Best porn actress

[Army of GOD]

Any images of pornographic activity or nudity - nipples, areola, genitals, anuses etc - whether intended as artistic, erotic, pornographic or otherwise are not allowed.

Notice the words he uses..."pornographic activity or nudity". Shirtless males are, in my opinion, not considered engaging in pornographic activity nor nudity. It's ok for males to be shirtless in public. The fact that he uses "etc." means, by your logic, any amount of skin shown could be against the rules as well.

If it is ambiguous, we'll ask you to remove it anyway, so "It's a guy's nipple" isn't going to fly. You're just trying to be annoying at that point.

I think it's a pretty ridiculous set of rules, but saying that they aren't written the way they are is kind of silly too. That's what they say.

Did you read the qualifier? He said if it's ambiguous, THEN it won't fly.

[Symmetry]

Rules are made because judgement cannot be passed easily. So we do the easy thing, make rules and play by the rules.

The rule says no pussy and no female nipples so we avoid posting those. I understand your point tho. But you will get banned.

well if i get banned for posting a world famous masterpiece, a PAINTING in a none suggestive posture, it's trully funny.
And what is also very funny was symetry in another thread posting gay porn and that was ok because there were no genitals and if we say it's offensive we will be reported for bigotery.

when I was around 10 and I was going to an american school. we had a cut and paste art project and I just pasted a penis-shaped piece of paper on one of the characters that was in a strage position to have a laugh with a friend and that I was going to remove immediately; a girl saw that, reported it to the teacher who reported it to the principal who called my parents who had to pick me up ASAP from school and I had a whole brainwashing speech from the principal as if it was a criminal offense. Americans need to chill out with nudity seriously, when we see how big the porn industry is in the US it's just silly and it makes no sense.

To be fair, I have never posted gay porn. The closest I have ever come to that was posting a picture of two men kissing or of two men touching each other. I was asked to stop posting images that were hot sexy and NSFW by the moderators, and the thread title was changed accordingly so that such images as the OP asked for could no longer be posted without intentionally derailing the thread according to its new title, apparently without the consent of the poster who made the thread.

Well, yes, what you posted was not "technically" gay porn because of their so called written rules. you were on one extreme, offensive that cannot be punished and I'm on the other extreme, the non-offensive that can be punished.

My point is to ask if we cannot use common sense on a case to case basis when we meet grey areas instead of treating everything manicheanly with the written rules that obviously don't always make sense??

It wasn't technically porn, because it wasn't pornographic. No need to be mealy mouthed on this. You said I posted gay porn, now you say that I posted stuff that wasn't "technically" gay porn. This is a mealy mouthed accusation that I could equally apply to your last post- I can certainly say that your post above is not technically gay porn. More accurately, of course, I can say that it isn't gay porn at all.

Perhaps you would be so good as to clear up your accusation that I posted pornography on this forum. Hint- I did not.

[Symmetry]

Any images of pornographic activity or nudity - nipples, areola, genitals, anuses etc - whether intended as artistic, erotic, pornographic or otherwise are not allowed.

Notice the words he uses..."pornographic activity or nudity". Shirtless males are, in my opinion, not considered engaging in pornographic activity nor nudity. It's ok for males to be shirtless in public. The fact that he uses "etc." means, by your logic, any amount of skin shown could be against the rules as well.

If it is ambiguous, we'll ask you to remove it anyway, so "It's a guy's nipple" isn't going to fly. You're just trying to be annoying at that point.

I think it's a pretty ridiculous set of rules, but saying that they aren't written the way they are is kind of silly too. That's what they say.

Did you read the qualifier? He said if it's ambiguous, THEN it won't fly.

I read it very carefully, and nipples are mentioned very specifically as an example of nudity. Male or female nipples aren't mentioned. Just nipples. I'm not sure if you find that ambiguous, but if you do, there's always the rule that saying that male nipples are ok isn't an excuse.

