Conquer Club

You don't need a top in the Big Apple

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

You don't need a top in the Big Apple

Postby tzor on Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:51 pm

Sometimes, the strangest things are found in the conservative forums. I found this in the general section of Sean Hannity's forums.

The following video (completely G rated) talks about this young woman and her crusade to show to the peple of New York City that technically, under the law in the city, it is not illegal for women to go topless.

http://www.hlntv.com/video/2012/08/16/t ... e-standard


(Yea, but you still can't buy a big gulp.)
Last edited by tzor on Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: You don't need a top in the Big Apple

Postby tkr4lf on Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:52 pm

That link doesn't go to anything. It says they can't find that page.
User avatar
Major tkr4lf
 
Posts: 1976
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 11:35 am
Location: St. Louis

Re: You don't need a top in the Big Apple

Postby / on Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:07 pm

http://www.hlntv.com/video/2012/08/16/t ... e-standard

Honestly, I find it a bit gross for either gender to be out in public topless...
Sergeant 1st Class /
 
Posts: 484
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 2:41 am

Re: You don't need a top in the Big Apple

Postby jimboston on Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:19 pm

/ wrote:http://www.hlntv.com/video/2012/08/16/topless-woman-talks-societys-double-standard

Honestly, I find it a bit gross for either gender to be out in public topless...


Not if they look like her!
(Yeah, I know she's not a "10" but she appears to be in pretty decent shape.)

The point being... I don't think we're gonna get a bunch of 40-50 yo women with "saggies" going out and being activists like this.

On a serious note...
1) If men can go topless, women should be able to as well.
2) Yeah, in many public places it might be "gross" or "inappropriate"... but I can think of times when it would be fine or more comfortable; the beach, the pool, hot days doing yard work, at the park laying out and relaxing for a bit, on a jog (possibly.. for men or small breasted women).
User avatar
Private 1st Class jimboston
 
Posts: 5379
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:45 pm
Location: Boston (Area), Massachusetts; U.S.A.

Re: You don't need a top in the Big Apple

Postby Army of GOD on Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:30 pm

It's not even close to a double standard. Women's boobs are, similar to el vagina or the brown eye, an object of sexual attraction. Men's tits aren't.

I could care less if they go topless, I just hate how some women act like they're second-rate citizens.
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7191
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: You don't need a top in the Big Apple

Postby jimboston on Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:33 pm

Army of GOD wrote:It's not even close to a double standard. Women's boobs are, similar to el vagina or the brown eye, an object of sexual attraction. Men's tits aren't.

I could care less if they go topless, I just hate how some women act like they're second-rate citizens.


A naked male top is an object of sexual attraction to...
1) Women
2) Gay Men

It is a double standard.
User avatar
Private 1st Class jimboston
 
Posts: 5379
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:45 pm
Location: Boston (Area), Massachusetts; U.S.A.

Re: You don't need a top in the Big Apple

Postby Army of GOD on Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:38 pm

jimboston wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:It's not even close to a double standard. Women's boobs are, similar to el vagina or the brown eye, an object of sexual attraction. Men's tits aren't.

I could care less if they go topless, I just hate how some women act like they're second-rate citizens.


A naked male top is an object of sexual attraction to...
1) Women
2) Gay Men

It is a double standard.


Not really.

I mean, I guess, but to some guys women's feet are an object of sexual attraction but that's just trivializing the phrase.

A guy's chest has very little to do with sexual reproduction while a women's chest does (you know, breastfeeding and shit).

By that logic, we should all be able to wear assless chaps in public, right?

If so, I fucking am buying like, 20 pairs. Maybe saxi will let me borrow his.
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7191
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: You don't need a top in the Big Apple

Postby tzor on Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:44 pm

tkr4lf wrote:That link doesn't go to anything. It says they can't find that page.


Sorry, fixed that link.
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: You don't need a top in the Big Apple

Postby jimboston on Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:48 pm

Army of GOD wrote:
jimboston wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:It's not even close to a double standard. Women's boobs are, similar to el vagina or the brown eye, an object of sexual attraction. Men's tits aren't.

I could care less if they go topless, I just hate how some women act like they're second-rate citizens.


A naked male top is an object of sexual attraction to...
1) Women
2) Gay Men

It is a double standard.


Not really.

I mean, I guess, but to some guys women's feet are an object of sexual attraction but that's just trivializing the phrase.

A guy's chest has very little to do with sexual reproduction while a women's chest does (you know, breastfeeding and shit).

By that logic, we should all be able to wear assless chaps in public, right?

If so, I fucking am buying like, 20 pairs. Maybe saxi will let me borrow his.


You do that AOG.

The bottom line is that IF WE WANT TO CLAIM WE ARE A COUNTRY OF EQUAL RIGHTS FOR THE SEXES, then we must have laws that don't discriminate based on an individual's sex.

If it's gonna be about what turns people on or off subjectively... or maybe grosses people out.

Then fat men should also be required by law to wear shirts at all times.
User avatar
Private 1st Class jimboston
 
Posts: 5379
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:45 pm
Location: Boston (Area), Massachusetts; U.S.A.

Re: You don't need a top in the Big Apple

Postby aad0906 on Tue Aug 28, 2012 10:35 pm

I work in NYC and yesterday morning around 8am she sat in my local train and she got of at Union Square station. I couldn't believe my eyes and she just calmly walked up the stairs like it was perfectly normal. Fisrt I thought she ws nuts but later that day I found out it was about some gender equality thing.
User avatar
Major aad0906
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 8:15 pm
Location: New Jersey, USA

Re: You don't need a top in the Big Apple

Postby Army of GOD on Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:11 pm

did you jack it?
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7191
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: You don't need a top in the Big Apple

Postby natty dread on Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:59 pm

AoG why do you have to be such a sexist? Do you hate boobs or something?
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class natty dread
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked


Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users