Moderator: Community Team
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
diddle wrote:and get rid of minister whateverhisnameis, he hasn't even proven himself to be a worthy knight yet, he needs to be a more accomplished member to try out for this coveted role
diddle wrote:0ojakeo0 wrote:ill run
get 145 more posts and we may just consider you
sorry minister i dont think you would win against such experienced spamiknightsunriggable wrote:diddle wrote:and get rid of minister whateverhisnameis, he hasn't even proven himself to be a worthy knight yet, he needs to be a more accomplished member to try out for this coveted role
Who agrees with this? I'll take him off the list unless there's overwhelming objection.
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
who is that?unriggable wrote:diddle wrote:0ojakeo0 wrote:ill run
get 145 more posts and we may just consider you
The lowest amount of posts by a candidate is 777.
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
duday53 wrote:who is that?unriggable wrote:diddle wrote:0ojakeo0 wrote:ill run
get 145 more posts and we may just consider you
The lowest amount of posts by a candidate is 777.
duday53 wrote:sorry minister i dont think you would win against such experienced spamiknightsunriggable wrote:diddle wrote:and get rid of minister whateverhisnameis, he hasn't even proven himself to be a worthy knight yet, he needs to be a more accomplished member to try out for this coveted role
Who agrees with this? I'll take him off the list unless there's overwhelming objection.
i replaced my 600 a long time agodiddle wrote:wow, that was hard, i've finally regained the 700 posts i lost in the spamalot tragedy
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
diddle wrote:wow, that was hard, i've finally regained the 700 posts i lost in the spamalot tragedy
unriggable wrote:diddle wrote:wow, that was hard, i've finally regained the 700 posts i lost in the spamalot tragedy
Nice...I'd have some 200 more posts if I wasn't banned for posting that link a while back.
I have an idea. Each knight that isn't running has three votes worth one point each. Hecter has three votes, worth five points each. Each person can only vote for each person once, so hecter can't vote three time for diddle for example.
Sound good? I think we should elect this way.
Minister Masket wrote:unriggable wrote:diddle wrote:wow, that was hard, i've finally regained the 700 posts i lost in the spamalot tragedy
Nice...I'd have some 200 more posts if I wasn't banned for posting that link a while back.
I have an idea. Each knight that isn't running has three votes worth one point each. Hecter has three votes, worth five points each. Each person can only vote for each person once, so hecter can't vote three time for diddle for example.
Sound good? I think we should elect this way.
I agree, because it's the only idea we have.
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
Users browsing this forum: No registered users