the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Moderator: Community Team
good nite all
by Dancing Mustard on Tue May 08, 2007 5:00 am
There are a number of things I could have chosen to write about in this letter. I could have chosen to write about how the continuing misunderstandings that some noisome devotees of conspiracy theories seem to have merely underscore this point. Or I might have chosen to write something about the way that thanks to Mr. Amandahugandkiss, our national and individual sovereignty is fluttering precariously in the wind. But, instead, I've decided to devote this entire letter to explaining how Amandahugandkiss gets his cause-and-effect relationships all mixed up. To address this in a pedantic manner, in the rest of this letter, factual information will be prefaced as such and my own opinions will be clearly stated as opinions. For instance, it is a fact that I have to wonder where Amandahugandkiss got the idea that it is my view that he has the linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious literature. This sits hard with me because it is simply not true and I've never written anything to imply that it is.
To simplify, I want to create and nurture a true spirit of community. I want to do this not because I need to tack another line onto my résumé, but because Amandahugandkiss is intellectually dishonest in everything he says and does. I always catch hell whenever I say something like that, so let me assure you that many people have witnessed him put our liberties at risk by a hateful and voluble rush to mete out harsh and arbitrary punishment against his adversaries until they're intimidated into a benumbed, neutralized, impotent, and non-functioning mass. Amandahugandkiss generally insists that his witnesses are mistaken and blames his condescending beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments) on disorderly schmucks. It's like he has no-fault insurance against personal responsibility. What's more, we cannot afford to waste our time, resources, and energy by dwelling upon inequities of the past. Instead, we must comment on Amandahugandkiss's tractates. Doing so would be significantly easier if more people were to understand that if the people generally are relying on false information sown by the most bad-tempered blusterers you'll ever see, then correcting that situation becomes a priority for the defense of our nation. I have always assumed that certain individuals in intelligence and law enforcement agencies may have overlooked some of Amandahugandkiss's more rapacious tracts, but the fact of the matter is that I maintain that Amandahugandkiss's operatives lie about their slurs, and then, when we're all convinced that no harm will be done, they render unspeakable and unthinkable whole categories of beliefs about power. My views, of course, are not the issue here. The issue is that this is a fundamental and obvious truth that he totally ignores. That's clear. But he claims to be fighting for equality. What Amandahugandkiss's really fighting for, however, is equality in degradation, by which I mean that Amandahugandkiss wants you to believe that he has mystical powers of divination and prophecy. You should be wary of such claims. Be aware! Be skeptical! Think! Do not be diverted, deceived, or mesmerized by Amandahugandkiss's unsympathetic, shambolic expositions.
If Amandahugandkiss could have one wish, he'd wish for the ability to worsen an already unstable situation. Then, people the world over would be too terrified to acknowledge that I am not embarrassed to admit that I have neither the training, the experience, the license, nor the clinical setting necessary to properly help you reflect and reexamine your views on Amandahugandkiss. Nevertheless, I do have the will to provide information and inspiration to as many people as possible. That's why I claim that the purpose of this letter is far greater than to prove to you how jackbooted and annoying Amandahugandkiss has become. The purpose of this letter is to get you to start thinking for yourself, to start thinking about how to Amandahugandkiss's mind, insensate buggers are inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. So that means that women are crazed Pavlovian sex-dogs who will salivate at any object even remotely phallic in shape, right? No, not right. The truth is that when I was a child, my clergyman told me, "Amandahugandkiss and others of his ilk are symbols of heartless sectarianism." If you think about it you'll see his point. Amandahugandkiss is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks. If we summon up the courage to take steps against the whole splenetic brotherhood of mean-spirited polemics (especially the wily type), then the sea of negativism, on which he so heavily relies, will begin to dry up. I have the following advice for Amandahugandkiss: If you can't manage to be grateful for all the things we've done for you, at least have a little dignity, don't whine, and don't expect to be treated like a fragile doll just because you have a theatrically hypersensitive soul and delusions of entitlement. Yet there's much more to it than that. To bring the matter closer to home, let me remind you that it is pointless to fret about the damage already caused by his brutish plaints. The past cannot be changed. We must cope with the present if we hope to affect our future and throw down the gauntlet and challenge his co-conspirators to make technical preparations for the achievement of freedom and human independence.
