http://www.lochaberhighlandestates.com/index.php/language/us?gclid=COrksJnboJUCFQp2gwodAw34jQ
$59.99
Is that how cheap nobility comes today? I would've guessed at least $100.
Moderator: Community Team







Hologram wrote:I saw this and I just had to laugh:
http://www.lochaberhighlandestates.com/index.php/language/us?gclid=COrksJnboJUCFQp2gwodAw34jQ
$59.99
Is that how cheap nobility comes today? I would've guessed at least $100.
![]()
![]()







puns are not funny....why am I laughing?Hologram wrote:Just goes to show you that anyone will try anything to make a buck.







bedub1 wrote:puns are not funny....why am I laughing?Hologram wrote:Just goes to show you that anyone will try anything to make a buck.
Also, any American can have a title, it's just that the US government can't issue titles of nobility. So, for instance, you could be the Duke of York and live in Connecticut, but there's no such thing as, say, the Baron of Los Angeles. That would just be stupid. And against the law.muy_thaiguy wrote:Hologram wrote:I saw this and I just had to laugh:
http://www.lochaberhighlandestates.com/index.php/language/us?gclid=COrksJnboJUCFQp2gwodAw34jQ
$59.99
Is that how cheap nobility comes today? I would've guessed at least $100.
![]()
![]()
I thought that if you are a US citizen, you could not legally have any titles like that.
And why is white-tailed deer in an ad for Scotland?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.










MeDeFe wrote:So you pay 59.99$ for the title "Land Owner", great!
Our Founding Fathers wrote:No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.










MeDeFe wrote:"Land of the free", eh? You're not even allowed to be a Lord if you want to.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong

































gimil wrote:MeDeFe wrote:"Land of the free", eh? You're not even allowed to be a Lord if you want to.
You can be a lord if you want to, it will just cost you...
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
















Users browsing this forum: No registered users