Moderator: Community Team
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
TheProwler wrote:suggs was banned for 6 months. He will survive I think. It is not something the administration of this site should discuss publicly. They have their reasons and I am sure we are not aware of the extent of suggs' malicious actions.
And the Flaming in this thread is uncalled for (DM). Everyone has their opinion and just because it is different than yours, you don't need to start calling him an idiot. It is very childish to get so personally abusive just because someone disagrees with your point of view.
Many people are saying things like "If you keep banning users, it will only hurt the site."
I would like to see the stats on what percentage of players actually visit the Forums.
I suspect that only a very small percentage of players actually come into the Forums. And many that do, will leave when they read some of the nonsense that is here. And they never come back. By banning suggs, more people might visit the Forums and actually stay.
This may be one of the best moves the admin has ever made.
How many players have been chased from the Forums by The Pleasant Chaps? That would also be an interesting statistic. Now, there is one less person here that will be verbally abusive to innocent players who want to join in the discussions.
Only time will tell, but I think the Forums have become a far friendlier place.
I know that I personally feel less intimidated now that suggs is gone. He was alway very negative to anything I said. Ok, I am being facetious now.
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
TheProwler wrote:Are you trying to say that suggs sent you a picture of his wang?
Seriously, that has nothing to do with this.
timmytuttut88 wrote:suggs banned? wtf. as revenge someone put the phone number on 4chan.
Frigidus wrote:timmytuttut88 wrote:suggs banned? wtf. as revenge someone put the phone number on 4chan.
Hm, an interesting idea, but there would be many shouts of "not your personal army".
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Oh for fucks sake, how hard is it to make you see sense here?silvanricky wrote:That's baloney and you know it. The fact that you haven't been banned proves it.
Ahhh yes, the old "I'll try to insult you politely while attempting to label you as the insulting one" ruse... nice, I'm sure nobody will ever see through that one.silvanricky wrote:You're just sounding more like a childish name caller but I'll indulge your temper tantrum for now.
He sure can. Nobody disagrees with you there.silvanricky wrote:Actually it's exactly the issue. It's his website. He can pretty much do what he wants.
Congratulations. It appears that we're getting somewhere.silvanricky wrote:The 6 month ban point is actually a reasonable thing to talk about. The punishment should fit the crime. That's debatable, I agree.
No I wasn't.silvanricky wrote:However, you were saying that he's a poor website manager.
You appear to have mistaken yourself for Lackattack, what with you being the only person to whom I've been disrespectful in this thread.silvanricky wrote:You're being borderline disrespectful to the person who allows you in these forums in the first place.
See above: No childish yelling from me, that whole aspersion is just you lobbing insults of your own around while trying to look like the innocent party. So if you would be so kind, stop this ridiculous blame-casting and name-calling thing, you're really the only party at fault.silvanricky wrote:I know you don't like the spotlight on your childish yelling before but you're the one who did it.
So let me get this straight... posting the publicly available support line number of the software company that manages this website is a challenge to its authority? Right...silvanricky wrote:Assuming that suggs posted lack's phone #, it was a direct challenge to lack's authority and disrespectful for his privacy. He obviously didn't like it.
Shame... some of them are such bores.silvanricky wrote:Freemium members are allowed to post whatever they want.
Oh hurrah! Another ridiculous straw-man argument in which Silvanricky makes up an argument he'd like to rail against.silvanricky wrote:Your $20 entitles you to unlimited games for the year, not an absolute right to be disrespectful towards the administration here.
How about I just participate in a logical movement to attempt to encourage more sensible moderation policies here.silvanricky wrote:Tell you what, why don't you lead a crusade for yourself and others who agree with you to leave.
Oh look, another insult from the man who spent half his post crying about all the insults flying about.silvanricky wrote:You've worked yourself up in a frenzy and it's enjoyable to watch.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
And I hope that they get free brain-upgrades and nightclasses on the art of typing something coherent and useful over there in the USA as part of the "Cut down on imbeciles that spam up threads with bullshit" project.deronimo wrote:I hope they get free sedatives over there in the UK as part of the health care system.
Because if you type the name of the 'software company' that runs CC into Google, then open its website and then dial its contact number... you'll most likely be answered by Lackattack, because he owns and runs both. Apparently 'personal phone number' and 'number of a company owned by that person' are the same thing on the internets these days... who knew?Joodoo wrote:Wait...how did he even find lack's phone number?
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Dancing Mustard wrote:And I hope that they get free brain-upgrades and nightclasses on the art of typing something coherent and useful over there in the USA as part of the "Cut down on imbeciles that spam up threads with bullshit" project.deronimo wrote:I hope they get free sedatives over there in the UK as part of the health care system.
So your comment was constructive and not at all provocative? Well done! Now we only need to find out where that comment went and why there's a provocative one liner that contributes exactly nothing in its place.deronimo wrote:You are acting like a bloody lunatic man. Calm downDancing Mustard wrote:And I hope that they get free brain-upgrades and nightclasses on the art of typing something coherent and useful over there in the USA as part of the "Cut down on imbeciles that spam up threads with bullshit" project.deronimo wrote:I hope they get free sedatives over there in the UK as part of the health care system.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:Frigidus wrote:timmytuttut88 wrote:suggs banned? wtf. as revenge someone put the phone number on 4chan.
Hm, an interesting idea, but there would be many shouts of "not your personal army".
Maybe a new thread with only the number and city under "random" would be enough?
Juan_Bottom wrote:So what do we do now?
Do we write a letter or something? This place is starting to get on my nerves.
Frigidus wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:So what do we do now?
Do we write a letter or something? This place is starting to get on my nerves.
We do nothing. There was a shit storm when Norse was banned. Hell, I think DM is one ban away from a perma ban, and it's only a matter of time. In general a good forum is one without a high level of secret policemanship, and this forum is above and beyond in that category. I like the people here, and that's why I don't leave. Once they ban a few more people I'm out. I suppose it won't matter much, as they'll always have more posters to fill the void, but all the things that are worthy of a ban here are things that make forums enjoyable.
Ditocoaf wrote:RIP Suggs
FREE SUGGS
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Dancing Mustard wrote:I still want to see Suggs walk free.
Remember kids: Suggs was an inside job!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users