My dream is for tired eyes to open and see clearly, broken spirits to find new energy, and weary arms to find the strength to unmask Amandahugandkiss's true face and intentions in regard to defeatism. According to Amandahugandkiss's distortions, distractions, and outright deceptions, Amandahugandkiss has a "special" perspective on sexism which carries with it a "special" right to agitate for indoctrination programs in local schools. Fortunately, most of the people who are seriously interested in preserving our civilization know that the reality is that Amandahugandkiss has been deluding people into believing that his indiscretions won't be used for political retribution. Don't let him delude you, too. His uncontrollable accusations are a shout to the world that, when you least expect it, he will create some repressive, pseudo-psychological profile of me to discredit my opinions. I trust that I have not shocked any of you by writing that. However, I do realize that some of my readers may feel that much of what I have penned about Amandahugandkiss in this letter is heartless and in violation of our Christian duty to love everyone. If so, I can say only that the central paradox of Amandahugandkiss's expostulations, the twist that makes Amandahugandkiss's contrivances so irresistible to uncouth smart alecks, is that these people truly believe that people are pawns to be used and manipulated. Does he remember the hurt and hate in the eyes of the people he made fun of just so others would like him more? Even if he does, I'm sure he doesn't care, because many people are incredulous when I tell them that he intends to dismantle the family unit. "How could Amandahugandkiss be so egocentric?", they ask me. "It doesn't seem possible." Well, it is unmistakably possible, and now I'll explain exactly how Amandahugandkiss plans to do it. But first, you need to realize that I recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to examine the social and cultural conditions that do the entire country a grave disservice. The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why certain facts are clear. For instance, Amandahugandkiss occasionally writes letters accusing me and my friends of being nutty deadheads. These letters are typically couched in gutter language (which is doubtless the language in which Amandahugandkiss habitually thinks) and serve no purpose other than to convince me that if he wants to complain, he should have an argument. He shouldn't just throw out the word "uncontradictableness", for example, and expect us to be scared.
When we focus on what unites rather than divides us, we are not only threading our way through a maze of competing interests; we are weaving the very pattern of our social fabric. In essence, one of Amandahugandkiss's disciples keeps throwing "scientific" studies at me, claiming they prove that Amandahugandkiss is as innocent as a newborn lamb. The studies are full of "if"s, "possible"s, "maybe"s, and various exceptions and admissions of their limitations. This leaves the studies inconclusive at best and works of fiction at worst. The only thing these studies can possibly prove is that I want to see all of us working together to seek liberty, equality, and fraternity. Yes, this is an idealistic approach to actualizing our restorative goals. Nevertheless, you should realize that Amandahugandkiss's wisecracks make about as much sense as jumping off a building and hoping you'll sprout wings on the way down. As an interesting experiment, try to point this out to him. (You might want to don safety equipment first.) I think you'll find that if it weren't for complacent flakes, Amandahugandkiss would have no friends. If we intend to defend democracy, we had best learn to recognize its primary enemy and not be afraid to stand up and call him by name. That name is Mr. Amandahugandkiss.
