notyou2 wrote:HapSmo19 wrote:chang50 wrote:Seems like semantics to me,absolutely successful prediction is surely impossible.Are you claiming everyone can forecast with more or less equal accuracy?
No, I'm claiming that "There is a fifty percent chance of a magnitude 5.5 at location x sometime in the next ten years" is completely fucking useless information.
Useless to man as that is a substantial amount of time in a mans life, but to the earth, it is incredibly accurate that you can say there will be an earthquake here within 10 years to something that is over 4 billion years old.
Because the range of 4 billion years is useful to humans living today and planning for tomorrow.
amirite amirite amirite?

I don't know much about how forecasting (which is predicting) earthquakes, but [insert opinion here]. It seems that there are some variables which are important yet cannot be made tractable, so the scientist who attempts to forecast the location and exact date of an earthquake should not be expected to accurately predict earthquakes. I assume that the best they can do is record instances of earthquakes at various magnitudes and epicenters, and then make a not-so-useful ballpark figure for the next earthquake.
---But that's using past data to make future projections, which--as far as I know--are very unreliable for earthquakes.
All they can say is that Zone A is 'active,' in that there's been a volcanic eruption or Serious earthquake in Zone A within the past 50 (or 100?) years.
Therefore, this wringing out the scientists and throwing them in prison is a farce. It's just another political parade where scapegoats are stomped on for the voters' delight.