Conquer Club

Thank God Theres A Ron Paul

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Voting for Ron Paul

 
Total votes : 0

Postby got tonkaed on Sun Oct 14, 2007 9:57 pm

Tyr wrote:most anti-pauls would say he wants to eliminate the dep. of edu. and he wants to get rid of entitlement programs. but those arent necessarily bad points


i would say those are pretty bad points....a lot of that money goes to fairly good stuff.
User avatar
Cadet got tonkaed
 
Posts: 5034
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Detroit

Postby xtratabasco on Sun Oct 14, 2007 10:18 pm

got tonkaed wrote:
Tyr wrote:most anti-pauls would say he wants to eliminate the dep. of edu. and he wants to get rid of entitlement programs. but those arent necessarily bad points


i would say those are pretty bad points....a lot of that money goes to fairly good stuff.



what like gendor free bathrooms (google it) or Columbine high school where the students and teachers die and the SWAT TEAMS stand down....didnt that just happen recently???

what about all the high school grads that cant read???
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby got tonkaed on Sun Oct 14, 2007 10:27 pm

xtratabasco wrote:
got tonkaed wrote:
Tyr wrote:most anti-pauls would say he wants to eliminate the dep. of edu. and he wants to get rid of entitlement programs. but those arent necessarily bad points


i would say those are pretty bad points....a lot of that money goes to fairly good stuff.



what like gendor free bathrooms (google it) or Columbine high school where the students and teachers die and the SWAT TEAMS stand down....didnt that just happen recently???

what about all the high school grads that cant read???


im just saying, if you get rid of all that entitlement money, a lot of people cant do college and a lot of people cant do a lot of the things that many different education programs provide.

when you talk about improving peoples lives, most people think you need ot improve education. If your going to do, getting rid of a lot of the current money that reaches a lot of people does not seem like the way to do it.
User avatar
Cadet got tonkaed
 
Posts: 5034
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Detroit

Postby xtratabasco on Sun Oct 14, 2007 10:31 pm

got tonkaed wrote:
xtratabasco wrote:
got tonkaed wrote:
Tyr wrote:most anti-pauls would say he wants to eliminate the dep. of edu. and he wants to get rid of entitlement programs. but those arent necessarily bad points


i would say those are pretty bad points....a lot of that money goes to fairly good stuff.



what like gendor free bathrooms (google it) or Columbine high school where the students and teachers die and the SWAT TEAMS stand down....didnt that just happen recently???

what about all the high school grads that cant read???


im just saying, if you get rid of all that entitlement money, a lot of people cant do college and a lot of people cant do a lot of the things that many different education programs provide.

when you talk about improving peoples lives, most people think you need ot improve education. If your going to do, getting rid of a lot of the current money that reaches a lot of people does not seem like the way to do it.



well busch is sure helping scool kids get a new job...its called a hundred year WARRRRRRR. and so far all the democrats eat it up too.

hes even giving illegals who join to kill for the US, citizenship.











My choice is easy... Ron Paul
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby DaGip on Sun Oct 14, 2007 11:30 pm

xtratabasco wrote:
got tonkaed wrote:
xtratabasco wrote:
got tonkaed wrote:
Tyr wrote:most anti-pauls would say he wants to eliminate the dep. of edu. and he wants to get rid of entitlement programs. but those arent necessarily bad points


i would say those are pretty bad points....a lot of that money goes to fairly good stuff.



what like gendor free bathrooms (google it) or Columbine high school where the students and teachers die and the SWAT TEAMS stand down....didnt that just happen recently???

what about all the high school grads that cant read???


My Uncle was the Superintendant of the Schools of SouthDakota. That means that he was in charge of running ALL the schools in the state! He discussed with me the "No Child Left Behind" and commented that it was doing more harm than good for the schools and for the children.

Bush sucks! Clinton blows!

Vote Ron Paul!

im just saying, if you get rid of all that entitlement money, a lot of people cant do college and a lot of people cant do a lot of the things that many different education programs provide.

when you talk about improving peoples lives, most people think you need ot improve education. If your going to do, getting rid of a lot of the current money that reaches a lot of people does not seem like the way to do it.



well busch is sure helping scool kids get a new job...its called a hundred year WARRRRRRR. and so far all the democrats eat it up too.

hes even giving illegals who join to kill for the US, citizenship.











