Conquer Club

A question for people who are into debating religion.

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: A question for people who are into debating religion.

Postby Haggis_McMutton on Sun Jul 27, 2008 11:51 am

DaGip wrote:
polarbeast23 wrote:
tiberiusaquila wrote:A Deist maintains that a supreme God created the universe but does not rule it or oversee it, therefore there is no religion attached to that deity.

Then this is what I am.


Nah...you ain't a Deist. You are an Iswasatist.

You believe in the great Iswasat, the all powerful Uber Entity of the entire cosmos.

The Iswasat can be broken down into three specific entities (much like the Christian Trinity). The IS, which is your present manifest reality. The WAS, which is your past manifested reality. And, the AT, which is your future manifesting realities. All three of these concepts merge into one eternal quantum now and become the Great Iswasat.

And from the Iswasat sprang a small reflection of itself in the form of a particle consisting of three inherent principles: Vacuum, Impulse, and Parallel Force. Or better known as the Very Important Particle (or VIP for short).

These VIPs emerge faster than our human perspective of light, and therefore, are able to exist in multiple locations all at the same time without even leaving their position (which would be at the point of the Big Bang, which wasn't a BANG but a simple twinkling of energy reflected upon itself--called quantum feedback).

The process of existence occurs within an instant of expansion and contraction of these VIPs. We actually exist BOTH within a huge Black Hole and White Hole at the same time!

The Iswasat reins SUPREME!!!!


Ah, so this is how a new religion is born.

Hmm, you know, if we get in on this early there might be big bucks to be made here.

All, hail the almighty Iswasat (wait, does it like to be praised? )
Highest score: 3063; Highest position: 67;
Winner of {World War II tournament, -team 2010 Skilled Diversity, [FuN||Chewy]-[XII] USA};
8-3-7
User avatar
Major Haggis_McMutton
 
Posts: 403
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:32 am

Re: A question for people who are into debating religion.

Postby mandalorian2298 on Sun Jul 27, 2008 12:06 pm

tiberiusaquila wrote:A Deist maintains that a supreme God created the universe but does not rule it or oversee it, therefore there is no religion attached to that deity.


But, if this belief has already spread enough to warrant a name, wouldn't it constitute a religion? (I dozed of during the Sociology of Religion class in which the term "Religion" has been defined. :oops: :oops: ).

How about: an individual who believes in the existence of God? No label, just a description.
Mishuk gotal'u meshuroke, pako kyore.

Image

Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
User avatar
Lieutenant mandalorian2298
 
Posts: 4536
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:57 pm
Location: www.chess.com

Re: A question for people who are into debating religion.

Postby PLAYER57832 on Sun Jul 27, 2008 12:09 pm

brooksieb wrote:What do you call a person who believes in god but has no religion (christianity, islam ect etc).

Unitarians might welcome you into their "fold", if it interests you. "Agnostic" might fit if you question it all. Else, why worry about labels? You are what you are, you believe what you believe. If you have questions... seek answers.

Faith rarely stays the same, even for those who do follow a particular religion or branch.

Haggis_McMutton wrote:Ah, so this is how a new religion is born.

For that answer, look into the Church of Elvis (really exists!).

Or you could try reading L Ron Hubbard : )

mandalorian2298 wrote:
tiberiusaquila wrote:A Deist maintains that a supreme God created the universe but does not rule it or oversee it, therefore there is no religion attached to that deity.


But, if this belief has already spread enough to warrant a name, wouldn't it constitute a religion? (I dozed of during the Sociology of Religion class in which the term "Religion" has been defined. :oops: :oops: ).

How about: an individual who believes in the existence of God? No label, just a description.


"Diesm"/"Diest", etc are labels, unless and until a group forms with similar ideas (no matter how broad).
Corporal PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: A question for people who are into debating religion.

Postby PLAYER57832 on Sun Jul 27, 2008 12:19 pm

Gregrios wrote:
hecter wrote:Gnosticism and agnosticism are two, very different things.


Seriously? I thought they were the same just spelt differently. #-o

What's the difference? :?

Gnosticism is an early sect that was pronounced heretical by the early church. They are a prime reason often cited for cannonizing the Bible as we now know it. The Divinci Code actually borrows a lot of their ideas/beliefs. They were very popular at one time and might have survived (as a religion), except that they also taught celibacy, which somehow, is not terribly condusive to growth.

Agnostic, as was already pointed out, means someone who questions religion, who expresses doubts about whether God exists, etc. - though in some cases, it is used to mean someone who questions a particular faith, (particularly Christianity)
Corporal PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: A question for people who are into debating religion.

Postby MeDeFe on Sun Jul 27, 2008 2:03 pm

PLAYER57832 wrote:"Diesm"/"Diest", etc are labels, unless and until a group forms with similar ideas (no matter how broad).

Deism
Deist
D-e-i, the first three letters of both words are in alphabetical order, do not mix the concept up with diets.

With friendly greetings from the S&GN.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
Major MeDeFe
 
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: A question for people who are into debating religion.

Postby DaGip on Sun Jul 27, 2008 4:09 pm

Haggis_McMutton wrote:
DaGip wrote:
polarbeast23 wrote:
tiberiusaquila wrote:A Deist maintains that a supreme God created the universe but does not rule it or oversee it, therefore there is no religion attached to that deity.

Then this is what I am.


Nah...you ain't a Deist. You are an Iswasatist.

You believe in the great Iswasat, the all powerful Uber Entity of the entire cosmos.

The Iswasat can be broken down into three specific entities (much like the Christian Trinity). The IS, which is your present manifest reality. The WAS, which is your past manifested reality. And, the AT, which is your future manifesting realities. All three of these concepts merge into one eternal quantum now and become the Great Iswasat.

And from the Iswasat sprang a small reflection of itself in the form of a particle consisting of three inherent principles: Vacuum, Impulse, and Parallel Force. Or better known as the Very Important Particle (or VIP for short).

These VIPs emerge faster than our human perspective of light, and therefore, are able to exist in multiple locations all at the same time without even leaving their position (which would be at the point of the Big Bang, which wasn't a BANG but a simple twinkling of energy reflected upon itself--called quantum feedback).

The process of existence occurs within an instant of expansion and contraction of these VIPs. We actually exist BOTH within a huge Black Hole and White Hole at the same time!

The Iswasat reins SUPREME!!!!


Ah, so this is how a new religion is born.

Hmm, you know, if we get in on this early there might be big bucks to be made here.

All, hail the almighty Iswasat (wait, does it like to be praised? )


If it does, then it wouldn't hurt. Maybe just stick in a porno and jerk off. Put your sperm in the microwave, and give it up as an offering. Meanwhile, you need to wear a funny hat...like one of those beer hats with the straw tubes.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class DaGip
 
Posts: 4047
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:48 am
Location: Watertown, South Dakota

Previous

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users