Conquer Club

Religion, Get Out of Politics Or Be Taxed

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Religion, Get Out of Politics Or Be Taxed

Postby daddy1gringo on Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:02 pm

Symmetry wrote:
daddy1gringo wrote:OK, so while we're at it, what activities which now occur, which you consider religion being IN politics, would you forbid? Specifically.

So how about my question?


I'd say that you've taken a general question, and entirely localised it to the US. I'd like to see the Queen removed as head of the Church of England, and religious officials taken out of the House of Lords.

Now that's an interesting response. Seems to me the truth is exactly the opposite. There's nothing in my question that localizes it to the U.S., unless you're talking about the "swearing on the Bible" thing, but that's just something that BBS brought up and I was answering.

On the other hand, the whole concept of "separation of church and state" is pretty much a U.S. creation. It can't be one of the foundational principles of British governance considering, as we both mentioned, the reigning monarch is the head of the church. I agree with you that that ought not to be. The leader of a church should be such by virtue of, well, virtue, that is to say, godliness, or at least, wisdom. Still, that seems to me less of religion being "in" government than government being "in" religion, and as I mentioned, was the reason for the "establishment clause" in the U.S. Constitution.

Now the other part that you mentioned, "religious officials [in] the House of Lords" is interesting. Are you saying that people with certain church offices, say, archbishop, are automatically given a seat by virtue of that office, or that there are simply some members who also happen to be religious officials?
The right answer to the wrong question is still the wrong answer to the real question.
User avatar
Lieutenant daddy1gringo
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:47 am
Location: Connecticut yankee expatriated in Houston, Texas area, by way of Isabela, NW PR

Re: Religion, Get Out of Politics Or Be Taxed

Postby Symmetry on Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:12 pm

[quote=]
Symmetry wrote:
daddy1gringo wrote:OK, so while we're at it, what activities which now occur, which you consider religion being IN politics, would you forbid? Specifically.

So how about my question?


I'd say that you've taken a general question, and entirely localised it to the US. I'd like to see the Queen removed as head of the Church of England, and religious officials taken out of the House of Lords.

Now that's an interesting response. Seems to me the truth is exactly the opposite. There's nothing in my question that localizes it to the U.S., unless you're talking about the "swearing on the Bible" thing, but that's just something that BBS brought up and I was answering.

On the other hand, the whole concept of "separation of church and state" is pretty much a U.S. creation. It can't be one of the foundational principles of British governance considering, as we both mentioned, the reigning monarch is the head of the church. I agree with you that that ought not to be. The leader of a church should be such by virtue of, well, virtue, that is to say, godliness, or at least, wisdom. Still, that seems to me less of religion being "in" government than government being "in" religion, and as I mentioned, was the reason for the "establishment clause" in the U.S. Constitution.

Now the other part that you mentioned, "religious officials [in] the House of Lords" is interesting. Are you saying that people with certain church offices, say, archbishop, are automatically given a seat by virtue of that office, or that there are simply some members who also happen to be religious officials?[/quote]

daddy1gringo wrote:As Phatscotty pointed out, the "establishment clause" was meant to keep government from affecting faith, not to keep faith from affecting government. It was to avoid having an established church such as England had: the "Church of England", or Anglican Church, whose official head was the King, which gave them power to use the civil authorities to persecute people whose beliefs were different, like Baptists, Quakers, Presbyterians, Puritans, Catholics, etc.


Was kind of the bit I referred to- it's the first part of your first post in response to the question, and the first that is America-centric.

I'm not sure I'm with you on the history front, Oliver Cromwell was not head of the Church of England, but was head of state, and is generally considered Puritan and Republican- though there are differing views.

Yes, the UK has members of parliament, specifically in the House of Lords, who hold office unelected by virtue of office within the church.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lords_Spiritual
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Previous

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

cron