Moderator: Community Team




























jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
























Aradhus wrote:I think you guys are onto something here. Lets write an angry letter to somebody to complain about it. We'll fill the letter with cursewords. It'll be epic.













saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.






























Nola_Lifer wrote:Why do you think South Park is so funny. The bleeped out words make it aw*some
















nietzsche wrote:ManB you never did the picture























PLAYER57832 wrote:Its sort of manners.
If you were not allowed to use any variation of the word, first it would cut out a fair number of utterly unrelated words. Second, it would just move people to find some other buttons to push. This is a "polite compromise". Folks can pretend the word is unknown if they wish and others can feel that they are sort of pushing things by using them.Nola_Lifer wrote:Why do you think South Park is so funny. The bleeped out words make it aw*some
Yeah, I keep thinking of that Saturday NIght LIve skit.. "you % # ^% B*tch". ( I think it was supposed to be a political debate??)
It was incredibly funny precisely because we all knew that deep down, behind all the "polite words" that was pretty much what folks were thinking. In a few years, it won't be funny, because, well.. those things will just be said outright.
But will we really have gained anything? If anything, the power of those words will just be diminished. Our language will be shortened, not enriched.
There is something much more entertaining about hearing invectives like "you son of a mongoose and a chimpanzee wearing a frilly apron" or whatever (OK, not fantastic at coming up with the stuff.. but you get the point_). "F*ck you" is just BORING













































Symmetry wrote:Meh, swearing as a habit is a sign of stupidity. Swearing should be used emphasise a point, either through strong emotional attachment to the point, or through creative humour.
People who just swear a lot are lazy.


















Woodruff wrote:Symmetry wrote:Meh, swearing as a habit is a sign of stupidity. Swearing should be used emphasise a point, either through strong emotional attachment to the point, or through creative humour.
People who just swear a lot are lazy.
This is something I try to get through to a few of my students who have developed this habit. They claim that they do it because it makes an impact, but they don't seem to understand that when they do it all the time, there is no impact being made by it.



Symmetry wrote:Woodruff wrote:Symmetry wrote:Meh, swearing as a habit is a sign of stupidity. Swearing should be used emphasise a point, either through strong emotional attachment to the point, or through creative humour.
People who just swear a lot are lazy.
This is something I try to get through to a few of my students who have developed this habit. They claim that they do it because it makes an impact, but they don't seem to understand that when they do it all the time, there is no impact being made by it.
Try giving them an essay where you replace periods with exclamation points as punctuation! If they don't think it looks stupid, there's little hope for them! It's worked for me in the past! At least as a good visual! But, then again!!!










Users browsing this forum: No registered users