- by 'richer', I mean (a) in terms of wealth, (b) utility, or (c) whatever you think.
Moderator: Community Team
BigBallinStalin wrote:by 'richer', I mean (a) in terms of wealth, (b) utility, or (c) whatever you think.
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Give them jobs and education.
thegreekdog wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Give them jobs and education.
"Give them" you say?
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
mrswdk wrote:By reducing regulations and expanding the roles of free markets in all parts of the impoverished people's lives.
Matthew Parris wrote:Those who want Africa to walk tall amid 21st-century global competition must not kid themselves that providing the material means or even the knowhow that accompanies what we call development will make the change. A whole belief system must first be supplanted.
And I'm afraid it has to be supplanted by another. Removing Christian evangelism from the African equation may leave the continent at the mercy of a malign fusion of Nike, the witch doctor, the mobile phone and the machete.
According to the World Bank, corruption in the form of bribery and theft by government officials, the main target of the UN Convention, costs developing countries between $20bn and $40bn each year. That's a lot of money. But it's an extremely small proportion - only about 3 percent - of the total illicit flows that leak out of public coffers. On the other hand, multinational companies steal more than $900bn from developing countries each year through tax evasion and other illicit practices.
notyou2 wrote:Eat the poor.
Problem solved.
DoomYoshi wrote:notyou2 wrote:Eat the poor.
Problem solved.
Good answer, Mr. Swift.
Metsfanmax wrote:Ending corruption might help.
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinio ... 80135.htmlAccording to the World Bank, corruption in the form of bribery and theft by government officials, the main target of the UN Convention, costs developing countries between $20bn and $40bn each year. That's a lot of money. But it's an extremely small proportion - only about 3 percent - of the total illicit flows that leak out of public coffers. On the other hand, multinational companies steal more than $900bn from developing countries each year through tax evasion and other illicit practices.
Army of GOD wrote:inb4 give them money/tax the rich/more government vs. make them earn the money/lower taxes/less government
If it was that easy, there wouldn't be any poor people now would there?
Lootifer wrote:Provide two simple things:
- Provide for them the opportunity, free of significant barriers, to become "not poor" or, ideally, "rich". This includes removing the protectionism so common with the modern "rich"
- Ensure that all children, regardless of the poor decision making capacity of their parents, can eat well, maintain good health and experience equivilent levels of education to children who have good decision making parents
I would also suggest trying to establish a culture where we don't subsidise intelligence and ambition (or greed if you will) so heavily, but that's in the too hard basket for now (and not something that can be centrally planned nor will it come from the free market in its current form).
BigBallinStalin wrote:Lootifer wrote:Provide two simple things:
- Provide for them the opportunity, free of significant barriers, to become "not poor" or, ideally, "rich". This includes removing the protectionism so common with the modern "rich"
- Ensure that all children, regardless of the poor decision making capacity of their parents, can eat well, maintain good health and experience equivilent levels of education to children who have good decision making parents
I would also suggest trying to establish a culture where we don't subsidise intelligence and ambition (or greed if you will) so heavily, but that's in the too hard basket for now (and not something that can be centrally planned nor will it come from the free market in its current form).
-reduce barriers to trade? How? - Remove the fences around the garbage dumps
- how? Dump more food on them? - Transfer them all close to the garbage dumps
What'chya mean with the underlined? "Subsidize greed"? - We stop letting "the man" control the garbage dumps
notyou2 wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Lootifer wrote:Provide two simple things:
- Provide for them the opportunity, free of significant barriers, to become "not poor" or, ideally, "rich". This includes removing the protectionism so common with the modern "rich"
- Ensure that all children, regardless of the poor decision making capacity of their parents, can eat well, maintain good health and experience equivilent levels of education to children who have good decision making parents
I would also suggest trying to establish a culture where we don't subsidise intelligence and ambition (or greed if you will) so heavily, but that's in the too hard basket for now (and not something that can be centrally planned nor will it come from the free market in its current form).
-reduce barriers to trade? How? - Remove the fences around the garbage dumps
- how? Dump more food on them? - Transfer them all close to the garbage dumps
What'chya mean with the underlined? "Subsidize greed"? - We stop letting "the man" control the garbage dumps
My answers are after your 3 questions.
BigBallinStalin wrote:notyou2 wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Lootifer wrote:Provide two simple things:
- Provide for them the opportunity, free of significant barriers, to become "not poor" or, ideally, "rich". This includes removing the protectionism so common with the modern "rich"
- Ensure that all children, regardless of the poor decision making capacity of their parents, can eat well, maintain good health and experience equivilent levels of education to children who have good decision making parents
I would also suggest trying to establish a culture where we don't subsidise intelligence and ambition (or greed if you will) so heavily, but that's in the too hard basket for now (and not something that can be centrally planned nor will it come from the free market in its current form).
-reduce barriers to trade? How? - Remove the fences around the garbage dumps
- how? Dump more food on them? - Transfer them all close to the garbage dumps
What'chya mean with the underlined? "Subsidize greed"? - We stop letting "the man" control the garbage dumps
My answers are after your 3 questions.
Haha, "let them eat garbage." Well done, notyou2. Your presidential position of the World Bank awaits you.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users