[nietzsche]

I think that nowadays kids have access to porn everywhere, no matter how many nanny software you buy for the computer. And if you install those, they will develop unhealthy views because other kids will tell them what they saw. And they will have it in the cellphone. So what's the point?

I think the site tries to be politically correct.

To be honest, any censorship should be applied from our side, just to keep away from bad taste.

[Symmetry]

I think that nowadays kids have access to porn everywhere, no matter how many nanny software you buy for the computer. And if you install those, they will develop unhealthy views because other kids will tell them what they saw. And they will have it in the cellphone. So what's the point?

I think the site tries to be politically correct.

To be honest, any censorship should be applied from our side, just to keep away from bad taste.

This is pretty much my view. Clearly a small minority of posters were using the Hot Sexy and NSFW thread as sexual titillation. The sheer number of complaints that I received and continue to receive accusing me of "ruining" the thread, or as the poster above said- posting gay porn, kind of suggest that an image of a hot and sexy man, in a not safe for work picture was either ruinous for whatever purpose they took the thread as, or could be seen as pornographic as any of the previous pictures.

[betiko]

That is just what I'm saying. you knew how to play by the rules posting things that are not "technically" pornographic but that were clear images of 2 men in lust getting to it. You know how to double use the site's rules; it was not technically porn, and we are not allowed to say it's offensive because we can get accused of bigotery.
Lust is ok because it cannot be proved, but nipple can. so just blame it all on nudity!! wow nudity is bad even if sex is everywhere in our society!! nudity= kinky sex!!

So let's say posting people in a dungeon whipping each other with spikes and all dressed in leather is ok, but a world famous masterpiece cannot be shown because the artist made the sacriledge of representing a nude model?

Also are you kidding when you censor the genitals of michelangelo's David??? I've seen versions kind of like that in the US:

[CreepersWiener]

Did I mention Zusana Drabinova is awesome?

[Army of GOD]

Did I mention Zusana Drabinova is a man?

No, you failed to mention that.

[CreepersWiener]

Did I mention Zusana Drabinova is a man?

No, you failed to mention that.

Well, dear me! Let me mention it...SHE IS FRIGGIN' AWESOME! Just a beautiful tall voluptuous blonde woman having fun by herself with her fingers and some lotion (and from time to time a dildo)!

[Symmetry]

That is just what I'm saying. you knew how to play by the rules posting things that are not "technically" pornographic but that were clear images of 2 men in lust getting to it. You know how to double use the site's rules; it was not technically porn, and we are not allowed to say it's offensive because we can get accused of bigotery.
Lust is ok because it cannot be proved, but nipple can. so just blame it all on nudity!! wow nudity is bad even if sex is everywhere in our society!! nudity= kinky sex!!

So let's say posting people in a dungeon whipping each other with spikes and all dressed in leather is ok, but a world famous masterpiece cannot be shown because the artist made the sacriledge of representing a nude model?

Also are you kidding when you censor the genitals of michelangelo's David??? I've seen versions kind of like that in the US:

[img]http://wirefall.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/statue_of_david_censored.jpg/img]

Once again, it was not pornography, technically or otherwise. People kissing doesn't equal porn. As you say, you're accusing me of something for which you have no proof. I feel I've been fairly clear that I disagree with the rules as stated. Perhaps you could do me the favour of unequivocally saying that what I posted was not pornographic.

By unequivocally, I mean that you don't qualify it with "not technically", or "not according to the rules", or such qualifiers.

I have, as far as I am aware, also never censored Michaelangelo's David, itself a homoerotic image far beyond anything I've ever had the balls to post.

[CreepersWiener]

Did I mention Zusana Drabinova is a man?

No, you failed to mention that.

Well, dear me! Let me mention it...SHE IS FRIGGIN' AWESOME! Just a beautiful tall voluptuous blonde woman having fun by herself with her fingers and some lotion (and from time to time a dildo)!

OH MY! I can't help but repeat myself on this matter! The thread is about BEST PORN ACTRESS'...NOT What Constitutes Pornography In Threads...that need to go to a separate thread.

