Non-VANILLA Game 3 *Game Over* 14 Winners

by **jnd94** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:36 pm

FOS-sheepofdumb

You've been acting defensive, almost too defensive. Ill be watching you...

by **Anarkistsdream** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:36 pm

Mandalorian, as always, I like your ideas... But I just don't know if I AGREE with them...

I'll have to wait and see and hear from more people... There are still people who haven't voted at all...

And Greeces very first comment about "his team" winning is very odd... Especially considering he has not really defended himself, and he is a noob to this game...

by **Syzygy** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:36 pm

mandalorian2298 wrote:
Aimless wrote:
mandalorian2298 wrote:
pancakemix wrote:Unofficial vote count:
AD-1(me)
Unit_2-1(Colaalone)
Sheep (mandalorian)

I unvoted, then voted again. I don't want to vote someone, because it's his first game, but I am eaqualy unvwilling to give someone a pass, just because it's his first game.

So, in other words, you're saying you do want to vote for someone because it's his first game, you're just going to regret it in the morning.

Ok, since it is Day 1, I guess it wouldn't be nice to kill him right off. unvote

However, it seems to me that everybody is a bit skeetish about just voting someone on random. So it is time for me to do what I do best: present a solid case against someone (using my ever-incrising paranoia, that is a direct result of playing thes games in the first place ).
vote Aimless

Now, all of you who played with Aimless know that he is a guy who likes to think things through instead of just lynching the first poor unfortunate who gives him a cause (don't ask me why, it puzzles me as well ). However, this is the first time that I ever saw him activly defending a single player. First it was: don't vote sheep, he is making mistakes because it's his first game. But, now you are trying to twist my words AND make me feel guilty. Well, I have a newsflash for you: NEVER TRY TO MAKE MANDALORIAN FEEL GUILTAY, BECAUSE WE HAVE NO CONCIENCE!!!!!

Seriously guys, if Aimless turns out to be scumm we have a strong sense against sheep and we are half-way to victory.

There is the possibility they could siblings or spouses?

Or he's scum, the only way to know is lynch though.

by **mandalorian2298** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:37 pm

Who's being agressive? :shock:

by **Anarkistsdream** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:38 pm

I think Unriggable is scum, folks... He is just way too defensive and pissy this game, and he is NEVER like that... Not in Risk, not in the forums... Never...

by **unriggable** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:39 pm

mandalorian2298 wrote:Who's being agressive?

No need to be aggressive when there isn't a deadline...

by **got tonkaed** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:39 pm

thanks for that quality addition there jnd....

I have to say that after seeing the brief portfolio of aimless's work...he is very good at what he does. Normally i wouldnt give too much merit to something like mandys line there, but truth be told considering aimless is probably one of the players i fear the most (saying a lot in a game like this) i think mando could have something more of a point. I suppose the question is...in a game with so many power roles, if there is a connection between teh two, it is a scum connection or a pro town type of connection?

by **unriggable** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:40 pm

Anarkistsdream wrote:I think Unriggable is scum, folks... He is just way too defensive and pissy this game, and he is NEVER like that... Not in Risk, not in the forums... Never...

Uh, you do know that I am pulling the exact same move that mandy is pulling...

And how many games have we played together? I think one...and I don't talk much except swearing when I get bad rolls.

by **Anarkistsdream** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:40 pm

Protown connections don't become so irate...

Unless they are me... :wink:

by **Syzygy** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:40 pm

I'm tending to agree on both Aimless and unriggable so far...

by **Anarkistsdream** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:41 pm

unriggable wrote:
Anarkistsdream wrote:I think Unriggable is scum, folks... He is just way too defensive and pissy this game, and he is NEVER like that... Not in Risk, not in the forums... Never...

Uh, you do know that I am pulling the exact same move that mandy is pulling...

And how many games have we played together? I think one...and I don't talk much except swearing when I get bad rolls.

That's why I don't agree with Mandalorian, either, though, bro...

by **unriggable** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:41 pm

As for being pissy I was just on this 'christian forum' a friend sent me (he's mega darwinist) and I saw just how bitchy people can get, so naturally, well, you know.

by **jnd94** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:41 pm

And Greeces very first comment about "his team" winning is very odd... Especiallyconsidering he has not really defended himself, and he is a noob to the game..

Good point, when he said that it was pretty odd and confusing. He might have just given us the answer to who he is...

by **unriggable** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:42 pm

jnd94 wrote:
And Greeces very first comment about "his team" winning is very odd... Especiallyconsidering he has not really defended himself, and he is a noob to the game..

Good point, when he said that it was pretty odd and confusing. He might have just given us the answer to who he is...

Maybe he's a serial killer!

by **mandalorian2298** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:43 pm

Anarkistsdream wrote:Mandalorian, as always, I like your ideas... But I just don't know if I AGREE with them...

I'll have to wait and see and hear from more people... There are still people who haven't voted at all...

And Greeces very first comment about "his team" winning is very odd... Especially considering he has not really defended himself, and he is a noob to this game...

Ok, I admit that the last few times I totally missed (and I was town, mind you), so I understand your reservations.
I just like to make my accusations as falshy as possible so that people notice them. And, at this point in the game, I prefer voting to FOSing (providing there's enough leads to justify it) because it shows more conviction (plus I'm an attention-whore :oops:

).

by **jnd94** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:44 pm

maybe, but arent sk's by themselfs? he said he was on a team.

by **unriggable** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:44 pm

mandalorian2298 wrote:
Anarkistsdream wrote:Mandalorian, as always, I like your ideas... But I just don't know if I AGREE with them...

I'll have to wait and see and hear from more people... There are still people who haven't voted at all...

And Greeces very first comment about "his team" winning is very odd... Especially considering he has not really defended himself, and he is a noob to this game...

Ok, I admit that the last few times I totally missed (and I was town, mind you), so I understand your reservations.
I just like to make my accusations as falshy as possible so that people notice them. And, at this point in the game, I prefer voting to FOSing (providing there's enough leads to justify it) because it shows more conviction (plus I'm an attention-whore ).

I dunno, what you're doing is pretty much 'VOTE because you're taking sides'

by **Syzygy** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:45 pm

jnd94 wrote:maybe, but arent sk's by themselfs? he said he was on a team.

"There is no I in team, but there is a me if you jumble the letters around a bit."

Maybe he's a 1-man team?

by **unriggable** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:46 pm

jnd94 wrote:maybe, but arent sk's by themselfs? he said he was on a team.

Oh yeah. Well, whatever. Maybe he's a survivor. It's just that people tend to lie a lot so maybe he just said that to avoid suspicion, I dunno in my mind it is a bulletproof.

by **jnd94** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:46 pm

maybe he doesnt understand the rules or something...i cant come up with any logical explanation

by **sheepofdumb** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:47 pm

We have enough people for a second mafia or cult right?

by **jnd94** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:47 pm

how long are days in this game?

by **mandalorian2298** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:48 pm

jnd94 wrote:maybe, but arent sk's by themselfs? he said he was on a team.

You see, unriggable, at least MY rantings are logigical rantings.

by **unriggable** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:48 pm

I still dont understand 'dead and alive'...

by **got tonkaed** on Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:48 pm

considering there are no vanilla roles its certainly possible, but usually if we get into to tied into a semantics discussion of the game early on...we potetnially tie ourselves into a difficult situation by believing theres only one way for the game to play out, disregarding the possiblity other roles variants are still out there..

my advice....just keep an open mind about the possiblity that theres numerous scum groups along with a variety of different talents on both sides.

Non-VANILLA Game 3 Game Over 14 Winners

Who is online