you guys

by **BigBallinStalin** on Fri May 18, 2012 8:09 am

Now it's time to ban night strike and PS, if we wish to be consistent in enforcement.

Furthermore, any topics which incite angst among a few cc members is a ban-able offense unless a comprehensive bibliography of at least 3 books and 5 academic articles is provided at the end of the post.

by **thegreekdog** on Fri May 18, 2012 8:11 am

BigBallinStalin wrote:Now it's time to ban night strike and PS, if we wish to be consistent in enforcement.

Furthermore, any topics which incite angst among a few cc members is a ban-able offense unless a comprehensive bibliography of at least 3 books and 5 academic articles is provided at the end of the post.

I think he was talking about the American war in Iraq, not disciplinary action on CC. Perhaps nietzsche can clarify.

by **jonesthecurl** on Fri May 18, 2012 8:18 am

I think he may have been referencing the way that Saddam baited Bush by not attacking the Twin Towers and not having any WMD's.

by **BigBallinStalin** on Fri May 18, 2012 8:42 am

thegreekdog wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Now it's time to ban night strike and PS, if we wish to be consistent in enforcement.

Furthermore, any topics which incite angst among a few cc members is a ban-able offense unless a comprehensive bibliography of at least 3 books and 5 academic articles is provided at the end of the post.

I think he was talking about the American war in Iraq, not disciplinary action on CC. Perhaps nietzsche can clarify.

Perhaps this is true, but tell me, Dr. Dog, what you make of the following sequence of events:

1) After an altercation with pimpdave at McGill, the Voluntary Dictatorship Tribunal in a fit of rage and paranoia unleashed the Ban Hammer.

2) An odd exchange of PMs between nietz and PD soon followed, order was restored in McGill, along with many fits of giggling among the McGill denizens.

3) Although the above is only briefly referenced in the open fora, Nietzsche makes a bold move by starting a thread that demands justice at the price of PD's blood.

4) Much CC drama ensues, and between the foray of troll-shots, fired by all sides, the pimpdave succumbs to his inner rage. His trolling and baiting become more obvious than the rest.

5) pimpdave becomes guested.

6) Nietzsche launches a victory thread,

And here we are, my good dog-man. The answer is obvious, but I wonder: is Nietzsche intentionally foreshadowing?

That particular picture reeks of more to come.

by **thegreekdog** on Fri May 18, 2012 8:48 am

Hmm... that's interesting and something I did not think of.

I guess the usual moderator speak applies here: "We're going to leave this thread open and we'll monitor it."

by **nietzsche** on Fri May 18, 2012 3:50 pm

First of all, for that you need proof BBS.

Second, I just saw the pic I posted for the second time, I didn't notice the coffins when I posted it so it's of bad taste and I'm changing it.

I wish not to talk about pd anymore, so I'm going to resume my thoughts about it here, trying not to flame, troll or bait.

1. I am not against pd's ideology, in fact I think we share some points. I am against his way of expressing it.
2. What I've seen is that those who support pd are mainly against tea party/ republicans / church / religion and fail to comment about what I've been protesting again, his acidic remarks.
3. I asked for justice to be done against pd's long ago, and I did it because I truly believe he was baiting and plotting against some users. He was making OT less enjoyable.
4. He behaves more like a normal person in mcgill where he isn't baiting anyone, so you guys won't miss him much, you will enjoy him much.
5. pd did clearly cross the line way too many times, and his last thread was clear baiting against NS, and somehow Symmetry got lost in the phrasing between NS and pd and actually verbally "attacked" NS even though NS wasn't saying anything bad: just to prove that pd has a way with words.

And finally, I know you like to win arguments BBS, so you'll probably come after all I just typed with very good points, rational and all. I'm not gonna fall for it, your English is better than mine and I stand to lose. You have proven that you are more rational than me.

by **saxitoxin** on Fri May 18, 2012 4:01 pm

nietzsche wrote:I'm not gonna fall for it, your English is better than mine and I stand to lose.

All further debate in this thread must be conducted in Swedish so everyone has an equal chance.

Gillpig will moderate.

by **Phatscotty** on Fri May 18, 2012 4:03 pm

I didn't get banned. Just a warning

Beiber's campaign against Phatsco continues

by **Symmetry** on Fri May 18, 2012 4:10 pm

nietzsche wrote:First of all, for that you need proof BBS.

Second, I just saw the pic I posted for the second time, I didn't notice the coffins when I posted it so it's of bad taste and I'm changing it.

I wish not to talk about pd anymore, so I'm going to resume my thoughts about it here, trying not to flame, troll or bait.

1. I am not against pd's ideology, in fact I think we share some points. I am against his way of expressing it.
2. What I've seen is that those who support pd are mainly against tea party/ republicans / church / religion and fail to comment about what I've been protesting again, his acidic remarks.
3. I asked for justice to be done against pd's long ago, and I did it because I truly believe he was baiting and plotting against some users. He was making OT less enjoyable.
4. He behaves more like a normal person in mcgill where he isn't baiting anyone, so you guys won't miss him much, you will enjoy him much.
5. pd did clearly cross the line way too many times, and his last thread was clear baiting against NS, and somehow Symmetry got lost in the phrasing between NS and pd and actually verbally "attacked" NS even though NS wasn't saying anything bad: just to prove that pd has a way with words.

And finally, I know you like to win arguments BBS, so you'll probably come after all I just typed with very good points, rational and all. I'm not gonna fall for it, your English is better than mine and I stand to lose. You have proven that you are more rational than me.

For what it's worth, Nietszche is correct. I got confused and messed up. Anybody blaming Nietszche for something I did wrong needs to be pointed in my direction. Personally, NS and PD should probably get a room. or use PM, as both revel in the public spats and will never care about who else gets drawn in.