Of These Candidates, Who is A Massive, Proven Racist?

[thegreekdog]

Ron Paul is in fact the least likely on the grounds that he has next to no chance of becoming President.
Latest odds ;
Obama : 4-6
Romney : 13-8
Gingrich: 14-1
Paul: 50-1

Why do you keep pointing that out? Do you have a problem with Ron Paul? Are you afraid he's going to cut ties to the UK and you're going to have to pay for your own defense (read: aggression)?

[pimpdave]

That's an interesting point. I wonder if there are more people who mean to vote for Ron Paul who haven't yet. I hope they do so soon!

[comic boy]

Ron Paul is in fact the least likely on the grounds that he has next to no chance of becoming President.
Latest odds ;
Obama : 4-6
Romney : 13-8
Gingrich: 14-1
Paul: 50-1

Why do you keep pointing that out? Do you have a problem with Ron Paul? Are you afraid he's going to cut ties to the UK and you're going to have to pay for your own defense (read: aggression)?

The truth is far more simple , just interjecting a little reality into the Ron Paul hyperbole of Phat Troll and his ilk. The story so far ;
Phat Troll '' Vote Ron Paul, hes our saviour and he is gonna triumph "
Me " Wow you can get great odds , how much you gonna bet "
Phat Troll .... No response
Me '' But you seem so certain , surely you have the courage of your convictions ? "
Phat Troll .... No response
Me '' So do we conclude that all your threads were trolling or is it the case that you know you have been peddling unrealistic bullshit ''
Phat Troll ..... No response .
Get the idea

For what its worth I never thought Ron Paul had a chance, clear to me for the last few months that it would be Obama v Romney . Dont actually think there is a great deal between the pair of them though I would vote for Obama in the hope that decisions could be made on a more bi partizan basis . If Romney wins you get 4 years more infighting and nothing achieved except reversals.

[ViperOverLord]

So you're into shrinkage pimpdave?

[john9blue]

The truth is far more simple , just interjecting a little reality into the Ron Paul hyperbole of Phat Troll and his ilk. The story so far ;
Phat Troll '' Vote Ron Paul, hes our saviour and he is gonna triumph "
Me " Wow you can get great odds , how much you gonna bet "
Phat Troll .... No response
Me '' But you seem so certain , surely you have the courage of your convictions ? "
Phat Troll .... No response
Me '' So do we conclude that all your threads were trolling or is it the case that you know you have been peddling unrealistic bullshit ''
Phat Troll ..... No response .
Get the idea

For what its worth I never thought Ron Paul had a chance, clear to me for the last few months that it would be Obama v Romney . Dont actually think there is a great deal between the pair of them though I would vote for Obama in the hope that decisions could be made on a more bi partizan basis . If Romney wins you get 4 years more infighting and nothing achieved except reversals.

voting is not betting; you don't get a prize if you voted for the winner

[pimpdave]

Since there was some confusion about the parameters of the poll. It's been changed, along with the question. This poll presumes anyone can be elected. Vote for whoever you think is the best choice please.

Everyone go ahead and re-vote, as the results have been reset.

[Phatscotty]

Who the F is voting for Obama in these polls? It's clear Obama is run by the military industrial complex and takes orders from Ben Bernanke.

only Ron Paul

[Aradhus]

Is RP a candidate? I didn't see his name on the wall in Jacobs cave.

I can't wait for Paul to start really fixing things. Look out Cancer, RP is on his way! Famine be gone, RP is on the prowl! Hypocrites and Jews, look out, the messiah has returned! RP's parting of the red sea is quite a spectacle.

[AAFitz]

long-term?

because a few of those guys would send our country on the path to getting destroyed/economic collapse/overtaken by china. meaning our military would suck and be quite small.

Do I sense a complex about shrinking and being small?

[AAFitz]

Ron Paul is in fact the least likely on the grounds that he has next to no chance of becoming President.
Latest odds ;
Obama : 4-6
Romney : 13-8
Gingrich: 14-1
Paul: 50-1

You always take the fun out of it with your god-damned reason.

[john9blue]

long-term?

because a few of those guys would send our country on the path to getting destroyed/economic collapse/overtaken by china. meaning our military would suck and be quite small.

Do I sense a complex about shrinking and being small?

Ron Paul is in fact the least likely on the grounds that he has next to no chance of becoming President.
Latest odds ;
Obama : 4-6
Romney : 13-8
Gingrich: 14-1
Paul: 50-1

You always take the fun out of it with your god-damned reason.

your posts sound reasonable and not at all retarded and baselessly biased.

if i posted comic's post and he posted my post, would you have responded in the same way?

no, you would not have.

[pimpdave]

Keep voting folks, I hope to have a definitive answer to this question soon!

[InkL0sed]

long-term?

because a few of those guys would send our country on the path to getting destroyed/economic collapse/overtaken by china. meaning our military would suck and be quite small.

Do I sense a complex about shrinking and being small?

Ron Paul is in fact the least likely on the grounds that he has next to no chance of becoming President.
Latest odds ;
Obama : 4-6
Romney : 13-8
Gingrich: 14-1
Paul: 50-1

You always take the fun out of it with your god-damned reason.

your posts sound reasonable and not at all retarded and baselessly biased.

if i posted comic's post and he posted my post, would you have responded in the same way?

no, you would not have.

Hmmph.

Fixed.

