sam_levi_11 wrote:usain bolt has just smashed the world record in the 200m. That guy is incredible
Seriously, that was amazing. Saw him in the 4x100 today and he was so fucking fast.
Moderator: Community Team
sam_levi_11 wrote:usain bolt has just smashed the world record in the 200m. That guy is incredible





Juan_Bottom wrote:sam_levi_11 wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:jiminski wrote:and that GB is on the up again
Our TV doesn't cover GB. All I know is that they won a bike race, an that they aren't in the top 5 for medal count. How are they doing? And what's their events?
ACTUALLY, we are third in the medal table, we have the highest ever medal count in....sumin, and a female swimmer, becky adlington i think shes called, broke two world records and got 2 golds.
I can still remember... when I posted that it went:
1) USA
2) China
3) Australia
4) France
5) Russian Fed.
Bob Costas give us the count like every four hours
Good for you guys though! I wonder if GB was like 6th place and waiting for their events or something.... Does GB and France still have an olympic rivalry? Also, if you guys could take China down the USA would appreciate it....





























Huckleberryhound wrote:What a strange medals table you all use. So, a country with 20 bronze medals, rates higher than a country with 19 Gold (a theoretical example) ?





Matroshka wrote:Huckleberryhound wrote:What a strange medals table you all use. So, a country with 20 bronze medals, rates higher than a country with 19 Gold (a theoretical example) ?
In a list of the total medal count? I think so yeah. It wasn't a who is better than who list.






sam_levi_11 wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:jiminski wrote:and that GB is on the up again
Our TV doesn't cover GB. All I know is that they won a bike race, an that they aren't in the top 5 for medal count. How are they doing? And what's their events?
ACTUALLY, we are third in the medal table, we have the highest ever medal count in....sumin, and a female swimmer, becky adlington i think shes called, broke two world records and got 2 golds.














Matroshka wrote:I'm not sure why you guys are so bitter about this. It was a medal count (total medals).
But since someone mentioned it, I decided to put point values on the medals. 3 for Gold, 2 for Silver, and 1 for Bronze. The points come out to this:
China: 200
USA: 200
GB: 91









DAZMCFC wrote:Matroshka wrote:I'm not sure why you guys are so bitter about this. It was a medal count (total medals).
But since someone mentioned it, I decided to put point values on the medals. 3 for Gold, 2 for Silver, and 1 for Bronze. The points come out to this:
China: 200
USA: 200
GB: 91
that does not hide the fact that USA manipulated the table so they could assume to be top. it's alright, if it keeps the money rolling in from the sponsors and Joe public don't really get it. USA USA USA.


















Matroshka wrote:I'm not sure why you guys are so bitter about this. It was a medal count (total medals).







Bones2484 wrote:DAZMCFC wrote:Matroshka wrote:I'm not sure why you guys are so bitter about this. It was a medal count (total medals).
But since someone mentioned it, I decided to put point values on the medals. 3 for Gold, 2 for Silver, and 1 for Bronze. The points come out to this:
China: 200
USA: 200
GB: 91
that does not hide the fact that USA manipulated the table so they could assume to be top. it's alright, if it keeps the money rolling in from the sponsors and Joe public don't really get it. USA USA USA.
Get over it. There is no "official table". There is no "official competition" to see which country can get the most of anything.
































Matroshka wrote:I'm guessing this is the one you are talking about, right?
http://results.beijing2008.cn/WRM/ENG/INF/GL/95A/GL0000000.shtml
Did you see the far right side? Even this one has ranking by totals.


Bones2484 wrote:Thus, there is no official rankings because the IOC does not recognize any.





Bones2484 wrote:“ The International Olympic Committee (IOC) does not recognise global ranking per country; the medal tables are displayed for information only. Furthermore, the results that we publish are official and are taken from the "Official Report" - a document published for each Olympic Games by the Organising Committee. However, for the first Olympic Games (until Antwerp in 1920), it is difficult to give the exact number of medals awarded to some countries, due to the fact that teams were composed of athletes from different countries. The medal tables by country are based on the number of medals won, with gold medals taking priority over silver and bronze. A team victory counts as one medal. ”
—International Olympic Committee[6]
Thus, there is no official rankings because the IOC does not recognize any.


Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.









strike wolf wrote:I would say that if there was a rating system the fairest would be the one mentioned earlier in this thread (I can't remember who said it) which would leave it as gold = 3 points; silver =2; and bronze =1.


















Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.









strike wolf wrote:Yes, truly, maybe we should just watch for the thrill of the games




















Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.









Snorri1234 wrote:strike wolf wrote:Yes, truly, maybe we should just watch for the thrill of the games
It's how I do it. If there is noone from my country in the event I just cheer on for the cheer fun. Watching the 100m or 200m events was amazing. Seeing Usain Bolt in a sprint is awesome, no matter what country you're from.






Users browsing this forum: No registered users