To simplify, I want to create and nurture a true spirit of community. I want to do this not because I need to tack another line onto my résumé, but because Amandahugandkiss is intellectually dishonest in everything he says and does. I always catch hell whenever I say something like that, so let me assure you that many people have witnessed him put our liberties at risk by a hateful and voluble rush to mete out harsh and arbitrary punishment against his adversaries until they're intimidated into a benumbed, neutralized, impotent, and non-functioning mass. Amandahugandkiss generally insists that his witnesses are mistaken and blames his condescending beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments) on disorderly schmucks. It's like he has no-fault insurance against personal responsibility. What's more, we cannot afford to waste our time, resources, and energy by dwelling upon inequities of the past. Instead, we must comment on Amandahugandkiss's tractates. Doing so would be significantly easier if more people were to understand that if the people generally are relying on false information sown by the most bad-tempered blusterers you'll ever see, then correcting that situation becomes a priority for the defense of our nation. I have always assumed that certain individuals in intelligence and law enforcement agencies may have overlooked some of Amandahugandkiss's more rapacious tracts, but the fact of the matter is that I maintain that Amandahugandkiss's operatives lie about their slurs, and then, when we're all convinced that no harm will be done, they render unspeakable and unthinkable whole categories of beliefs about power. My views, of course, are not the issue here. The issue is that this is a fundamental and obvious truth that he totally ignores. That's clear. But he claims to be fighting for equality. What Amandahugandkiss's really fighting for, however, is equality in degradation, by which I mean that Amandahugandkiss wants you to believe that he has mystical powers of divination and prophecy. You should be wary of such claims. Be aware! Be skeptical! Think! Do not be diverted, deceived, or mesmerized by Amandahugandkiss's unsympathetic, shambolic expositions.
If Amandahugandkiss could have one wish, he'd wish for the ability to worsen an already unstable situation. Then, people the world over would be too terrified to acknowledge that I am not embarrassed to admit that I have neither the training, the experience, the license, nor the clinical setting necessary to properly help you reflect and reexamine your views on Amandahugandkiss. Nevertheless, I do have the will to provide information and inspiration to as many people as possible. That's why I claim that the purpose of this letter is far greater than to prove to you how jackbooted and annoying Amandahugandkiss has become. The purpose of this letter is to get you to start thinking for yourself, to start thinking about how to Amandahugandkiss's mind, insensate buggers are inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. So that means that women are crazed Pavlovian sex-dogs who will salivate at any object even remotely phallic in shape, right? No, not right. The truth is that when I was a child, my clergyman told me, "Amandahugandkiss and others of his ilk are symbols of heartless sectarianism." If you think about it you'll see his point. Amandahugandkiss is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks. If we summon up the courage to take steps against the whole splenetic brotherhood of mean-spirited polemics (especially the wily type), then the sea of negativism, on which he so heavily relies, will begin to dry up. I have the following advice for Amandahugandkiss: If you can't manage to be grateful for all the things we've done for you, at least have a little dignity, don't whine, and don't expect to be treated like a fragile doll just because you have a theatrically hypersensitive soul and delusions of entitlement. Yet there's much more to it than that. To bring the matter closer to home, let me remind you that it is pointless to fret about the damage already caused by his brutish plaints. The past cannot be changed. We must cope with the present if we hope to affect our future and throw down the gauntlet and challenge his co-conspirators to make technical preparations for the achievement of freedom and human independence.
