Neoteny wrote:
one term.
remember, as the worst, most dumbest stupidity stupid dummy president ever, GW got re-elected.
Every year that goes by, I add another letter in the name "Obama" to my handwritten list of one term presidents.
Moderator: Community Team
Neoteny wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:one term.
remember, as the worst, most dumbest stupidity stupid dummy president ever, GW got re-elected.
Every year that goes by, I add another letter in the name "Obama" to my handwritten list of one term presidents.
Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:one term.
remember, as the worst, most dumbest stupidity stupid dummy president ever, GW got re-elected.
Every year that goes by, I add another letter in the name "Obama" to my handwritten list of one term presidents.
You Crimson Tide fans are all alike.
Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:one term.
remember, as the worst, most dumbest stupidity stupid dummy president ever, GW got re-elected.
Every year that goes by, I add another letter in the name "Obama" to my handwritten list of one term presidents.
You Crimson Tide fans are all alike.
And if you were a true vulcan you would have responded there are 5 letters in Obama and only 4 years in a term....
Spock Fail
The 5 letters to 4 year term ratio stands when U logicate 5 years worth of damage into 4 years.
Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:one term.
remember, as the worst, most dumbest stupidity stupid dummy president ever, GW got re-elected.
Every year that goes by, I add another letter in the name "Obama" to my handwritten list of one term presidents.
You Crimson Tide fans are all alike.
And if you were a true vulcan you would have responded there are 5 letters in Obama and only 4 years in a term....
Spock Fail
The 5 letters to 4 year term ratio stands when U logicate 5 years worth of damage into 4 years.
You don't have any idea what I was referring to, do you?
PLAYER57832 wrote:Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:one term.
remember, as the worst, most dumbest stupidity stupid dummy president ever, GW got re-elected.
Every year that goes by, I add another letter in the name "Obama" to my handwritten list of one term presidents.
You Crimson Tide fans are all alike.
And if you were a true vulcan you would have responded there are 5 letters in Obama and only 4 years in a term....
Spock Fail
The 5 letters to 4 year term ratio stands when U logicate 5 years worth of damage into 4 years.
You don't have any idea what I was referring to, do you?
I'd say more old M.
Woodruff wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Woodruff wrote:You Crimson Tide fans are all alike.
I'd say more old M.
Now I don't have any idea what you are referring to.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Woodruff wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Woodruff wrote:You Crimson Tide fans are all alike.
I'd say more old M.
Now I don't have any idea what you are referring to.
Sorry, Tide rivals. (intentional deflect).. at least it used to be so.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Woodruff wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Woodruff wrote:You Crimson Tide fans are all alike.
I'd say more old M.
Now I don't have any idea what you are referring to.
Sorry, Tide rivals. (intentional deflect).. at least it used to be so.
Is this some sort of Star Trek X-Men orchestrated hymns crossover?
BigBallinStalin wrote:thegreekdog wrote:
I don't think we can judge President Obama with respect to economics yet (except for a few things I've already identified - namely the cost-benefit of the job creation act and the wanton spending of money that we don't have). I think some parts of his job creation act were really effective. Other parts, not so much. I disagree with the bailouts, but a Republican president would have done the same thing, so I can't really have a beef with President Obama on that one. I'm kind of disappointed about his lack of action on gay rights and the Patriot Act, but he has time for that stuff. I'd give him a C+ if I were grading him (Bush gets a D, Clinton gets a B-, Bush I gets a B+, Reagan gets an A for point of reference).
TGD, why would you rate Bush with a B+?
His handling of the Panama canal situation was very... blunt, to say the least. That and the Persian Gulf War by not allowing more time for Saudi Arabia to negotiate some kind of arrangement, and basically the poor handling of that war (in the long-term sense of things).
Of course, I'm overlooking domestic issues and some other things, so I'd like for you to enlighten me.
MeDeFe wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Woodruff wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Woodruff wrote:You Crimson Tide fans are all alike.
I'd say more old M.
Now I don't have any idea what you are referring to.
Sorry, Tide rivals. (intentional deflect).. at least it used to be so.
Is this some sort of Star Trek X-Men orchestrated hymns crossover?
