Moderator: Community Team
luns101 wrote:I heard that Richardson & Kucinich got upset because they're not being taken seriously. I'll wait to see if someone posts it on youtube. It does seem kind of pathetic that they even have these debates when everyone knows Clinton will be the eventual nominee.
Of course now that I've said that she'll go down in flames just like Howard Dean did to Kerry in 2004.
reverend_kyle wrote:Did anyone see this? It looked like a roast of Hillary Clinton. Every candidate was taking turns making fun of her. She did a good job of making herself look dumb too.
Then there was Joe Biden who missed the memo that they were roasting Clinton and started making fun of Guiliani out of nowhere. It was quite bizarre.
All in all Kucinich won the debate and made the most good points.
I'd like to see Kucinich v. Paul debate. The two backrunners duking it out.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
luns101 wrote:I heard that Richardson & Kucinich got upset because they're not being taken seriously. I'll wait to see if someone posts it on youtube. It does seem kind of pathetic that they even have these debates when everyone knows Clinton will be the eventual nominee.
Of course now that I've said that she'll go down in flames just like Howard Dean did to Kerry in 2004.
muy_thaiguy wrote:luns101 wrote:I heard that Richardson & Kucinich got upset because they're not being taken seriously. I'll wait to see if someone posts it on youtube. It does seem kind of pathetic that they even have these debates when everyone knows Clinton will be the eventual nominee.
Of course now that I've said that she'll go down in flames just like Howard Dean did to Kerry in 2004.One can only hope luns.
True, but it also means she has a VERY slim chance of being Mr. President and Billy boy the 1st Lady.luns101 wrote:muy_thaiguy wrote:luns101 wrote:I heard that Richardson & Kucinich got upset because they're not being taken seriously. I'll wait to see if someone posts it on youtube. It does seem kind of pathetic that they even have these debates when everyone knows Clinton will be the eventual nominee.
Of course now that I've said that she'll go down in flames just like Howard Dean did to Kerry in 2004.One can only hope luns.
Are you kidding me? Hillary is the only chance that the Republicans have of winning in 2008.
OnlyAmbrose wrote:Kucinich is the only Democrat I hold any semblance of respect for in this election.
spurgistan wrote:Wait, Kucinich is the Democratic's resident crazy person? What happened to Gravel? Did he get disappeared by the military-industrial complex?
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
luns101 wrote:muy_thaiguy wrote:luns101 wrote:I heard that Richardson & Kucinich got upset because they're not being taken seriously. I'll wait to see if someone posts it on youtube. It does seem kind of pathetic that they even have these debates when everyone knows Clinton will be the eventual nominee.
Of course now that I've said that she'll go down in flames just like Howard Dean did to Kerry in 2004.One can only hope luns.
Are you kidding me? Hillary is the only chance that the Republicans have of winning in 2008.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
riggable wrote:I like Gravel and Kucinich equally, the one thing I can say for Kucinich is he is being taken more seriously than Gravel. Gravel says what he thinks though, as opposed to P.R. approved responses(aka cunton)
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
MeDeFe wrote:What happens if you hand in an empty voting card? Is it discarded or does it get counted but it doesn't count for anyone?
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
jay_a2j wrote:I take it you haven't gone to Ron Paul's website. Paul could beat any of the dems.Did I mention Ron Paul '08!!!!!!?
luns101 wrote:jay_a2j wrote:I take it you haven't gone to Ron Paul's website. Paul could beat any of the dems.Did I mention Ron Paul '08!!!!!!?
Jay, I'm afraid you've gotten caught up in the Ron Paul hysteria. I'm assuming you're a conservative. I could show you the differences if you're willing to engage in a discussion on this man. I know you are a well-meaning individual and very passionate with your beliefs.
jay_a2j wrote:luns101 wrote:muy_thaiguy wrote:luns101 wrote:I heard that Richardson & Kucinich got upset because they're not being taken seriously. I'll wait to see if someone posts it on youtube. It does seem kind of pathetic that they even have these debates when everyone knows Clinton will be the eventual nominee.
Of course now that I've said that she'll go down in flames just like Howard Dean did to Kerry in 2004.One can only hope luns.
Are you kidding me? Hillary is the only chance that the Republicans have of winning in 2008.
I take it you haven't gone to Ron Paul's website. Paul could beat any of the dems.![]()
Did I mention Ron Paul '08!!!!!!?
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
spurgistan wrote:One thing - is there a reason why Paul people feel the need to put big spaces in the middle of their posts? Is there some sort of memo?
Oh, and Jay: no way in hell Paul gets any appreciable number of votes from the Democratic voters in the general election. If you think he's the best Repub candidate, then vote for him. But I'm pretty certain the vast majority of us Democrats are gonna vote for the party nominee.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
Users browsing this forum: WILLIAMS5232