Chik-Fil-A 2.0 (D.C. Shooting)

[Symmetry]

obviously there's some ambiguity about what scotty meant

and i didn't see his edits

so i guess i'm going to believe that scotty doesn't think homosexuality is actually an infection because (presumably) he has a basic understanding of germ theory

my guess is that "infection" was referring, like i said earlier, to a militant liberal mindset

No, there isn't any ambiguity. Symmetry edited together 3 or 4 separate posts of mine to make fit his own 100% dishonest perception. I don't mind him being a complete jackass in public, ruining his own credibility. I take it as a compliment, all the way. People don't fall on the sword like that over what some particular "idiot" says abut some social issue. He does it because he must stop the idiot from speaking at all costs, no matter how low he needs to go.

in other words, trolling business as usual

Any editing of mine he refers occurred 30 minutes before he thinks I did it, and almost as long before he ever responded to the post in question, and the most ridiculous thing about his trolling is that his claims are time stamped to prove his dishonesty.

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=175768&start=180#p3845363

Last edited by Phatscotty on Sat Aug 04, 2012 4:44 pm, edited 2 times in total.

And my accusation:

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=175768&start=180#p3845373

by Symmetry on Sat Aug 04, 2012 4:35 pm

So you edited after I accused you, and not as your homophobic self is trying to claim, 30 minutes later.

You are simply lying, and I have the links to back me up.

[Phatscotty]

Dude, it was a spell check, but we have every reason to believe you, a person who edited 4 comments together, which makes it pretty easy to cherry pick the time stamp, does it not?

you are rotten to the core, and without a doubt a giant hypocrite

[Symmetry]

Dude, it was a spell check, but we have every reason to believe you, a person who edited 4 comments together, which makes it pretty easy to cherry pick the time stamp, does it not?

you are rotten to the core

Another lie?

Even comparing the two sources shows that you altered more than just spelling.

I quoted you as saying:

I think it provides tremendous insights into the literal sickness their heads are infected with. It truly is a mental disorder and a disease.

Your edited version now reads:

I think it provides tremendous insights into the literal sickness his head is infected with. It truly is a mental disorder and a disease.

If anything, your edit undermines your argument that you were talking about bigots in general. You're very clearly now targeting the man you think is gay.

[Phatscotty]

take your foeing like a man. I know you will continue to derail, but, whatev, I'm not smelling your garbage anymore.

[john9blue]

scotty, why don't you just unambiguously state your thoughts on homosexuality so that there's no confusion?

[Symmetry]

scotty, why don't you just unambiguously state your thoughts on homosexuality so that there's no confusion?

Do me a favour and see if you can get him to admit to lying about the editing stuff while you're at it. Bonne Chance!

[Phatscotty]

scotty, why don't you just unambiguously state your thoughts on homosexuality so that there's no confusion?

I have said many times, what makes peoples pecker hard or ginies tingle is none of my business. To each their own. I neither condemn or condone it, I accept that it is what it is, and I support that a person can love whoever they want, regardless of the sex. I realize I am nobody to tell another how to live their lives (if only I could ask to be respected similarly in turn).

[Symmetry]

scotty, why don't you just unambiguously state your thoughts on homosexuality so that there's no confusion?

I have said many times, what makes peoples pecker hard or ginies tingle is none of my business. To each their own. I neither condemn or condone it, I accept that it is what it is, and I support that a person can love whoever they want, regardless of the sex. I realize I am nobody to tell another how to live their lives (if only I could ask to be respected similarly in turn).

Lovely, might even save you from the ban hammer if peeps ignore the rest of the stuff you said and did in this thread.

I'd call you a little Hitler, but apparently you don't have the testosterone to man up and grow a pair of balls, let alone the 'tache required for the job.

As is, you will remain a cowardly homophobe, lurking wherever gay bashing might go unnoticed or excused for your opportunity, and ready with an excuse- "Not me, officer, I love gay people".

[Woodruff]

scotty, why don't you just unambiguously state your thoughts on homosexuality so that there's no confusion?

I have said many times, what makes peoples pecker hard or ginies tingle is none of my business.

Unless they want to get married, of course.

To each their own.

Unless they want to get married, of course.

I neither condemn or condone it

Unless they want to get married, of course.

I accept that it is what it is

Unless they want to get married, of course.

and I support that a person can love whoever they want, regardless of the sex.

Unless they want to get married, of course.