My dream is for tired eyes to open and see clearly, broken spirits to find new energy, and weary arms to find the strength to unmask Amandahugandkiss's true face and intentions in regard to defeatism. According to Amandahugandkiss's distortions, distractions, and outright deceptions, Amandahugandkiss has a "special" perspective on sexism which carries with it a "special" right to agitate for indoctrination programs in local schools. Fortunately, most of the people who are seriously interested in preserving our civilization know that the reality is that Amandahugandkiss has been deluding people into believing that his indiscretions won't be used for political retribution. Don't let him delude you, too. His uncontrollable accusations are a shout to the world that, when you least expect it, he will create some repressive, pseudo-psychological profile of me to discredit my opinions. I trust that I have not shocked any of you by writing that. However, I do realize that some of my readers may feel that much of what I have penned about Amandahugandkiss in this letter is heartless and in violation of our Christian duty to love everyone. If so, I can say only that the central paradox of Amandahugandkiss's expostulations, the twist that makes Amandahugandkiss's contrivances so irresistible to uncouth smart alecks, is that these people truly believe that people are pawns to be used and manipulated. Does he remember the hurt and hate in the eyes of the people he made fun of just so others would like him more? Even if he does, I'm sure he doesn't care, because many people are incredulous when I tell them that he intends to dismantle the family unit. "How could Amandahugandkiss be so egocentric?", they ask me. "It doesn't seem possible." Well, it is unmistakably possible, and now I'll explain exactly how Amandahugandkiss plans to do it. But first, you need to realize that I recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to examine the social and cultural conditions that do the entire country a grave disservice. The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why certain facts are clear. For instance, Amandahugandkiss occasionally writes letters accusing me and my friends of being nutty deadheads. These letters are typically couched in gutter language (which is doubtless the language in which Amandahugandkiss habitually thinks) and serve no purpose other than to convince me that if he wants to complain, he should have an argument. He shouldn't just throw out the word "uncontradictableness", for example, and expect us to be scared.
When we focus on what unites rather than divides us, we are not only threading our way through a maze of competing interests; we are weaving the very pattern of our social fabric. In essence, one of Amandahugandkiss's disciples keeps throwing "scientific" studies at me, claiming they prove that Amandahugandkiss is as innocent as a newborn lamb. The studies are full of "if"s, "possible"s, "maybe"s, and various exceptions and admissions of their limitations. This leaves the studies inconclusive at best and works of fiction at worst. The only thing these studies can possibly prove is that I want to see all of us working together to seek liberty, equality, and fraternity. Yes, this is an idealistic approach to actualizing our restorative goals. Nevertheless, you should realize that Amandahugandkiss's wisecracks make about as much sense as jumping off a building and hoping you'll sprout wings on the way down. As an interesting experiment, try to point this out to him. (You might want to don safety equipment first.) I think you'll find that if it weren't for complacent flakes, Amandahugandkiss would have no friends. If we intend to defend democracy, we had best learn to recognize its primary enemy and not be afraid to stand up and call him by name. That name is Mr. Amandahugandkiss.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
-
Dancing Mustard
- Posts: 5442
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:31 pm
- Location: Pushing Buttons
by Neutrino on Tue May 08, 2007 5:08 am
Oh god. The person who started this crap is going to pay! 
We own all your helmets, we own all your shoes, we own all your generals. Touch us and you loooose...
The Rogue State!
The Rogue State!
-
Neutrino
- Posts: 2693
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 2:53 am
- Location: Combating the threat of dihydrogen monoxide.
by Neutrino on Tue May 08, 2007 5:17 am
No, I just saw it was going to continue on for a while and skipped to the end.
I didint even read the first one.
I didint even read the first one.
We own all your helmets, we own all your shoes, we own all your generals. Touch us and you loooose...
The Rogue State!
The Rogue State!
-
Neutrino
- Posts: 2693
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 2:53 am
- Location: Combating the threat of dihydrogen monoxide.
by alex_white101 on Tue May 08, 2007 5:19 am
i didnt, it was coleman wasnt it? i didnt even notice it had all been generated 
till someone told me.
till someone told me.''Many a true word is spoken in jest''
-
alex_white101
- Posts: 1992
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:05 am
by alex_white101 on Tue May 08, 2007 5:23 am
i noticed how long it was, and knew i cud never ever be arsed to read it, so just posted a comment bout him having too much time on his hands.
''Many a true word is spoken in jest''
-
alex_white101
- Posts: 1992
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:05 am
by strike wolf on Tue May 08, 2007 6:30 am
Skittles! wrote:strike wolf wrote:Skittles! wrote:Okay.
List as many countries as you can.
Then count how many you have so then I can see who the winner is.
Why bother? We all know that businesses are going to take over anyways.
