Jamie Foxx Now Paralyzed, Blind

[saxitoxin]

Horrific health details have been revealed regarding Jamie Foxx’s mysterious medical state.

The Django Unchained star is said to be "partially paralyzed and blind," in addition to a series of other complications after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, Hollywood journalist A.J. Benza claimed after speaking to a source close to Foxx.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medica ... fa8a&ei=12

A new study - released this month in the journal Nature - reported a high chance of long-term vision loss among those who received the experimental and largely ineffective mRNA COVID-19 vaccine that was briefly popular in 2021-2022: viewtopic.php?f=8&t=239532

[bigtoughralf]

My semen volume once declined significantly following a round of antibiotics for chlamydia, but recovered again within a few weeks. Hopefully Jamie will recover from his drug-induced ailments with similar speed.

[saxitoxin]

define "significantly"

[mookiemcgee]

Are we sure he isn't filming Ray 2?

[bigtoughralf]

define "significantly"

Down to like 20% of the normal tsunami.

[saxitoxin]

define "significantly"

Down to like 20% of the normal tsunami.

ready to be cuckolded by DDS

[DirtyDishSoap]

define "significantly"

Down to like 20% of the normal tsunami.

ready to be cuckolded by DDS

Shutup and give me your lunch money, pleb.

[GaryDenton]

Wanted to see what idiotic misinformation is being pushed now by people who get their news from propaganda sites and serial liars.
The CDC states that COVID-19 vaccines are safe, effective, and reduce your risk of severe illness. Hundreds of millions of people have received a COVID-19 vaccine, and serious adverse reactions are uncommon. You should always consult a reputable physician before making any decisions about your health.

[GaryDenton]

It’s not whether you fall down: it’s whether you get back up and wipe the floor with Republicans on the budget.
- Dark Brandon.

[saxitoxin]

The CDC states

The guy who picks the head of the CDC:

effective

Meanwhile, science states it's not effective (here's three of 19 different studies less than six months old I can cite):

March 2023: New Bivalent Vax Between 0% to 29% Effective (preprint study by Cleveland Clinic researchers)

A preprint study by Cleveland Clinic researchers finds the emergency-authorized bivalent vax is 29% effective against the BA.4/5 variant, 20% effective against the BQ variant, and 0% effective against the XB variant. (To receive initial approval in non-emergency conditions, vaccines must demonstrate 50%+ efficacy.)



Among 51017 working-aged Cleveland Clinic employees, the bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% effective in preventing infection while the BA.4/5 lineages were dominant, and 20% effective while the BQ lineages were. Effectiveness was not demonstrated when the XBB lineages were dominant.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101 ... 625v5.full



-----
May 2023: mRNA Vaccines Useless After a Couple Months (Journal of the American Medical Association)

A new study by Italian researchers, published in JAMA, shows that - unless you're willing to get boostered every couple of months (and accept the compounding risks of myocarditis that increase with each new shot) - there's basically no point in getting vaccinated.



This systematic review and meta-analysis of secondary data from 40 studies found that the estimated vaccine effectiveness against both laboratory-confirmed Omicron infection and symptomatic disease was lower than 20% at 6 months from the administration of the primary vaccination cycle and less than 30% at 9 months from the administration of a booster dose.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamane ... le/2804451



-------------------------

May 2023: mRNA Vaccines No Better than Placebo (Cell)

A new study by researchers at the Danish Institute of Advanced Science published in the Q1 journal Cell finds there was no statistically significant difference in COVID-19 survival rates between people who received an mRNA vaccine and those who did not. It did find a small, but still statistically significant, difference in survival rates for viral vector vaccines such as AstraZeneca and J&J.



The differences in the effects of adenovirus-vector and mRNA vaccines on overall mortality, if true, would have a major impact on global health. If validated in additional studies, the protective non-specific effects of adenovirus-based vaccines on non-COVID-19 mortality, in addition to their effectiveness against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, may represent an important advantage in vulnerable populations in which cardiovascular mortality is high.

https://www.cell.com/iscience/fulltext/S2589-0042(23)00810-6