Moderator: Community Team



















grifftron wrote:nagerous wrote:Well, some of the crowd are on the pitch
Look at that nasty mullet! It will be a fun game.
-griff

















































































































parker4s wrote:TEVEZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ I dont care if it was offside.





























Timminz wrote:AT least neither of today's blown goal/no-goal calls haven't been deciders (yet).




















parker4s wrote:Haha just watch it buddy. Dude it doesnt even matter if we beat u by more than one.





























nietzsche wrote:you better shut the f*ck up now



















Timminz wrote:AT least neither of today's blown goal/no-goal calls haven't been deciders (yet).















the.killing.44 wrote:nietzsche wrote:you better shut the f*ck up now
Let him have his threesome with Ronaldo and Messi









obliterationX wrote:Timminz wrote:AT least neither of today's blown goal/no-goal calls haven't been deciders (yet).
Trust me to throw this into the mix being an Englishman, but although I appreciate how poor England's performance was, the momentum from drawing level 2-2 could have proved pivotal and would most likely have swung the game in England's favour. Regardless, these kinds of decision don't really need to happen. In his interview, Frank Lampard states that had the goal been rightfully given, it would have affected the teams totally.
It's just not necessary that a goal as blatent as Frank Lampard's should have been disallowed. It was a goal, and would have changed the game, not just because the teams would have gone in 2-2 at half time.









Users browsing this forum: No registered users