I realize I am nobody to tell another how to live their lives (if only I could ask to be respected similarly in turn).

Unless they want to get married, of course.

[Woodruff]

scotty, why don't you just unambiguously state your thoughts on homosexuality so that there's no confusion?

I have said many times, what makes peoples pecker hard or ginies tingle is none of my business. To each their own. I neither condemn or condone it, I accept that it is what it is, and I support that a person can love whoever they want, regardless of the sex. I realize I am nobody to tell another how to live their lives (if only I could ask to be respected similarly in turn).

Lovely, might even save you from the ban hammer if peeps ignore the rest of the stuff you said and did in this thread.

I'd call you a little Hitler, but apparently you don't have the testosterone to man up and grow a pair of balls, let alone the 'tache required for the job.

As is, you will remain a cowardly homophobe, lurking wherever gay bashing might go unnoticed or excused for your opportunity, and ready with an excuse- "Not me, officer, I love gay people".

If Phatscotty doesn't troll, then there's no way he's getting a ban-hammer for bigotry either.

[Phatscotty]

scotty, why don't you just unambiguously state your thoughts on homosexuality so that there's no confusion?

I have said many times, what makes peoples pecker hard or ginies tingle is none of my business.

Unless they want to get married, of course.

To each their own.

Unless they want to get married, of course.

I neither condemn or condone it

Unless they want to get married, of course.

I accept that it is what it is

Unless they want to get married, of course.

and I support that a person can love whoever they want, regardless of the sex.

Unless they want to get married, of course.

I realize I am nobody to tell another how to live their lives (if only I could ask to be respected similarly in turn).

Unless they want to get married, of course.

Do you have any opinion on if combining 4 separate posts to create a new post (above, in this post) is trolling? (Symmetry trolling that homosexuality = marriage aside)

[Woodruff]

scotty, why don't you just unambiguously state your thoughts on homosexuality so that there's no confusion?

I have said many times, what makes peoples pecker hard or ginies tingle is none of my business.

Unless they want to get married, of course.

To each their own.

Unless they want to get married, of course.

I neither condemn or condone it

Unless they want to get married, of course.

I accept that it is what it is

Unless they want to get married, of course.

and I support that a person can love whoever they want, regardless of the sex.

Unless they want to get married, of course.

I realize I am nobody to tell another how to live their lives (if only I could ask to be respected similarly in turn).

Unless they want to get married, of course.

Do you have any opinion on if combining 4 separate posts to create a new post (above, in this post) is trolling? (Symmetry trolling that homosexuality = marriage aside)

I am STUNNED! STUNNED! SHOCKED EVEN, that you didn't at all address the content of the post.

[Phatscotty]

But, the post is about Symmetry not addressing the context of the overall issue, which is the bigotry of the guy who got fired. Symm made it all about me, something I'm not so sure you could be impartial about.

Edit: Oops Woodruff, that post was a response to you, not Symmetry. I meant to ask you what you thought about combining 4 posts together to create a new post was trolling. Put your shock back in your sock, for now...

[Woodruff]

But, the post is about Symmetry not addressing the context of the overall issue

My post wasn't about Symmetry.

which is the bigotry of the guy who got fired.

My post wasn't about the bigotry of the guy who got fired.

Symm made it all about me, something I'm not so sure you could be impartial about

My post was about your hypocricy and lies, yes. And you're still avidly avoiding it.

[Phatscotty]

scotty, why don't you just unambiguously state your thoughts on homosexuality so that there's no confusion?

I have said many times, what makes peoples pecker hard or ginies tingle is none of my business. To each their own. I neither condemn or condone it, I accept that it is what it is, and I support that a person can love whoever they want, regardless of the sex. I realize I am nobody to tell another how to live their lives (if only I could ask to be respected similarly in turn).

Lovely, might even save you from the ban hammer if peeps ignore the rest of the stuff you said and did in this thread.

I'd call you a little Hitler, but apparently you don't have the testosterone to man up and grow a pair of balls, let alone the 'tache required for the job.

As is, you will remain a cowardly homophobe, lurking wherever gay bashing might go unnoticed or excused for your opportunity, and ready with an excuse- "Not me, officer, I love gay people".

If Phatscotty doesn't troll, then there's no way he's getting a ban-hammer for bigotry either.

Here, let me fix it. The previous 4 posts between Woodruff and I were mixed up. So, here, Woodruff came into the conversation and give his opinion about PS trolling or not etc. Now, I ask Woodruff, do you think Symmetry has been trolling?

