Conquer Club

MORE IRS ACTIVITY

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

MORE IRS ACTIVITY

Postby Nobunaga on Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:07 am

So let's see.... They target conservative groups, yet coach others for political benefit?

http://dailycaller.com/2013/09/13/eric- ... -activity/

Anybody want to step up to defend the agency here on this one?
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Nobunaga
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 10:09 am
Location: West of Osaka

Re: MORE IRS ACTIVITY

Postby Symmetry on Sat Sep 14, 2013 11:16 am

Sure, isn't part of the IRS's job to inform people about what's legal and what's illegal in terms of tax law? I know that the article is specifically worried about "black" churches getting this information, though I personally see no reason why the article should be concerned about them complying with the law.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: MORE IRS ACTIVITY

Postby Nobunaga on Sun Sep 15, 2013 8:33 pm

The IRS is giving specific instructions to churches, based on the race of congregations, on how to be politically active while maintaining tax-exempt status.

This is being compared to the IRS' treatment of conservative groups, targeting those seeking tax-exempt status.

Why was not such instruction given by the IRS to these conservative groups? And another thing, the IRS is a government-affiliated organization. Does anybody else here see a problem with church & state issues?

Sym, I know you're going to be intentionally obtuse on this one, and that's cool. But I know you see the point.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Nobunaga
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 10:09 am
Location: West of Osaka

Re: MORE IRS ACTIVITY

Postby Symmetry on Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:04 pm

Nobunaga wrote:The IRS is giving specific instructions to churches, based on the race of congregations, on how to be politically active while maintaining tax-exempt status.

This is being compared to the IRS' treatment of conservative groups, targeting those seeking tax-exempt status.

Why was not such instruction given by the IRS to these conservative groups? And another thing, the IRS is a government-affiliated organization. Does anybody else here see a problem with church & state issues?

Sym, I know you're going to be intentionally obtuse on this one, and that's cool. But I know you see the point.


Sadly I don't see the point. I realise that you're on some level disturbed by the idea that "black" churches comply with the law, and receive advice from the IRS in how to do so, as per the IRS's job. I'm just unsure where the problem is in them doing this.

Do you feel that they were wrong to help groups follow the law?
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am


Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ConfederateSS