My choice is easy... Ron Paul
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class DaGip
 
Posts: 4047
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:48 am
Location: Watertown, South Dakota

Postby jay_a2j on Fri Oct 19, 2007 11:04 pm

The more I research, the more I like him. Ron Paul '08!


Why?



Watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWfIhFhelm8
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Lieutenant jay_a2j
 
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Postby muy_thaiguy on Fri Oct 19, 2007 11:09 pm

I guess I'll vote for him. BUT! If he does not hold up to his platform, there goes my support. Even though I don't agree with some of his stuff, I guess I will.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby OnlyAmbrose on Fri Oct 19, 2007 11:15 pm

muy_thaiguy wrote:I guess I'll vote for him. BUT! If he does not hold up to his platform, there goes my support. Even though I don't agree with some of his stuff, I guess I will.


This guy has held to his platform since the '70s.

We had our first debate today.

It was... THE most amazing experience ever. Long story short, I won. Our mock election has a blog, and to quote one blogger:

The Republican debate today only demonstrated what those close to Ron Paul knew...he is in it to WIN!! He didn't shy away from the issues and use prefabricated responses like Thompson...he spoke from the ♥. The passion with which Mr. Paul spoke was utterly inspiring and even led one young woman to cry out, "Have my children Ron Paul!" I'm sorry ladies, he has been happily married for 50 years...but he will still ♥ you like all Americans.


This guy is so solid on the issues, it's ridiculous. I feel bad for my classmates who have to play the other Republicans. Their candidates just don't have any ground to stand on.
"The Nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools."
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class OnlyAmbrose
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:53 pm

Postby muy_thaiguy on Fri Oct 19, 2007 11:18 pm

OnlyAmbrose wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:I guess I'll vote for him. BUT! If he does not hold up to his platform, there goes my support. Even though I don't agree with some of his stuff, I guess I will.


This guy has held to his platform since the '70s.

We had our first debate today.

It was... THE most amazing experience ever. Long story short, I won. Our mock election has a blog, and to quote one blogger:

The Republican debate today only demonstrated what those close to Ron Paul knew...he is in it to WIN!! He didn't shy away from the issues and use prefabricated responses like Thompson...he spoke from the ♥. The passion with which Mr. Paul spoke was utterly inspiring and even led one young woman to cry out, "Have my children Ron Paul!" I'm sorry ladies, he has been happily married for 50 years...but he will still ♥ you like all Americans.


This guy is so solid on the issues, it's ridiculous. I feel bad for my classmates who have to play the other Republicans. Their candidates just don't have any ground to stand on.
If he makes it to office, we will see. I will hold you all to your words on this, remember that. But don't expect my support if he legalizes marijuana and other drugs. That should go down to the states, not a Federal decsion.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby OnlyAmbrose on Fri Oct 19, 2007 11:29 pm

muy_thaiguy wrote:
OnlyAmbrose wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:I guess I'll vote for him. BUT! If he does not hold up to his platform, there goes my support. Even though I don't agree with some of his stuff, I guess I will.


This guy has held to his platform since the '70s.

We had our first debate today.

It was... THE most amazing experience ever. Long story short, I won. Our mock election has a blog, and to quote one blogger:

The Republican debate today only demonstrated what those close to Ron Paul knew...he is in it to WIN!! He didn't shy away from the issues and use prefabricated responses like Thompson...he spoke from the ♥. The passion with which Mr. Paul spoke was utterly inspiring and even led one young woman to cry out, "Have my children Ron Paul!" I'm sorry ladies, he has been happily married for 50 years...but he will still ♥ you like all Americans.


This guy is so solid on the issues, it's ridiculous. I feel bad for my classmates who have to play the other Republicans. Their candidates just don't have any ground to stand on.
If he makes it to office, we will see. I will hold you all to your words on this, remember that. But don't expect my support if he legalizes marijuana and other drugs. That should go down to the states, not a Federal decsion.


How can it become a matter of the states? The war on drugs is a FEDERAL war on drugs. Repealing it can only be done by the federal government.
"The Nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools."
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class OnlyAmbrose
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:53 pm

Postby xtratabasco on Sat Oct 20, 2007 1:29 am

OnlyAmbrose wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
OnlyAmbrose wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:I guess I'll vote for him. BUT! If he does not hold up to his platform, there goes my support. Even though I don't agree with some of his stuff, I guess I will.


This guy has held to his platform since the '70s.

We had our first debate today.

