More "proof" that the scoring system is rigged (Split)

by **KLOBBER** on Sat Aug 02, 2008 8:55 am

Thank you for pointing out this unfair discrepancy.

How about bonus points for members who play the greatest percentage of unique members per game completed, and point penalties for those who play the least percentage of unique players per game completed? No more abuse of the system by the "old boy" crew.

This would certainly even out this obvious discrepancy in the scores and ranks.

by **Dancing Mustard** on Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:03 am

What about a point penalties for people who only play against deadbeat n00bs and who ignore-list everybody who beats them? I think that'd be a great idea, don't you Klobber?

That ought to put an end to "Retards who can't play this game to save their life that spend their time scamming new players, and stroking their dicks while mouthing off in the forums about how awesome they think they are".

I'm not thinking of anybody specific when I say that of course. But it's just the kind of bullshit that CC ought to be dealing with, because it's flagrant scoring system abuse.

by **KLOBBER** on Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:12 am

Dancing Mustard, I would like to point out that your unkind and untrue statements have hurt my feelings deeply: I am gently weeping, and also trembling, as I type this.

Please try to stop being such a mean and dishonest person, and I hope you have a wonderful day.

by **e_i_pi** on Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:14 am

I like the way he refers to his proof as "proof"

by **jpliberty** on Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 am

KLOBBER wrote:Dancing Mustard, I would like to point out that your unkind and untrue statements have hurt my feelings deeply: I am gently weeping, and trembling, as I type this.

Please try to stop being such a mean person, and I hope you have a wonderful day.

I was raised to be anti-social. For me, there is no other reality...Combat is my nature, conquest my game and domination my goal.

by **oVo** on Sat Aug 02, 2008 11:50 am

That's totally hilarious that klobber identified with Dancing Mustard's post, but for anyone to think of him as retarded is surely speculation, conjecture and hearsay. Regardless of how much data he continues to provide.

by **KLOBBER** on Sat Aug 02, 2008 12:11 pm

oVo wrote:That's totally hilarious that klobber identified with Dancing Mustard's post, but for anyone to think of him as retarded is surely speculation, conjecture and hearsay. Regardless of how much data he continues to provide.

How do you mean?

by **The Fuzzy Pengui** on Sat Aug 02, 2008 12:47 pm

Here ya go guys, since this didn't really have anything to do with the original topic feel free to discuss it here.

If you feel the need to turn this into a flame battle, please direct yourselves to flame wars

by **comic boy** on Sat Aug 02, 2008 1:21 pm

KLOBBER wrote:Thank you for pointing out this unfair discrepancy.

How about bonus points for members who play the greatest percentage of unique members per game completed, and point penalties for those who play the least percentage of unique players per game completed? No more abuse of the system by the "old boy" crew.

This would certainly even out this obvious discrepancy in the scores and ranks.

Excellent idea though of course there would, im sure you agree, need to be a qualifying period before noobs became ' unique members, 50 games would be about right to prevent abuse.