Moderator: Community Team
hahaha3hahaha wrote:Teflon Kris wrote:
I would hardly call it a study of behaviour, unless you would consider biology as a whole a study of behaviour.
Natural selection is more so behaviour than science. Also, didn't he ditch NS for lamarckism..? Which is again, science, but not really...
Frigidus wrote:If an individual organism picks up a certain personality trait over the course of its life it won't mean anything on the sort of timescale that evolution occurs in.
crispybits wrote:lol 387 pages (and that's before we start on this - only 230 pages, but even more of the joy of Lionz is contained within)
premio53 wrote:I don't know Einstein but he sure hit evolution in the head.
BigBallinStalin wrote:
Dramatic Reenactment of Artimis' Journey through this Thread.
Phatscotty wrote:sweet thread title
Artimis wrote:Hurrah! Page 50 completed, Noah's Ark must have been utilising Tardis technology to pack enough food for all 100,000 animals onboard for 40 days and 40 nights. Also Noah and his family were the very model of time and motion efficiency when it came to distributing the food and then removing the resultant crap afterwards.
crispybits wrote:Woodruff wrote:I'm beginning to believe that Viceroy subscribes to the theory that the banana is clear evidence that man was created rather than evolved. After all, look how perfectly the banana fits into the human hand.
For anyone who needs a laugh and hasn't seen it yet:
universalchiro wrote:Artimis wrote:Hurrah! Page 50 completed, Noah's Ark must have been utilising Tardis technology to pack enough food for all 100,000 animals onboard for 40 days and 40 nights. Also Noah and his family were the very model of time and motion efficiency when it came to distributing the food and then removing the resultant crap afterwards.
Go Artimis Go. I'm actually rooting for you to finish.
Your number of 100,000 animals on board the Ark, seems really high. Take dogs for example, if there are approximately 1,000 species of dog and all dogs are descendants of the wolf, wouldn't Noah just need a male and female wolf? Seems sufficient to me.
The Bible uses the word "kind", one male and one female of every kind. Mankind breaks kinds into different categories. So I'm thinking a "Kind" would be closer to a Kingdom classification.
Dukasaur wrote:universalchiro wrote:Artimis wrote:Hurrah! Page 50 completed, Noah's Ark must have been utilising Tardis technology to pack enough food for all 100,000 animals onboard for 40 days and 40 nights. Also Noah and his family were the very model of time and motion efficiency when it came to distributing the food and then removing the resultant crap afterwards.
Go Artimis Go. I'm actually rooting for you to finish.
Your number of 100,000 animals on board the Ark, seems really high. Take dogs for example, if there are approximately 1,000 species of dog and all dogs are descendants of the wolf, wouldn't Noah just need a male and female wolf? Seems sufficient to me.
The Bible uses the word "kind", one male and one female of every kind. Mankind breaks kinds into different categories. So I'm thinking a "Kind" would be closer to a Kingdom classification.
If you think evolution is a hoax, then dogs can't descend from wolves. You can't have it both ways.
Return to Out, out, brief candle!
Users browsing this forum: jonesthecurl