Now, let's see some more Zusana Drabinova (aka. Raylene Richards)!

[Symmetry]

Apologies, but if I see a post accusing me of posting pornography in these forums, I hope you understand that I feel I have a right of response. I also hope that you appreciate some of the doozies from Thailand I'll be posting later.

I assume this thread doesn't discriminate against people who identify as women.

[Army of GOD]

Symmetry, stop posting porn in these fora!

[CreepersWiener]

You know...it's getting harder and harder (no pun intended) to find photos of Zusana with clothes on!

[Symmetry]

Symmetry, stop posting porn in these fora!

I don't really understand what you mean. I kind of outlined why my posts weren't pornographic at all before.

[betiko]

Symmetry, stop posting porn in these fora!

I don't really understand what you mean. I kind of outlined why my posts weren't pornographic at all before.

Is it something you would show to kids? do you think it was apropriate? weren't the pictures explicit enough without these guys's dicks out to be considered as porn? they were snogging in a pornographic way, wereas a plain nude isn't necesairly pornographic. it was not "technically" pornographic because you take the rules in hand, but we all know it was, SIMPLY BECAUSE WE WOULDN'T WANT KIDS TO SEE IT. you also knew that lots of people would hate to see it so you posted it on purpose to then play the innocent.

anyway, i'll stop because i'm kind of trolling this thread (as symmetry did on the other), we exposed our opinions and none of them are going to change.

[Symmetry]

Symmetry, stop posting porn in these fora!

I don't really understand what you mean. I kind of outlined why my posts weren't pornographic at all before.

Is it something you would show to kids? do you think it was apropriate? weren't the pictures explicit enough without these guys's dicks out to be considered as porn? they were snogging in a pornographic way, wereas a plain nude isn't necesairly pornographic. it was not "technically" pornographic because you take the rules in hand, but we all know it was, SIMPLY BECAUSE WE WOULDN'T WANT KIDS TO SEE IT. you also knew that lots of people would hate to see it so you posted it on purpose to then play the innocent.

anyway, i'll stop because i'm kind of trolling this thread (as symmetry did on the other), we exposed our opinions and none of them are going to change.

Hmm, that's fair enough, I have no particular desire to derail this thread either, but I will address the points directed at me. My posts were appropriate as it was a thread for hot sexy and NSFW pictures while I was posting. As the thread has been changed to women only I have not posted any pictures.

The pictures I posted were not pornographic, unless you consider pictures under similar conditions of women posted in the topic to also be pornographic. You accused me of posting gay porn, and now seem to be backing away from your original accusation without simply apologising for it.

There is much on this forum that I wouldn't show to kids, but I'm unsure about why the hot sexy and NSFW pics that I posted should be singled out as opposed to the hot sexy and NSFW pics that others posted. Or are you still saying that I posted pornography, and further, that I was posting porn that kids can see?

That's not an allegation that I shrug off easily. If you genuinely feel that I'm posting gay porn for kids, that's a criminal matter.

[Army of GOD]

Seriously, stop posting porn Symmetry. You're a disgrace.

[CreepersWiener]

Ashlynn Brooke is good at hardcore stuff. She has an innocent quality that completely disappears during her acting.

[Symmetry]

Seriously, stop posting porn Symmetry. You're a disgrace.

The picture that received the most objections was that of two men kissing. I'd post it again here, as of course, it's relevant and not against the rules, but it would receive more complaints than the mods need and would take attention away from Creepers' important work judging the acting skills of hardcore pornographers, which likely will receive no complaints.

It's unfortunate that posting a simple image of two men kissing can be viewed as pornography by posters like Betiko, who also worries that children might see it and perhaps think that it's something they shouldn't hate.

Don't buy into his arguments AOG, this is a poster who can't bring himself to honestly apologise for accusing me of posting pornography.

[Army of GOD]

No, seriously Symmetry. Don't post porn. Think of the children.