It was... THE most amazing experience ever. Long story short, I won. Our mock election has a blog, and to quote one blogger:

The Republican debate today only demonstrated what those close to Ron Paul knew...he is in it to WIN!! He didn't shy away from the issues and use prefabricated responses like Thompson...he spoke from the ♥. The passion with which Mr. Paul spoke was utterly inspiring and even led one young woman to cry out, "Have my children Ron Paul!" I'm sorry ladies, he has been happily married for 50 years...but he will still ♥ you like all Americans.


This guy is so solid on the issues, it's ridiculous. I feel bad for my classmates who have to play the other Republicans. Their candidates just don't have any ground to stand on.
If he makes it to office, we will see. I will hold you all to your words on this, remember that. But don't expect my support if he legalizes marijuana and other drugs. That should go down to the states, not a Federal decsion.


How can it become a matter of the states? The war on drugs is a FEDERAL war on drugs. Repealing it can only be done by the federal government.



you dont know about the US Constitution do you.


when the forfathers set up this government the city/town/county then the state ran thing, the FEDS were last.....

now it has been distorted so the FEDS rules all, but the 14th amendment is supposed to keep the States rights FIRST and ABOVE ALL.

That is why we are living in tyranny and chaos esp. with Bush doing what ever he wants....

dont you get it.....we are living in the Matrix and have been for over 150 years.


Ron Paul is the only one that can change things around.


if rudi or hillary wins it will just be more wars, more lies and more traitors running things....a criminal mafia if you will, with the militarized police state to back them up.
Last edited by xtratabasco on Sat Oct 20, 2007 1:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby Iliad on Sat Oct 20, 2007 1:30 am

xtratabasco wrote:
OnlyAmbrose wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
OnlyAmbrose wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:I guess I'll vote for him. BUT! If he does not hold up to his platform, there goes my support. Even though I don't agree with some of his stuff, I guess I will.


This guy has held to his platform since the '70s.

We had our first debate today.

It was... THE most amazing experience ever. Long story short, I won. Our mock election has a blog, and to quote one blogger:

The Republican debate today only demonstrated what those close to Ron Paul knew...he is in it to WIN!! He didn't shy away from the issues and use prefabricated responses like Thompson...he spoke from the ♥. The passion with which Mr. Paul spoke was utterly inspiring and even led one young woman to cry out, "Have my children Ron Paul!" I'm sorry ladies, he has been happily married for 50 years...but he will still ♥ you like all Americans.


This guy is so solid on the issues, it's ridiculous. I feel bad for my classmates who have to play the other Republicans. Their candidates just don't have any ground to stand on.
If he makes it to office, we will see. I will hold you all to your words on this, remember that. But don't expect my support if he legalizes marijuana and other drugs. That should go down to the states, not a Federal decsion.


How can it become a matter of the states? The war on drugs is a FEDERAL war on drugs. Repealing it can only be done by the federal government.



you dont know about the US Constitution do you.


when the forfathers set up this government the city/town/county then the state ran thing, the FEDS were last.....

now it has been distorted so the FEDS rules all, but the 14th amendment is supposed to keep the States rights FIRST and ABOVE ALL.

That is why we are living in tyranny and chaos esp. with Bush doing what ever he wants....

dont you get it.....we are living in the Matrix and have been for over 150 years.
This is getting more unreal by the post!
User avatar
Private 1st Class Iliad
 
Posts: 10394
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 am

Postby xtratabasco on Sat Oct 20, 2007 1:35 am

Iliad wrote:
xtratabasco wrote:
OnlyAmbrose wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
OnlyAmbrose wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:I guess I'll vote for him. BUT! If he does not hold up to his platform, there goes my support. Even though I don't agree with some of his stuff, I guess I will.


This guy has held to his platform since the '70s.

We had our first debate today.

It was... THE most amazing experience ever. Long story short, I won. Our mock election has a blog, and to quote one blogger:

The Republican debate today only demonstrated what those close to Ron Paul knew...he is in it to WIN!! He didn't shy away from the issues and use prefabricated responses like Thompson...he spoke from the ♥. The passion with which Mr. Paul spoke was utterly inspiring and even led one young woman to cry out, "Have my children Ron Paul!" I'm sorry ladies, he has been happily married for 50 years...but he will still ♥ you like all Americans.


