rMoney commits felony

[Woodruff]

Basically, it boils down to rMoney being the absolutely worst candidate ever.

Oh, heavens no. He wasn't even remotely the worst Republican candidate in the primaries. Not even close.

[Night Strike]

I think it's funny that Romney doesn't want to release his tax returns, because they will be used against him and make him look bad.

I have a feeling that he's probably committed tax fraud, and doesn't want an in-depth investigation into his finances. He probably joined in on the Amnesty program for individuals committing tax fraud with foreign accounts.

Basically, it boils down to rMoney being the absolutely worst candidate ever. He's so far out of touch the the common man, he's completely ignorant. He lives in his own little fantasy land, without a clue as to the plights of the common man. The only person worse was Santorum, because he wanted to turn America into the Iran of Christianity.

If you want more tax loopholes for the rich, if you want the financial sector to have less oversight and more stupidity, if you want mega-corporations to destroy America, if you want a representative that works for the 1%, vote for rMoney. If you want things more fair, more stable, less corrupt, and a representative that works for the 99%, don't vote for rMoney.

Why are you so desperately trying to pin a felony on Romney? Since the Bain/SEC trial balloon failed you're having to jump on the DNC bandwagon of claiming tax fraud?


Also, you're claiming Romney is out of touch with the common people. Do you think Obama IS in touch? Remember, this is the president who has promised not to raise taxes on people who make under $250k yet has passed massive tax increases in Obamacare, has lied about the mandate being a tax, and is now claiming that business owners didn't actually build their businesses. In fact, I think those actions have harmed a lot of people in the 99% you claim Obama to be for. Obama's idea of "fair" is socialism, not people making their own paths through life. And don't even get started on corruption in this administration with them repeatedly favoring unions (even if it means ignoring bankruptcy laws), ignoring laws based on their political preferences, and of course Fast and Furious. This administration has been a disaster for this country, and there's absolutely no indication that giving them 4 more years would have any chance of actually improving the country.

[GreecePwns]

Name 10 profound policy differences between Obama and Romney, with quotes proving those are indeed the two candidates' positions. Go!

[Night Strike]

I think it's funny that Romney doesn't want to release his tax returns, because they will be used against him and make him look bad.

Kind of like how no one in Congress will release their tax returns?

http://www.humanevents.com/2012/07/19/congressional-democrats-demand-romneys-tax-returns-but-keep-their-own-secret/

[comic boy]

Name 10 profound policy differences between Obama and Romney, with quotes proving those are indeed the two candidates' positions. Go!

The enlightened amongst us have oft stated that there is actually very little difference between the two candidates. Of course the dogmatic will see horns and cloven hoofs on anybody that runs on a Democrat ticket and will demonise them regardless of the truth , the irony is that these people are the ones who whine most loudly that the system is broken.

[Phatscotty]

Name 10 profound policy differences between Obama and Romney, with quotes proving those are indeed the two candidates' positions. Go!

The enlightened amongst us have oft stated that there is actually very little difference between the two candidates. Of course the dogmatic will see horns and cloven hoofs on anybody that runs on a Democrat ticket and will demonise them regardless of the truth , the irony is that these people are the ones who whine most loudly that the system is broken.

It's a little too late to pretend American's have not figured out Obama for who he is. He would have never been elected if he did not hide his agenda, like a coward. You can deny this, but just remember many Democrats have already agreed on this, and some have even celebrated Obama's secrecy, and even went so far as to cite it as part of his "brilliance" despite having no evidence whatsoever if he is brilliant or not....

As for who is whining all the time, this place is filled with name calling trash talking race baiting religion thrashing context dropping money grubbing liberty bashing character smearing self serving fomenting at the mouth bigoted "all about me" barbarians. This is beyond dispute

[Woodruff]

It's a little too late to pretend American's have not figured out Obama for who he is. He would have never been elected if he did not hide his agenda, like a coward.

He certainly did hide how much of a Republican he is, you're right.

As for who is whining all the time, this place is filled with name calling trash talking race baiting religion thrashing context dropping money grubbing liberty bashing character smearing self serving fomenting at the mouth bigoted "all about me" barbarians. This is beyond dispute

But we're tired of talking about you, Phatscotty.