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Phatscotty wrote:A few more pieces to the Repeal scenario have fit into place. The way this is looking, Obama will not be able to stop it from getting repealed.
thegreekdog wrote:
I don't think we can judge President Obama with respect to economics yet (except for a few things I've already identified - namely the cost-benefit of the job creation act and the wanton spending of money that we don't have). I think some parts of his job creation act were really effective. Other parts, not so much. I disagree with the bailouts, but a Republican president would have done the same thing, so I can't really have a beef with President Obama on that one. I'm kind of disappointed about his lack of action on gay rights and the Patriot Act, but he has time for that stuff. I'd give him a C+ if I were grading him (Bush gets a D, Clinton gets a B-, Bush I gets a B+, Reagan gets an A for point of reference).
PLAYER57832 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:A few more pieces to the Repeal scenario have fit into place. The way this is looking, Obama will not be able to stop it from getting repealed.
Obama, no. The American people, though can and likely will.
Even the tea-partiers in many areas are having to agree that we need to be paying more, not less for certain things, like schools and health care. Folks are realizing that the REAL dupe was the Republicans who wanted nothing more than a big insurance industry wave.
thegreekdog wrote:
I don't think we can judge President Obama with respect to economics yet (except for a few things I've already identified - namely the cost-benefit of the job creation act and the wanton spending of money that we don't have).
Phatscotty wrote:thegreekdog wrote:
I don't think we can judge President Obama with respect to economics yet (except for a few things I've already identified - namely the cost-benefit of the job creation act and the wanton spending of money that we don't have).
I don't know. He told us what the problem with the economy was, and then said he had the answers. His answers were not correct. He can not now go back and say he did not understand the economy before. He should never have pretended that he could do anything about it in the first place..
Titanic wrote:Phatscotty wrote:thegreekdog wrote:
I don't think we can judge President Obama with respect to economics yet (except for a few things I've already identified - namely the cost-benefit of the job creation act and the wanton spending of money that we don't have).
I don't know. He told us what the problem with the economy was, and then said he had the answers. His answers were not correct. He can not now go back and say he did not understand the economy before. He should never have pretended that he could do anything about it in the first place..
Well the economy is on the up so maybe he did have the answers....
PLAYER57832 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:A few more pieces to the Repeal scenario have fit into place. The way this is looking, Obama will not be able to stop it from getting repealed.
Obama, no. The American people, though can and likely will.
Even the tea-partiers in many areas are having to agree that we need to be paying more, not less for certain things, like schools and health care. Folks are realizing that the REAL dupe was the Republicans who wanted nothing more than a big insurance industry wave.
Phatscotty wrote:thegreekdog wrote:
I don't think we can judge President Obama with respect to economics yet (except for a few things I've already identified - namely the cost-benefit of the job creation act and the wanton spending of money that we don't have).
I don't know. He told us what the problem with the economy was, and then said he had the answers. His answers were not correct. He can not now go back and say he did not understand the economy before. He should never have pretended that he could do anything about it in the first place..
Phatscotty wrote:Titanic wrote:Phatscotty wrote:thegreekdog wrote:
I don't think we can judge President Obama with respect to economics yet (except for a few things I've already identified - namely the cost-benefit of the job creation act and the wanton spending of money that we don't have).
I don't know. He told us what the problem with the economy was, and then said he had the answers. His answers were not correct. He can not now go back and say he did not understand the economy before. He should never have pretended that he could do anything about it in the first place..
Well the economy is on the up so maybe he did have the answers....
what aspects of the "economy is on the up" are you using?
Nobunaga wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Titanic wrote:Phatscotty wrote:thegreekdog wrote:
I don't think we can judge President Obama with respect to economics yet (except for a few things I've already identified - namely the cost-benefit of the job creation act and the wanton spending of money that we don't have).
I don't know. He told us what the problem with the economy was, and then said he had the answers. His answers were not correct. He can not now go back and say he did not understand the economy before. He should never have pretended that he could do anything about it in the first place..
Well the economy is on the up so maybe he did have the answers....
what aspects of the "economy is on the up" are you using?
... It's amazing. "The economy is up" says the Chicago thug, and the networks fall in line. Meanwhile, unemployment rises yet again and foreclosures set a new record.
... I suppose it all depends on one's understanding of the term, "up".
...
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
Users browsing this forum: No registered users