[john9blue]

Fixed.

facts are facts regardless of hmmphing

[Phatscotty]

The truth is far more simple , just interjecting a little reality into the Ron Paul hyperbole of Phat Troll and his ilk. The story so far ;
Phat Troll '' Vote Ron Paul, hes our saviour and he is gonna triumph "
Me " Wow you can get great odds , how much you gonna bet "
Phat Troll .... No response
Me '' But you seem so certain , surely you have the courage of your convictions ? "
Phat Troll .... No response
Me '' So do we conclude that all your threads were trolling or is it the case that you know you have been peddling unrealistic bullshit ''
Phat Troll ..... No response .
Get the idea

For what its worth I never thought Ron Paul had a chance, clear to me for the last few months that it would be Obama v Romney . Dont actually think there is a great deal between the pair of them though I would vote for Obama in the hope that decisions could be made on a more bi partizan basis . If Romney wins you get 4 years more infighting and nothing achieved except reversals.

voting is not betting; you don't get a prize if you voted for the winner

Yeah, guy thinks this is a horse-race?

Comic. There are 2 choices. A candidate who is just like all the other candidates and will cave immediately under the pressure when they get to Washington, or else Ron Paul.

Ron Paul represents me 100 times more than any other candidate ever could...what's your'e problem with that? Why would I vote or promote anyone else? ya stick

[pimpdave]

I also think a large percentage of Republicans should vote for Ron Paul.

[Phatscotty]

Ron Paul is in fact the least likely on the grounds that he has next to no chance of becoming President.
Latest odds ;
Obama : 4-6
Romney : 13-8
Gingrich: 14-1
Paul: 50-1

You always take the fun out of it with your god-damned reason.

Reason? This is a presidential election.

We have the choice of:
#1 voting for who represents us best,
#2 or trying to "play the odds " or pick the winner....to brag to your friends you voted for the winner or something I don't know.

What I do know is one of those choices take courage and conviction, the other choice is for people who like having their candidates picked for them by the media and the central establishment.

[thegreekdog]

Ron Paul is in fact the least likely on the grounds that he has next to no chance of becoming President.
Latest odds ;
Obama : 4-6
Romney : 13-8
Gingrich: 14-1
Paul: 50-1

Why do you keep pointing that out? Do you have a problem with Ron Paul? Are you afraid he's going to cut ties to the UK and you're going to have to pay for your own defense (read: aggression)?

The truth is far more simple , just interjecting a little reality into the Ron Paul hyperbole of Phat Troll and his ilk. The story so far ;
Phat Troll '' Vote Ron Paul, hes our saviour and he is gonna triumph "
Me " Wow you can get great odds , how much you gonna bet "
Phat Troll .... No response
Me '' But you seem so certain , surely you have the courage of your convictions ? "
Phat Troll .... No response
Me '' So do we conclude that all your threads were trolling or is it the case that you know you have been peddling unrealistic bullshit ''
Phat Troll ..... No response .
Get the idea

For what its worth I never thought Ron Paul had a chance, clear to me for the last few months that it would be Obama v Romney . Dont actually think there is a great deal between the pair of them though I would vote for Obama in the hope that decisions could be made on a more bi partizan basis . If Romney wins you get 4 years more infighting and nothing achieved except reversals.

I'm clear now. I agree on everything except your apparent thought that Obama works in a bipartisan manner. I thought that too, especially with his great healthcare debate thing that was televised and all (I watched it). The president and Congressional Democrats ignored all the Republicans' plans and points. The president does a good job, however, of pretending he's bipartisan. And he's a Democrat in name only at this point, what with his economic plans and war mongering.

[comic boy]

Greek
I dont suggest that Obama is more inclined to be bi partizan, simply that a continued spell in office offers greater opportunity of that happening .

Phat Troll
Horse race or donkey race , it makes no difference , the point is do you have the courage of your convictions. If I were as convinced as you appear to be that Ron Paul is a winner then I would have put my money where my mouth was ( especially given such tasty odds ) .

[thegreekdog]

I dont suggest that Obama is more inclined to be bi partizan, simply that a continued spell in office offers greater opportunity of that happening .

I have to think about that. I'm trying to remember the Clinton and Bush II administrations and whether there was more bipartisanship.

[comic boy]

I dont suggest that Obama is more inclined to be bi partizan, simply that a continued spell in office offers greater opportunity of that happening .

I have to think about that. I'm trying to remember the Clinton and Bush II administrations and whether there was more bipartisanship.

Its worth taking a look at the present UK coalition government which is working far better than most people imagined it would . The Liberal minority is achieving far more by working with the Conservatives than it ever did by screaming at them whilst in opposition.

[thegreekdog]

I dont suggest that Obama is more inclined to be bi partizan, simply that a continued spell in office offers greater opportunity of that happening .

I have to think about that. I'm trying to remember the Clinton and Bush II administrations and whether there was more bipartisanship.

Its worth taking a look at the present UK coalition government which is working far better than most people imagined it would . The Liberal minority is achieving far more by working with the Conservatives than it ever did by screaming at them whilst in opposition.

I believe the Clinton administration was highly effective (working with a Republican Congress). I do not think the Bush administration was effective working with a Democrat Congress. I suspect other factors are at play than second terms.

I believe we'll get to see this play out because I do not think any of the Republican candidates can beat the president in the general election.

[pimpdave]

I just don't understand why so many of the Conquer Club community participators, or CCCP, are supporting such a massive, proven racist.

[thegreekdog]

I just don't understand why so many of the Conquer Club community participators, or CCCP, are supporting such a massive, proven racist.

CCCP? Nice.

By the way - I did figure out the trap. Right after you changed the option to "the federal reserve" I figured out what you were going to do. Nice work.

[pimpdave]

I think there must be some misunderstanding on your part, thegreekdog.

I'm glad we've conducted this poll though. This thread will be useful to cite in future arguments about whether or not Ron Paul is a massive, proven racist.