[GreecePwns]

Name 10 profound policy differences between Obama and Romney, with quotes proving those are indeed the two candidates' positions. Go!

The enlightened amongst us have oft stated that there is actually very little difference between the two candidates. Of course the dogmatic will see horns and cloven hoofs on anybody that runs on a Democrat ticket and will demonise them regardless of the truth , the irony is that these people are the ones who whine most loudly that the system is broken.

It's a little too late to pretend American's have not figured out Obama for who he is. He would have never been elected if he did not hide his agenda, like a coward. You can deny this, but just remember many Democrats have already agreed on this, and some have even celebrated Obama's secrecy, and even went so far as to cite it as part of his "brilliance" despite having no evidence whatsoever if he is brilliant or not....

As for who is whining all the time, this place is filled with name calling trash talking race baiting religion thrashing context dropping money grubbing liberty bashing character smearing self serving fomenting at the mouth bigoted "all about me" barbarians. This is beyond dispute

Sooooooo no policy differences I take it.

[Juan_Bottom]

[Night Strike]

It's not that hard when it's just switching 2 neighboring letters. In fact, it's a lot similar to mistakenly typing "Osama" instead of "Obama".

[GreecePwns]

Except it's not, because there's no S in Obama, and it has absolutely no basis in anything except racism or religious hysteria.

[Night Strike]

Except it's not, because there's no S in Obama, and it has absolutely no basis in anything except racism or religious hysteria.

Or, it's really easy to accidentally type the wrong one, especially when we were discussing the killing of bin Laden.

[Woodruff]

Except it's not, because there's no S in Obama, and it has absolutely no basis in anything except racism or religious hysteria.

The S and B aren't exactly close on the keyboard, either.

[BigBallinStalin]

Except it's not, because there's no S in Obama, and it has absolutely no basis in anything except racism or religious hysteria.

Or, it's really easy to accidentally type the wrong one, especially when we were discussing the killing of bin Laden.

I dunno, maybe Osama was Obama all along, in the living room, with the crowbar.

[notyou2]

Name 10 profound policy differences between Obama and Romney, with quotes proving those are indeed the two candidates' positions. Go!

The enlightened amongst us have oft stated that there is actually very little difference between the two candidates. Of course the dogmatic will see horns and cloven hoofs on anybody that runs on a Democrat ticket and will demonise them regardless of the truth , the irony is that these people are the ones who whine most loudly that the system is broken.

It's a little too late to pretend American's have not figured out Obama for who he is. He would have never been elected if he did not hide his agenda, like a coward. You can deny this, but just remember many Democrats have already agreed on this, and some have even celebrated Obama's secrecy, and even went so far as to cite it as part of his "brilliance" despite having no evidence whatsoever if he is brilliant or not....

As for who is whining all the time, this place is filled with name calling trash talking race baiting religion thrashing context dropping money grubbing liberty bashing character smearing self serving fomenting at the mouth bigoted "all about me" barbarians. This is beyond dispute

Are you going to snap and start shooting the libs scotty?

[bedub1]

I think it's funny that Romney doesn't want to release his tax returns, because they will be used against him and make him look bad.

I have a feeling that he's probably committed tax fraud, and doesn't want an in-depth investigation into his finances. He probably joined in on the Amnesty program for individuals committing tax fraud with foreign accounts.

Basically, it boils down to rMoney being the absolutely worst candidate ever. He's so far out of touch the the common man, he's completely ignorant. He lives in his own little fantasy land, without a clue as to the plights of the common man. The only person worse was Santorum, because he wanted to turn America into the Iran of Christianity.

If you want more tax loopholes for the rich, if you want the financial sector to have less oversight and more stupidity, if you want mega-corporations to destroy America, if you want a representative that works for the 1%, vote for rMoney. If you want things more fair, more stable, less corrupt, and a representative that works for the 99%, don't vote for rMoney.

Why are you so desperately trying to pin a felony on Romney? Since the Bain/SEC trial balloon failed you're having to jump on the DNC bandwagon of claiming tax fraud?