[CreepersWiener]

...it would receive more complaints than the mods need and would take attention away from Creepers' important work judging the acting skills of hardcore pornographers, which likely will receive no complaints.

And why should it? I am sticking with the subject at hand: Best Porn Actress. However, you are not providing anything constructive to this thread; you are just being an annoying a'hole over some bs that happened awhile back. I don't think that this thread is the place for you to bring that up and I would ask that you cease and create a new thread for the subject that you are discussing with other members. I, on the other hand, am focusing on Porn Actress'.

Now, when it comes to talented brunettes, Jenna Haze really knows how to get the job done! She has one of those "girl from the office" looks and can really scream and talk dirty during sex. Though I am more partial to larger breasts, Jenna is not entirely flat...and leaves you with the impression of someone that is very healthy and perhaps did a lot of track and field when growing up. Yes, Jenna is a surefire winner and deserves to be ranked among the best!

[Symmetry]

...it would receive more complaints than the mods need and would take attention away from Creepers' important work judging the acting skills of hardcore pornographers, which likely will receive no complaints.

And why should it? I am sticking with the subject at hand: Best Porn Actress. However, you are not providing anything constructive to this thread; you are just being an annoying a'hole over some bs that happened awhile back. I don't think that this thread is the place for you to bring that up and I would ask that you cease and create a new thread for the subject that you are discussing with other members. I, on the other hand, am focusing on Porn Actress'.

Now, when it comes to talented brunettes, Jenna Haze really knows how to get the job done! She has one of those "girl from the office" looks and can really scream and talk dirty during sex. Though I am more partial to larger breasts, Jenna is not entirely flat...and leaves you with the impression of someone that is very healthy and perhaps did a lot of track and field when growing up. Yes, Jenna is a surefire winner and deserves to be ranked among the best!

[img]http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y189/keenedder/25k/jenna-haze-thong.jpg/img]

I'm responding to accusations made about me in this thread. Perhaps your issue should be with the people accusing me of violating the rules of this site, rather than the responses to these allegations. Let's be absolutely clear on this, Betiko is saying that I posted gay pornography that kids could openly view. That wasn't something that happened awhile back, it occurred in this thread a few posts ago.

If you are unhappy with this thread being used to throw out allegations that I'm posting pornography for children, perhaps you can take it up with the poster in question, rather than asking me not to respond to those allegations or calling me an asshole for saying that those allegations are false.

[saxitoxin]

...it would receive more complaints than the mods need and would take attention away from Creepers' important work judging the acting skills of hardcore pornographers, which likely will receive no complaints.

And why should it? I am sticking with the subject at hand: Best Porn Actress. However, you are not providing anything constructive to this thread; you are just being an annoying a'hole over some bs that happened awhile back. I don't think that this thread is the place for you to bring that up and I would ask that you cease and create a new thread for the subject that you are discussing with other members. I, on the other hand, am focusing on Porn Actress'.

Now, when it comes to talented brunettes, Jenna Haze really knows how to get the job done! She has one of those "girl from the office" looks and can really scream and talk dirty during sex. Though I am more partial to larger breasts, Jenna is not entirely flat...and leaves you with the impression of someone that is very healthy and perhaps did a lot of track and field when growing up. Yes, Jenna is a surefire winner and deserves to be ranked among the best!

[img]http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y189/keenedder/25k/jenna-haze-thong.jpg/img]

I'm responding to accusations made about me in this thread. Perhaps your issue should be with the people accusing me of violating the rules of this site, rather than the responses to these allegations. Let's be absolutely clear on this, Betiko is saying that I posted gay pornography that kids could openly view. That wasn't something that happened awhile back, it occurred in this thread a few posts ago.

If you are unhappy with this thread being used to throw out allegations that I'm posting pornography for children, perhaps you can take it up with the poster in question, rather than asking me not to respond to those allegations or calling me an asshole for saying that those allegations are false.

Are we done yet?

[Symmetry]

Probably