This guy is so solid on the issues, it's ridiculous. I feel bad for my classmates who have to play the other Republicans. Their candidates just don't have any ground to stand on.
If he makes it to office, we will see. I will hold you all to your words on this, remember that. But don't expect my support if he legalizes marijuana and other drugs. That should go down to the states, not a Federal decsion.


How can it become a matter of the states? The war on drugs is a FEDERAL war on drugs. Repealing it can only be done by the federal government.



you dont know about the US Constitution do you.


when the forfathers set up this government the city/town/county then the state ran thing, the FEDS were last.....

now it has been distorted so the FEDS rules all, but the 14th amendment is supposed to keep the States rights FIRST and ABOVE ALL.

That is why we are living in tyranny and chaos esp. with Bush doing what ever he wants....

dont you get it.....we are living in the Matrix and have been for over 150 years.
This is getting more unreal by the post!



only for you and the other bon-bon eaters.


that is why Ron Paul wants to get rid of the

IRS
FBI
CIA
BATF
THE GOVERNMENT RAN SCHOOL SYSTEM
WELFARE
MOST ALL GOVERNMENT DEPTS.

The borders will be shut down, and the only real wars that we fight will be those where were attacked.


its that simple


now get back to your sitcoms and shopping you obviously havent been paying attention and think rudi or hillary are gonna keep this sinking ship afloat
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby AlgyTaylor on Sat Oct 20, 2007 1:53 am

xtratabasco wrote:
unriggable wrote:




anti gun


Guns kill people




I can back up everything I posted, but Im not gonna do your research you lazy a-hole, but I will respond to your brain dead thinking on this one.


I think youve got a couple screws loose.


Gun Violence vs. Killer Doctors Below.

Doctors:
(A) The number of doctors in the U.S. is 700,000
(B) Accidental deaths caused by physicians per year are 120,000
(C) Accidental deaths per physician is 17.14%

(Statistics courtesy of the U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Services)

************************************

Guns:
( A) The number of gun owners in the U.S. is 80,000,000 (yes that's 80
million)
(B) The number of accidental gun deaths per year, all age groups, is 1,500
(C) The number of accidental deaths per gun owner is 0.001875%

(Statistics courtesy of the FBI)

...................................................

So statistically, doctors are approximately 9,000 times more dangerous than
gun owners.

Remember, guns don't kill people, doctors do.

FACT: NOT EVERYONE HAS A GUN, BUT ALMOST EVERYONE
HAS AT LEAST ONE DOCTOR.

Please alert your friends to this alarming threat. We must ban doctors
before this gets completely out of hand!

Out of concern for the public at large, I have withheld statistics on
lawyers for fear the shock would cause people to panic and seek medical attention.

No! Guns don't people, death kills people. 100% of dead people have died from death, whereas only 0.00000094% have died from guns. Therefore we should legalise guns and make death illegal. Then nobody would die.
Corporal AlgyTaylor
 
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Liverpool, UK

!

Postby AlgyTaylor on Sat Oct 20, 2007 1:56 am

xtratabasco wrote:only for you and the other bon-bon eaters.


that is why Ron Paul wants to get rid of the

IRS
FBI
CIA
BATF
THE GOVERNMENT RAN SCHOOL SYSTEM
WELFARE
MOST ALL GOVERNMENT DEPTS.

The borders will be shut down, and the only real wars that we fight will be those where were attacked.


its that simple


now get back to your sitcoms and shopping you obviously havent been paying attention and think rudi or hillary are gonna keep this sinking ship afloat

Fooking. Hell.

Sounds like a right prick to me.
Corporal AlgyTaylor
 
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Liverpool, UK

Postby Neutrino on Sat Oct 20, 2007 2:59 am

xtratabasco wrote:

only for you and the other bon-bon eaters.


that is why Ron Paul wants to get rid of the

IRS
FBI
CIA
BATF
THE GOVERNMENT RAN SCHOOL SYSTEM
WELFARE
MOST ALL GOVERNMENT DEPTS.

The borders will be shut down, and the only real wars that we fight will be those where were attacked.


its that simple


now get back to your sitcoms and shopping you obviously havent been paying attention and think rudi or hillary are gonna keep this sinking ship afloat


Question: exactly what good will Ron Paul do if we are all traped in the Matrix, as you seem to believe? Unless he has an alter ego called Neo, I don't think he's going to make a huge amount of difference.

Oh, and for a Ron Paul supporter who isn't Xtra: I don't know much about Ron Paul (or US politics in general), but is what Xtra says about Ron Paul advocating an isolationist state true? If so, why do you consider this to be a good idea? :?
We own all your helmets, we own all your shoes, we own all your generals. Touch us and you loooose...

