Moderator: Community Team
Why is that important and what would be the need?Backglass wrote:Why wouldn't a perfect god have foreseen this (knowing and seeing all) and prevented his word from being bastardized?
Where did this idea come from? Most of the guys in the book didn't have a book for that.Backglass wrote:This is the book that is going to save all mankind...isn't that kinda important?
The book says he'll do that, go wait on the porch.Backglass wrote: Doesn't he WANT everyone saved? Wouldn't he do everything in his infinite power to make sure that his message isn't altered and twisted? He IS capable of this isn't he?
Besides...if this were really a gods words, why the book? Why the errors? Why the translations and chances for mistakes? Why not just a giant face in the sky and speak to everyone at once. THAT is what a god would do. Not come to people in dreams and magical bushes.
2dimes wrote:It's just a book made up of a bunch of smaller ones. Some of it is histories passed down orally, like everywhere else untill some guy wrote things down.
2dimes wrote:Where did this idea come from? Most of the guys in the book didn't have a book for that.
2dimes wrote:The book says he'll do that, go wait on the porch.Backglass wrote:Why not just a giant face in the sky and speak to everyone at once. THAT is what a god would do. Not come to people in dreams and magical bushes.
Backglass wrote:jay_a2j wrote:The Book of Revelation was written so that Paul could disguise is message and because coming from his time he would not know how to describe what he was seeing... (What Paul describes as "giant locusts" could be attack helicopters but he used something familiar to him....he had never seen a helicopter before). Yes, I believe it is literal. That there will be a literal 7 year tribulation, a literal antichrist, a literal Armageddon and a literal return to Earth by Christ.
Wait a second...if it was all written as a "disguise", how can YOU pick and choose what is literal? Maybe "anti-christ" was code for "non-believer" and "armageddon" for a clash of neighboring cities?
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
AlgyTaylor wrote:Jay - do you believe every story that someone tells you?
What makes the Bible different from another story book? Nothing. Anyone can write in the front page "This is the word of Dog" or something, that doesn't mean that Dog actually wrote it -- just that the person who wrote the book first also wrote that it's Dog's work.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
Backglass wrote:Hmm...well it seems to me that a perfect, magical, all knowing, all-seeing god would write perfect text that could be instantly understandable and would not need any interpretation.
Why is this perfect god writing imperfect text?MR. Nate wrote: I don't claim to have a stranglehold on truth.
No...that would be jay
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
max is gr8 wrote:If there is a god. Why is there suffering we don't cause jay
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
jay_a2j wrote:"take the words of this book and seal it up, so that it can not be understood until the end days" (paraphrased) It is now starting to be understood...hence, we must be in the "end days".
If it makes you feel better about yourself to interpret it that way, go ahead. It is what it says it is. "they will gather together at the place called Megeto for the final battle of Armageddon". "The army of the East (China) will kill 1/3 of human population". "every man will be required to wear a mark on his right hand or forehead". "He will have the number of man 666". And so on.... literal, not symbolic.
jay_a2j wrote:If it makes you feel better about yourself to interpret it that way, go ahead.
I agree with you, why not read what it says instead of taking someone else's word for it? I think it should totally be a personal book.got tonkaed wrote:Nate, i think any nonbeliever should be allowed to try and interpret biblical teaching in a way that caters to them, after all if people dont believe in the God that authored the book any teaching out of the book that an individual is looking to acquire should meet the needs of the individual who is seeking some bit of helpful knowledge.
The whole thing with the eye thing is it's my human nature to point out how I'm better than you and try to help you be more like me, while I'm doing worse things than what ever I'm trying to "help" you avoid.got tonkaed wrote:Certainly there is more than one way to glorify God, but one wonders considering the teachings about not picking specs out of our brothers eyes while there is a spec in our own....why we believe all methods of edification, especially ones which condemn individuals are seen as equal in the sight of God as those which do not condemn but rather help to raise up others?
Antichrist isn't code in the book it kind of means non-believer like you say.Backglass wrote:Wait a second...if it was all written as a "disguise", how can YOU pick and choose what is literal? Maybe "anti-christ" was code for "non-believer" and "armageddon" for a clash of neighboring cities?
Um that's kind of strange. I wouldn't say I've ever been able to call myself a "Christian". I'm just not worthy.Xayath wrote:i just have to say this.
2dimes from what i have read u are the most respectable christian i have seen posting here.
all the others have had a smudge of bible bashing in them, u are actually cordial to the very person ur DEBATING with. Bravissimo well done
![]()
Xayath wrote:I am a Christian and make no apology for this, but i do not see how any god or religion can be proven by logic. Faith is a believe without proof or logic.
jay_a2j wrote:[Why is there suffering that we cause? God does not promise us a problem free, suffer-less life. He does promise eternal life for those who believe and "stand firm to the end".
vtmarik wrote:
But you said that it was disguised truth, so which is it? If the text of Revelation is a disguise, how can we even consider taking it literally.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
No need to be sorry don't appologise.Xayath wrote:sry imeant bible thumping.i equeat that with people using the bible as a blunt intrument against others
and sorry itseemed like u were on i am sorry
AlgyTaylor wrote:jay_a2j wrote:I believe that the Bible is the inspired Word of God.
Why?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users