Also, you're claiming Romney is out of touch with the common people. Do you think Obama IS in touch? Remember, this is the president who has promised not to raise taxes on people who make under $250k yet has passed massive tax increases in Obamacare, has lied about the mandate being a tax, and is now claiming that business owners didn't actually build their businesses. In fact, I think those actions have harmed a lot of people in the 99% you claim Obama to be for. Obama's idea of "fair" is socialism, not people making their own paths through life. And don't even get started on corruption in this administration with them repeatedly favoring unions (even if it means ignoring bankruptcy laws), ignoring laws based on their political preferences, and of course Fast and Furious. This administration has been a disaster for this country, and there's absolutely no indication that giving them 4 more years would have any chance of actually improving the country.

I'm not trying to "ping" a felony on Romney. I'm trying to expose the truth, which he is attempting to hide. I believe the reason he wants to hide the truth is because the truth won't set him free, it will hurt him.

[Juan_Bottom]

In other news, Pennsylvania admits it's rigging their presidential election for Romney:

http://video.msnbc.msn.com/politicsnati ... 4#47970104
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.c ... hp?ref=fpa

[GreecePwns]

What's wrong with anarchy?

[Phatscotty]

In other news, Pennsylvania admits it's rigging their presidential election for Romney:

http://video.msnbc.msn.com/politicsnati ... 4#47970104
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.c ... hp?ref=fpa

Interestingly, what this guy said can also mean that Romney will win Pennsylvania because it will be a clean election, and Obama and the shrinking number of voters he has won't be able to cheat.

Voter ID is a 70-80% issue. Only Progressives and Communists have a problem with it.

[AndyDufresne]

In other news, Pennsylvania admits it's rigging their presidential election for Romney:

http://video.msnbc.msn.com/politicsnati ... 4#47970104
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.c ... hp?ref=fpa

Interestingly, what this guy said can also mean that Romney will win Pennsylvania because it will be a clean election, and Obama and the shrinking number of voters he has won't be able to cheat.

Voter ID is a 70-80% issue. Only Progressives and Communists have a problem with it.

Voter IDs seem to only lead to more disenfranchisement in a democracy.


--Andy

[Night Strike]

In other news, Pennsylvania admits it's rigging their presidential election for Romney:

http://video.msnbc.msn.com/politicsnati ... 4#47970104
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.c ... hp?ref=fpa

Interestingly, what this guy said can also mean that Romney will win Pennsylvania because it will be a clean election, and Obama and the shrinking number of voters he has won't be able to cheat.

Voter ID is a 70-80% issue. Only Progressives and Communists have a problem with it.

Voter IDs seem to only lead to more disenfranchisement in a democracy.


--Andy

That doesn't mean that actual disenfranchisement takes place.

[GreecePwns]

Provide an example of such a measure taken that didn't disenfranchise voters.

[Night Strike]

Provide an example of such a measure taken that didn't disenfranchise voters.

There has been no case of a person being disenfranchised for not having an ID to vote. Those claims are only used to block it from happening, even though the vast majority of people who are going to vote already have IDs. If it's so disenfranchising of your rights, why do people have to show an ID to buy a gun? Why do people have to show an ID to petition the government? Those are also rights that people are perfectly fine with requirements to show ID to exercise.

[bedub1]

I'm torn on the idea of voter ID. When you see them voting for the first time in Iraq, they dye your fingers purple to show you already voted and can't vote again. No ID required, you just have to be a human. This makes complete and utter sense.

On the other hand, why would foreigners be allowed to vote in American elections? Shouldn't it be for American's only? So you should need a drivers license/State ID to show you are a legal resident/citizen.

[notyou2]

Provide an example of such a measure taken that didn't disenfranchise voters.

There has been no case of a person being disenfranchised for not having an ID to vote. Those claims are only used to block it from happening, even though the vast majority of people who are going to vote already have IDs. If it's so disenfranchising of your rights, why do people have to show an ID to buy a gun? Why do people have to show an ID to petition the government? Those are also rights that people are perfectly fine with requirements to show ID to exercise.

You didn't answer his question, you shifted to other areas where ID is required. Clearly a dodge.