The Rogue State!
User avatar
Corporal Neutrino
 
Posts: 2693
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 2:53 am
Location: Combating the threat of dihydrogen monoxide.

Postby DaGip on Sat Oct 20, 2007 5:34 am

Neutrino wrote:
xtratabasco wrote:

only for you and the other bon-bon eaters.


that is why Ron Paul wants to get rid of the

IRS
FBI
CIA
BATF
THE GOVERNMENT RAN SCHOOL SYSTEM
WELFARE
MOST ALL GOVERNMENT DEPTS.

The borders will be shut down, and the only real wars that we fight will be those where were attacked.


its that simple


now get back to your sitcoms and shopping you obviously havent been paying attention and think rudi or hillary are gonna keep this sinking ship afloat


Question: exactly what good will Ron Paul do if we are all traped in the Matrix, as you seem to believe? Unless he has an alter ego called Neo, I don't think he's going to make a huge amount of difference.

Oh, and for a Ron Paul supporter who isn't Xtra: I don't know much about Ron Paul (or US politics in general), but is what Xtra says about Ron Paul advocating an isolationist state true? If so, why do you consider this to be a good idea? :?


Well, apparently you are not American. Americans notoriously hate government (or so we say) and under the Constitution the power of the government is left in the hands of the people...not the government itself. If someone ever claimed him or herself King or Queen or Emperor(ess)...Americans would grab their guns and say: "f*ck this shit!"...or so we think. It could very well be that America has already caved in to tyranny, and anybody that tries to advocate the principles of the Constitution are considered imbeciles, crackpots, nutjobs, and are totally laughed at and deviously thought the fool. The truth is that when FOXNEWS DEBATE interrogators laughed and scoffed at Ron Paul, they were doing it out of ignorance. They are trapped in the LIE and have fooled themselves into thinking it is TRUTH. The American Constitution is the law of our land and therefore should be considered the truth and all other suggestions to the contrary should be held as falsehoods until the power of the people is willing to change its manifest. Has that time come? What is so inherently wrong with the Constitution that it is being sought by the majority of people to circumvent its principles and its rights to liberty? It is not! The majority of Americans are not seeking to circumvent one letter from the Constitution of the United States. It is being sought to disembowel its liberties to but a select few.

If you are not American, then you should be praying that Ron Paul does become President. If he does not, and the Federal government goes unchecked...the affects are already being seen worldwide...this set of circumstances would only escalate. Larger government. More globalization of what the American government thinks is right. Yes, less government is a good thing. I am sorry that you would not agree with this. Sometimes the government causes more strife and burden than if the people were left to their own vice and moralities.

To totally abolish the Fed would cause a polarization, as those who have gained power through it would never hand it over into the hands of which it rightly belongs...the hands of The People. But we have friends, and they are starting to pop up. And you will see, more and more will have little lights coming on inside their heads and they too will step forward in the cause of Liberty for the People By the People.

Anyway, hope that kind of answers your question. As for me, I am still a Republican and I am voting Ron Paul!
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class DaGip
 
Posts: 4047
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:48 am
Location: Watertown, South Dakota

Postby Coleman on Sat Oct 20, 2007 5:41 am

Neutrino wrote:Oh, and for a Ron Paul supporter who isn't Xtra: I don't know much about Ron Paul (or US politics in general), but is what Xtra says about Ron Paul advocating an isolationist state true? If so, why do you consider this to be a good idea? :?
Our country was founded to be isolationist. Our founders were incredibly brilliant people. I would say this is a brilliant idea.

Although I secretly hope eventually the idea that open voting based on age alone being a fair and just way to decide things will come to light as being a complete load of shit and the entire government system will be redone to be something sane.

People thinking Miami is a state might not be the best candidates for voting...
Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
Sergeant Coleman
 
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: Midwest

Postby got tonkaed on Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:13 am

Coleman wrote:
Neutrino wrote:Oh, and for a Ron Paul supporter who isn't Xtra: I don't know much about Ron Paul (or US politics in general), but is what Xtra says about Ron Paul advocating an isolationist state true? If so, why do you consider this to be a good idea? :?
Our country was founded to be isolationist. Our founders were incredibly brilliant people. I would say this is a brilliant idea.