There's always hope that another form of government will combat it, or at least, no government at all, just the people.
No. Don't you see that no government is what the businesses want? Without an organized body to stand in their way they are free to takeover the world via monopolies. Soon we would be paying $400 dollars for something we grow in our own back yard.
-
strike wolf
- Posts: 8345
- Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 11:03 pm
- Location: Sandy Springs, GA (just north of Atlanta)
by strike wolf on Tue May 08, 2007 6:34 am
We all noticed it, Skittles was just the only one bored enough to make a comment.Neutrino wrote:Skittles! wrote:Neutrino, as I am bored, and am not meant to be doing an assignment, I wish to point out your sig.
It says 'The Rogue State! Obey the fist!"
Or something along those lines.
Obey the fist? That's like leadership, correct? Like a leader, over the other people, kinda like a dictator.
How about... 'Join the fist'?
Seems more suitable.
Ha! I always wondered why no-one noticed that.
I always tend to do the opposite to what technically should be said or done (in a non-serious situation), so, in joining an anarchist clan, I put a dictatioral saying (that I stole from Invader Zim) in my Sig.
Also, sometimes when I play, I use my imaginary empire, the United Totalitarian States. Same basic idea (just not from Invader Zim, I made it up).
-
strike wolf
- Posts: 8345
- Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 11:03 pm
- Location: Sandy Springs, GA (just north of Atlanta)
by Neutrino on Tue May 08, 2007 6:36 am
strike wolf wrote:Skittles! wrote:strike wolf wrote:Skittles! wrote:Okay.
List as many countries as you can.
Then count how many you have so then I can see who the winner is.
Why bother? We all know that businesses are going to take over anyways.
There's always hope that another form of government will combat it, or at least, no government at all, just the people.
No. Don't you see that no government is what the businesses want? Without an organized body to stand in their way they are free to takeover the world via monopolies. Soon we would be paying $400 dollars for something we grow in our own back yard.
Id say if there was something powerful enough to topple world governments, I dont think big buisness will stand too much of a chance (since they legally do not have their own armed forces).
We own all your helmets, we own all your shoes, we own all your generals. Touch us and you loooose...
The Rogue State!
The Rogue State!
-
Neutrino
- Posts: 2693
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 2:53 am
- Location: Combating the threat of dihydrogen monoxide.
by strike wolf on Tue May 08, 2007 6:45 am
We can topple the governments if we are unhappy because there is no direct need that prevents us from doing it. But if we toppled big business, who would we get our farm products from? Go out and get a farm, I don't think so. Who would we get our pizza from? I'd blow up my own kitchen trying to make one. In other words, we're already too deep within the corporations strangle hold to ever get out without some kind of organized body.
-
strike wolf
- Posts: 8345
- Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 11:03 pm
- Location: Sandy Springs, GA (just north of Atlanta)
by johnnyrotten on Tue May 08, 2007 5:09 pm
cosmin wrote:Skittles! wrote:Move to a Communist country. That should do the trick.
should i suggest china
No, you should not. And you may not either.
-
johnnyrotten
- Posts: 2883
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 4:42 pm
- Location: Poole, England
by reverend_kyle on Tue May 08, 2007 5:42 pm
johnnyrotten wrote:cosmin wrote:Skittles! wrote:Move to a Communist country. That should do the trick.
should i suggest china
No, you should not. And you may not either.
You're right. I suggest Great Britain.
DANCING MUSTARD FOR POOP IN '08!
-
reverend_kyle
- Posts: 9250
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:08 pm
- Location: 1000 post club
by Serbia on Tue May 08, 2007 6:11 pm
Daring Overlord5 wrote:never posted in this thread just thought i would
and thanks for that.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
-
Serbia
- Posts: 12280
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
- Location: Detroit
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
|
|||||||
| Conquer Club is not associated with RISK online in any way. Copyright © 2006-2025 by Big Wham LLC | |||||||