[Woodruff]

scotty, why don't you just unambiguously state your thoughts on homosexuality so that there's no confusion?

I have said many times, what makes peoples pecker hard or ginies tingle is none of my business. To each their own. I neither condemn or condone it, I accept that it is what it is, and I support that a person can love whoever they want, regardless of the sex. I realize I am nobody to tell another how to live their lives (if only I could ask to be respected similarly in turn).

Lovely, might even save you from the ban hammer if peeps ignore the rest of the stuff you said and did in this thread.

I'd call you a little Hitler, but apparently you don't have the testosterone to man up and grow a pair of balls, let alone the 'tache required for the job.

As is, you will remain a cowardly homophobe, lurking wherever gay bashing might go unnoticed or excused for your opportunity, and ready with an excuse- "Not me, officer, I love gay people".

If Phatscotty doesn't troll, then there's no way he's getting a ban-hammer for bigotry either.

Here, let me fix it. The previous 4 posts between Woodruff and I were mixed up. So, here, Woodruff came into the conversation and give his opinion about PS trolling or not etc. Now, I ask Woodruff, do you think Symmetry has been trolling?

Is this your way of trying to distract away from the fact you're not addressing my post?

[Phatscotty]

translation: "please hire me, somebody, please"

people don't change so quickly. this guy is no exception.

I accept his apology. He should get a second chance, but I still think he should not be able to get a gun in the near future, and possibly be on suicide watch.

[Phatscotty]

Warning: too tolerant and diverse for TV

[john9blue]

translation: "please hire me, somebody, please"

people don't change so quickly. this guy is no exception.

I accept his apology. He should get a second chance, but I still think he should not be able to get a gun in the near future, and possibly be on suicide watch.

i'm not sure what you mean by "accept his apology". does that mean that you believe that he won't act the same way in future situations (which may not even be related to homosexuality or chick-fil-a)? does it mean that you think he has genuinely changed and now agrees with your viewpoints? does it mean that your opinion of him is now the same as the opinion of the average person?

[Woodruff]

i'm not sure what you mean by "accept his apology". does that mean that you believe that he won't act the same way in future situations (which may not even be related to homosexuality or chick-fil-a)? does it mean that you think he has genuinely changed and now agrees with your viewpoints? does it mean that your opinion of him is now the same as the opinion of the average person?

Yeah I'm with you on that one John, I can't imagine his actual viewpoint has changed any.

[Phatscotty]

translation: "please hire me, somebody, please"

people don't change so quickly. this guy is no exception.

I accept his apology. He should get a second chance, but I still think he should not be able to get a gun in the near future, and possibly be on suicide watch.

i'm not sure what you mean by "accept his apology". does that mean that you believe that he won't act the same way in future situations (which may not even be related to homosexuality or chick-fil-a)? does it mean that you think he has genuinely changed and now agrees with your viewpoints? does it mean that your opinion of him is now the same as the opinion of the average person?

I believe he recognizes he was wrong. As if his behavior will become erratic again, I would bet it will. I don't think he agrees or anything has changed. If you watch his entire apology he says his side needs to tone it down and not get swept up into extremism, and that they should spread their message in a different and better way, preferably not shoving it in everyones faces like this. I think he did the right thing, even though I am aware he is looking for a job and his motives for apologizing.

[BigBallinStalin]

@woodruff,

I see where you're going with this, and I'll take the time to respond later. My internet connection is frustratingly slow, so until then!


#woodruffloveswalmart

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=175768&view=unread#p3843805

I may have a thread around here somewhere on the subject...though it's been a long time.

It's been a long time. We shared sources, which we glanced at or didn't read, and unsurprisingly we still hold the same opinions as before.

[BigBallinStalin]

Gentlemen, we need to steer this conversation into more pressing matters:


Why is Israel confiscating the rightful homes of Palestinians?

Why are the US and Saudi Arabia funding terrorists in Syria?

What is the future of the use of social media as a means of protest?

What's the deal with airline food?

[yang guize]

maybe the terrorists promised to be real nice to the USA if they are given enough weapons to win. 'maybe'. LOL. why else would an uninvolved country choose sides in the civil war of a far away country?

[Woodruff]

maybe the terrorists promised to be real nice to the USA if they are given enough weapons to win. 'maybe'. LOL. why else would an uninvolved country choose sides in the civil war of a far away country?

For instance, the United States' Civil War...