Moderator: Community Team
GabonX wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Missed this earlier. I want to clarify that absolutely believe the Bible and that it is the word of God, but this idea that Genesis means that the Earth was created in 6 revolutions of our earth (which did not even exist at the time, among other issues) is just not true.GabonX wrote:You can accept the Bible as evidence or not, it comes down to faith. Personally I think evolution is more likely but saying that there is no evidence is ridiculous. There is a written testimony, this is evidence.
That is one of the big issues I have with so-called "Creationists". They wish to paint this as a Christian= the earth is young versus atheist scientists =Evolution.
The truth is far, far more complex.
Why do you claim to believe in the Bible when you don't believe what is written?
This never made sense to me.
captain.crazy wrote:GabonX wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Missed this earlier. I want to clarify that absolutely believe the Bible and that it is the word of God, but this idea that Genesis means that the Earth was created in 6 revolutions of our earth (which did not even exist at the time, among other issues) is just not true.GabonX wrote:You can accept the Bible as evidence or not, it comes down to faith. Personally I think evolution is more likely but saying that there is no evidence is ridiculous. There is a written testimony, this is evidence.
That is one of the big issues I have with so-called "Creationists". They wish to paint this as a Christian= the earth is young versus atheist scientists =Evolution.
The truth is far, far more complex.
Why do you claim to believe in the Bible when you don't believe what is written?
This never made sense to me.
Folks like player only care about the humanitarian aspect of Christ. While that is important, it pales in comparison that we, as sovereign individuals, should want to help each other. It is much easier for people like Player to have forced morality by the government, than to run the risk of having people free to choose their own moral convictions. It also makes it easier for those that are poor to not give, when even Christ would be the first to tell you that though you may be poor, you can still share what you have with those that have even less than do you.
captain.crazy wrote:GabonX wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Missed this earlier. I want to clarify that absolutely believe the Bible and that it is the word of God, but this idea that Genesis means that the Earth was created in 6 revolutions of our earth (which did not even exist at the time, among other issues) is just not true.GabonX wrote:You can accept the Bible as evidence or not, it comes down to faith. Personally I think evolution is more likely but saying that there is no evidence is ridiculous. There is a written testimony, this is evidence.
That is one of the big issues I have with so-called "Creationists". They wish to paint this as a Christian= the earth is young versus atheist scientists =Evolution.
The truth is far, far more complex.
Why do you claim to believe in the Bible when you don't believe what is written?
This never made sense to me.
Folks like player only care about the humanitarian aspect of Christ. While that is important, it pales in comparison that we, as sovereign individuals, should want to help each other. It is much easier for people like Player to have forced morality by the government, than to run the risk of having people free to choose their own moral convictions. It also makes it easier for those that are poor to not give, when even Christ would be the first to tell you that though you may be poor, you can still share what you have with those that have even less than do you.
F1fth wrote:captain.crazy wrote:GabonX wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Missed this earlier. I want to clarify that absolutely believe the Bible and that it is the word of God, but this idea that Genesis means that the Earth was created in 6 revolutions of our earth (which did not even exist at the time, among other issues) is just not true.GabonX wrote:You can accept the Bible as evidence or not, it comes down to faith. Personally I think evolution is more likely but saying that there is no evidence is ridiculous. There is a written testimony, this is evidence.
That is one of the big issues I have with so-called "Creationists". They wish to paint this as a Christian= the earth is young versus atheist scientists =Evolution.
The truth is far, far more complex.
Why do you claim to believe in the Bible when you don't believe what is written?
This never made sense to me.
Folks like player only care about the humanitarian aspect of Christ. While that is important, it pales in comparison that we, as sovereign individuals, should want to help each other. It is much easier for people like Player to have forced morality by the government, than to run the risk of having people free to choose their own moral convictions. It also makes it easier for those that are poor to not give, when even Christ would be the first to tell you that though you may be poor, you can still share what you have with those that have even less than do you.
No! That would be communism!
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
TheProwler wrote:In any following (political or other), there will often be a group of unintelligent and uninformed followers who really don't understand the cause or issues, and are just there for the free pizza or maybe to get into some chick's skirt (or pants, for you liberals).
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:TheProwler wrote:In any following (political or other), there will often be a group of unintelligent and uninformed followers who really don't understand the cause or issues, and are just there for the free pizza or maybe to get into some chick's skirt (or pants, for you liberals).
Panties, I think most conservative as well as most liberal chicks wear panties.
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
TheProwler wrote:MeDeFe wrote:TheProwler wrote:In any following (political or other), there will often be a group of unintelligent and uninformed followers who really don't understand the cause or issues, and are just there for the free pizza or maybe to get into some chick's skirt (or pants, for you liberals).
Panties, I think most conservative as well as most liberal chicks wear panties.
Not the chicks I know.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:TheProwler wrote:MeDeFe wrote:TheProwler wrote:In any following (political or other), there will often be a group of unintelligent and uninformed followers who really don't understand the cause or issues, and are just there for the free pizza or maybe to get into some chick's skirt (or pants, for you liberals).
Panties, I think most conservative as well as most liberal chicks wear panties.
Not the chicks I know.
You're into hippies?
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
TheProwler wrote:MeDeFe wrote:TheProwler wrote:MeDeFe wrote:TheProwler wrote:In any following (political or other), there will often be a group of unintelligent and uninformed followers who really don't understand the cause or issues, and are just there for the free pizza or maybe to get into some chick's skirt (or pants, for you liberals).
Panties, I think most conservative as well as most liberal chicks wear panties.
Not the chicks I know.
You're into hippies?
Nope, models. Slutty models.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:Don't they usually wear panties (of whatever form) and little else?
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
TheProwler wrote:MeDeFe wrote:Don't they usually wear panties (of whatever form) and little else?
Not around here. Those slutty little fresh as a daisy models that I am so into every night. Maybe it's a regional thing...?
You could start a poll.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
TheProwler wrote:Oh, they're fresh all right...you just have to know what personal hygiene products to use.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
jonesthecurl wrote:...no, it's your inflated ego.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
pimpdave wrote:jonesthecurl wrote:...no, it's your inflated ego.
moi?
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
jonesthecurl wrote:...no, it's your inflated ego.
Return to Out, out, brief candle!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users