Although I secretly hope eventually the idea that open voting based on age alone being a fair and just way to decide things will come to light as being a complete load of shit and the entire government system will be redone to be something sane.

People thinking Miami is a state might not be the best candidates for voting...


The idea that by being founded under isolationist ideals (a totally true argument) equates to the notion that we need to revert to those ideas, is frankly a silly way to look at foreign policy. If you in any way want to remain at the top of the global food chain...and if you dont i suppose there is less of a problem, but you simply cannot say, alright we are going to do our own thing now. The globalization process has made the world markets far too interconnected, to have any kind of policy such as this be even worth talking about. People are going to assume we need to have international interest, and in some cases (as much as i hate it) a military to take care of the interest when necessary.

If you want to take your ball and go home for a while thats fine, but that will not help the country as a whole, especially when we are becoming increasingly incompetitive vs other countries in the global labor market, and will only continue this pattern as china and india continue to move forward.
User avatar
Cadet got tonkaed
 
Posts: 5034
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Detroit

Postby xtratabasco on Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:34 am

yes we want to take our ball and go home, that will include stop building empirers and killing millions of innocent people over lies.




here is an interview for you non believers

http://prisonplanet.tv/audio/231105roberts.htm

it starts off with torture and gets into the government


DaGip will appriciate Dr. Roberts
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby jay_a2j on Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:51 am

Neutrino wrote:Question: Unless he has an alter ego called Neo, I don't think he's going to make a huge amount of difference.





If Ron Paul doesn't make a difference NO ONE else is. So what? Vote for the same old stuff? For more info. on Ron Paul google him on the web or even better watch his debates google Ron Paul (Google video's)
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Lieutenant jay_a2j
 
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Postby unriggable on Sat Oct 20, 2007 11:04 am

jay_a2j wrote:
Neutrino wrote:Question: Unless he has an alter ego called Neo, I don't think he's going to make a huge amount of difference.





If Ron Paul doesn't make a difference NO ONE else is. So what? Vote for the same old stuff? For more info. on Ron Paul google him on the web or even better watch his debates google Ron Paul (Google video's)


Anybody who opposes the UN isn't going to be making a whole bunch of difference.
Image
User avatar
Cook unriggable
 
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Postby muy_thaiguy on Sat Oct 20, 2007 11:07 am

unriggable wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
Neutrino wrote:Question: Unless he has an alter ego called Neo, I don't think he's going to make a huge amount of difference.





If Ron Paul doesn't make a difference NO ONE else is. So what? Vote for the same old stuff? For more info. on Ron Paul google him on the web or even better watch his debates google Ron Paul (Google video's)


Anybody who opposes the UN isn't going to be making a whole bunch of difference.
Not like the UN has done a whole lot, except stand by and watch atrocities like a theater play.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby unriggable on Sat Oct 20, 2007 11:09 am

muy_thaiguy wrote:
unriggable wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
Neutrino wrote:Question: Unless he has an alter ego called Neo, I don't think he's going to make a huge amount of difference.





If Ron Paul doesn't make a difference NO ONE else is. So what? Vote for the same old stuff? For more info. on Ron Paul google him on the web or even better watch his debates google Ron Paul (Google video's)


Anybody who opposes the UN isn't going to be making a whole bunch of difference.
Not like the UN has done a whole lot, except stand by and watch atrocities like a theater play.


And give billions in food and such.
Image
User avatar
Cook unriggable
 
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Postby DaGip on Sat Oct 20, 2007 12:26 pm

xtratabasco wrote:yes we want to take our ball and go home, that will include stop building empirers and killing millions of innocent people over lies.




here is an interview for you non believers

http://prisonplanet.tv/audio/231105roberts.htm

it starts off with torture and gets into the government


DaGip will appriciate Dr. Roberts


Of course I appriciate Dr. Roberts! He used to work for me! LOL :lol:

But let's not forget Alexander Haig, Jr. He too has outspoken (although catiously) against the Neo-Con agenda. Many Reagan Republicans hate the Bush Adminstration, Roberts is not the only one.

http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2006 ... -iraq.html

This CNN transcript of ALexander Haig's interview with Wolf BLitzer says it all...even though he doesn't come out and indicates Bush as a Neo COn...but he does mention Cheney.

Hurry and get a clue, if you haven't already. Republicans hate NEO CONS!

Vote Ron Paul!
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class DaGip
 
Posts: 4047
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:48 am
Location: Watertown, South Dakota

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users