I do not give a rats ass, what you think .john9blue wrote:I wasn't mocking anyone, dave.
And I think you're overreacting, pork...

Moderator: Community Team
I do not give a rats ass, what you think .john9blue wrote:I wasn't mocking anyone, dave.
And I think you're overreacting, pork...
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
You do not KNOW your ass from a hole in the ground.john9blue wrote:Okay then, I'll pretend to know things that I don't know, like most people in this forum.
I KNOW you're overreacting, pork.
the.killing.44 wrote:porkenbeans should be a mod.
He flames you, then includes aor
, a la the token "
".
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Army of GOD wrote:Go f*** yourself and then die a horrible death because nobody loves you.![]()
(I included theso it's ok!!)
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
porkenbeans wrote:AOG, aren't you a little old for that baby cartoon avi ?
porkenbeans wrote:AOG, aren't you a little old for that baby cartoon avi ?
porkenbeans wrote:No, I have read the thread, and am on your side on this issue. It's just that I had to respond to that big pile of shit, that is being spread lately.pimpdave wrote:porkenbeans wrote:The rig in question is, er (WAS) an experimental/exploratory well. Toilets and trains are NOT a valid comparison at all. They have a proven track record, of being relatively safe, you moron.PLAYER57832 wrote:No other tankers were stopped after the Exxon Valdese accident and all trains are not stopped after a train wreck, therefore it was wrong to halt drilling while drilling rules and procedures are reviewed for safety.
Simlar analogy -- People in rural areas are allowed to have pit toilets, therefore every skyrise in New York should be allowed to do the same.
The moratorium is only on a few similar deep water, exploratory wells. This "accident" has proven without a shadow of a doubt, that a blow out in these depths, can not be fixed with the current technology, so, barring closing them down permanently, the next 6 months will be used to inspect and evaluate these deep water wells. Seems like a pretty rational, and intelligent thing to do, if you ask me. But then again, I am NOT a mindless dumbfuck Republican drone.
Looks like someone doesn't get the point of this thread. Please go read the first page.
I stand corrected.Timminz wrote:porkenbeans wrote:No, I have read the thread, and am on your side on this issue. It's just that I had to respond to that big pile of shit, that is being spread lately.pimpdave wrote:porkenbeans wrote:The rig in question is, er (WAS) an experimental/exploratory well. Toilets and trains are NOT a valid comparison at all. They have a proven track record, of being relatively safe, you moron.PLAYER57832 wrote:No other tankers were stopped after the Exxon Valdese accident and all trains are not stopped after a train wreck, therefore it was wrong to halt drilling while drilling rules and procedures are reviewed for safety.
Simlar analogy -- People in rural areas are allowed to have pit toilets, therefore every skyrise in New York should be allowed to do the same.
The moratorium is only on a few similar deep water, exploratory wells. This "accident" has proven without a shadow of a doubt, that a blow out in these depths, can not be fixed with the current technology, so, barring closing them down permanently, the next 6 months will be used to inspect and evaluate these deep water wells. Seems like a pretty rational, and intelligent thing to do, if you ask me. But then again, I am NOT a mindless dumbfuck Republican drone.
Looks like someone doesn't get the point of this thread. Please go read the first page.
And in the process, you decided to call PLAYER a "moron", even though you seem to agree with her, which would indicate to me that you don't understand what's going on in this thread.
ps. You agree with her.
InkL0sed wrote:porkenbeans wrote:AOG, aren't you a little old for that baby cartoon avi ?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users