES the robot to take apart your house - it does it by its own curious nature, even though you tell it not to. Are you going to punish that robot that YOU made and DESIGNED to be curious in the first place? You knew beforehand that because you created it with a curious personality that it would take apart your house, but you did it anyways, and now you're punishing the robot for it!
I hope you don't use the same logic for raising children. You knew that children sometimes misbehave, so how can YOU punish them when they do?
Huge difference with children. There's a huge factor in knowing before creating what's going to happen. If I had prior knowledge knowing that God was real and that if I had a child he would be condemned to eternity, I would
not have that child merely to save him from being damned (assuming I brought up an atheist). Prior knowledge is what is significant in this argument - I did not create my children purposely with a natural tendency to misbehave. However, if I raised my child and it developed a mischievous personality due to copying my own behavior, it would make me a poor parent, even if what we were doing is wrong. So just as we may truly be sinning according to God's standards, he still created us with the tendency to sin (and you can't use the argument that God is a perfect example for us to follow simply because I had to try use an analogy to what you are describing).
jay_a2j wrote:3. Eve was coaxed into eating the fruit by the serpent - how was she to know that God was right and the serpent was wrong?
My guess is that God created her and the serpent didn't?
The hell does that mean? Are you going to trust your parents over every other source? They created you. Once again, with no knowledge of good or evil, you just admitted you have no argument. A guess, yet a very poor one at that.
4. How is it just that God makes US pay for the sins of what Adam/Eve did? So you're saying that I could be living in paradise if OTHERS didn't f*ck up? And God instead, because some others fucked up, I'm at risk of eternal damnation and have to live with the suffering and tragedies in this world? Hardly!
Oh, I'm sure you have enough sin racked up all by yourself to warrant eternal damnation, we all do.
[/quote]
According to you, or the Bible, I only have racked up this sin all by myself BECAUSE of what Eve did. If Eve didn't f*ck up, I wouldn't have any sin to accumulate, now would I?
jay_a2j wrote:5. Personally, I'd tell God to shove it up his ass if he expects me to be sorry for something I didn't do myself.
You should really watch what you say, He can hear you, ya know.

Then he also hears my mutter of "God damn it" when the CC dice gods dislike me.
jay_a2j wrote:6. It's sin according to his standards. For all I know there's nothing morally wrong with homosexuality, with having more than one lover, sex before marriage, etc.
Aaaah, this is a beauty! This boils down to if absolute "right" and "wrong" exist. If they don't exist than NOTHING is wrong (rape, murder, incest, etc.) If it does exist, where did it come from? I'll spell it backwards for you "DOG". It doesn't matter what WE consider sin. God is the final authority.
Agreed. There is no absolute right nor absolute wrong. Nothing matters - rape, murder... we're all rotting. The ends justify the means eh?

Of course God is the final authority... haha when you can't think of ANY good reason yourself it's because "well he's all powerful he decides I don't know why but I'm not going to try and figure it out myself! Yeahhhh blind faith!!!"
I'm going to leave incest out because since when is that an absolute wrong? Hardly - it's only according to your religion really that it's considered a "wrong," and what society today has built upon it (and trust me, what society has built up has made it disgust me as much as it might disgust you, but the fact you would consider it an absolute wrong is laughable). Many ancient civilizations such as the Romans and Greeks had many incestuous encounters in their daily lives. But once again way to try to make you're own paradigm sound like it's the truth of matters.