Moderator: Community Team






































natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"








There would be two simultaneous but different results, since Schrödinger's Cat both does and does not exist at the same time.x-raider wrote:The thought occurred to me: What would happen if Pavlov's Dogs met Schrödinger's Cat.
I didn't want to google it so I could discuss it instead.
What do you think?
On the technical side of things: Pavlov's Dogs would be long dead now and Schrödinger's Cat never actually existed ( 'twas but a thought experiment).








































Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.






john9blue wrote:they could team up with algernon, stephen hawking's turtles, and those monkeys writing shakespeare to form some kind of fucked-up experimental-animal-superhero-squad
daddy1gringo wrote:There would be two simultaneous but different results, since Schrödinger's Cat both does and does not exist at the same time.
Army of GOD wrote:clearly the dog will think cause a ruckus, knock the poison over and kill the cat, regardless if the poison was knocked over by chance.
GreecePwns wrote:What if...what if...what if...the Tesseract and the Allspark...were the same thing.
Whoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooa dude. Youjustblewmyminnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnd!
BigBallinStalin wrote:but like... wouldn't the radiation turn the dog into a super tiger which would... uhh.. destroy the cat and eat the cheese in the box?




































Baron Von PWN wrote:couldn't that just as easily be shrondingers politician? I mean you could probably make a similar criticism of Obama.



Symmetry wrote:Baron Von PWN wrote:couldn't that just as easily be shrondingers politician? I mean you could probably make a similar criticism of Obama.
You could, of course, but when you opened the box would the criticism be accurate?









Baron Von PWN wrote:couldn't that just as easily be shrondingers politician? I mean you could probably make a similar criticism of Obama.






















Symmetry wrote:
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"








john9blue wrote:Symmetry wrote:
this idea was stolen from an NYT article. plagiarism!!!
in all seriousness though, the article is very funny, here's a link: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/01/opini ... omney.html




















Users browsing this forum: No registered users