Nobunaga wrote:... I thought this was rather interesting.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/scien ... 83861.html
My Chinese professor assured us all that "of course" human beings originated in China. I guess science is just now catching up.






Moderator: Community Team
Nobunaga wrote:... I thought this was rather interesting.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/scien ... 83861.html
jonesthecurl wrote:Well, I grew up in Basildon, in the (British) Essex, and I'm convinced that the human race must have originated there. I have two proofs:
(1) Many of my closest friends when I was growing up do not seem to have evolved as far as most of the race. Probably the more advanced specimens got out.
(2) If humans didn't originate there, it means that at some point someone must have deliberately moved there, and that is just too far-fetched.
jonesthecurl wrote:Well, I grew up in Basildon, in the (British) Essex, and I'm convinced that the human race must have originated there. I have two proofs:
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Coleman wrote:The argument between creationism and evolution is a religious one. While the bible does allow for both explanations to coincide, if you want to believe God is all powerful then you have to assume he could do anything. Such as placing scientific evidence within the rules he's created to make us believe things are billions of years old when they could have just been there for a few minutes.Titanic wrote:You cant say stuff like that, because its just not verifiable.
If God is all powerful then nothing is verifiable, he could change everything from one moment to the next without anyone knowing any different.
Now... If you want to argue from the standpoint that God is not all powerful then creationism suffers an instant loss and you can't have an argument to begin with.
LikeYestrdaysJam wrote:if you cant there is no debate, the intelligent ones win.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
LikeYestrdaysJam wrote:Coleman wrote:The argument between creationism and evolution is a religious one. While the bible does allow for both explanations to coincide, if you want to believe God is all powerful then you have to assume he could do anything. Such as placing scientific evidence within the rules he's created to make us believe things are billions of years old when they could have just been there for a few minutes.Titanic wrote:You cant say stuff like that, because its just not verifiable.
If God is all powerful then nothing is verifiable, he could change everything from one moment to the next without anyone knowing any different.
Now... If you want to argue from the standpoint that God is not all powerful then creationism suffers an instant loss and you can't have an argument to begin with.
Exactly you are exactly right. Now i thoroughly believe there is no God, there just isnt any facts or even theories that support him all there is is faith, Can you please give me one shred of eveidence or theory besides faith in his "all powerful nature" to support god and if you cant there is no debate, the intelligent ones win.
jonesthecurl wrote:How ould an agnostic know if he'd won?
tzor wrote:jonesthecurl wrote:How ould an agnostic know if he'd won?
How can anyone know if they have "won?"
And really, is science about winning?
At the very least when someone says "I don't know" they are generally guarenteed to be correct.
2:1 Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?
2:2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against YHWH, and against his anointed, saying,
2:3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.
2:4 He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: YHWH shall have them in derision.
jonesthecurl wrote:tzor wrote:jonesthecurl wrote:How ould an agnostic know if he'd won?
How can anyone know if they have "won?"
And really, is science about winning?
At the very least when someone says "I don't know" they are generally guarenteed to be correct.
Are you sure?
Lionz wrote:You lurk conquerclub forums more than most maybe. : )
Who has visited a 20th page of an evidence for Him thread? LYJ just joined a bit ago?
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:we need a subscription to view that article.
yes, i am indeed suggesting that you give us all subscriptions.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users