Conquer Club

What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Do you think that non-believers should be tortured forever?

 
Total votes : 0

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby Night Strike on Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:43 pm

pmchugh wrote:
Ray Rider wrote:Let me get this straight, pmchugh; you start out with a skewed poll, claim those who disagree with you are brainwashed, and then expect intelligent people to take the time to have a reasonable discussion with you??


I am sorry if my poll seems skewed. I admit that the results may not be accurate if Atheists answer but the question itself I do not see as skewed?

Perhaps the brainwashed comment is not a nice thing to say even if it is what I believe to be true. I will edit it out as it I guess it is "offensive" but I think you should have a bit of a thicker skin.. especially on the internet.


I haven't voted in the poll because it's not a fair question. "Torture" implies that the victim is there against his will. I disagree with that assumption when it comes to Hell because people are only there because they did not accept Christ's sacrifice and God's forgiveness. Also, it's not like God just decides who will go there or not go there: it is predicated on our decision.

pmchugh wrote:OK that explains some things, at least the "eternal soul" part. But I still don't understand what would cause this "pain". Right now we are sinful and therefore separate from God, yet I do not feel this pain or at least I am unaware that I am feeling it. If your version of Hell is no worse than Earth then I shall accept it as morally just.


Earth is not as bad as Hell because God still mitigates in our affairs. In Hell, He will leave us to our own sinful desires, so part of the punishment of Hell will be because of the innate depravity of our naturally sinful desires. Hell will be much worse than Earth because God will completely have turned his back on those in Hell.
Image
User avatar
Major Night Strike
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:52 pm

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby pmchugh on Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:34 pm

Night Strike wrote:
pmchugh wrote:
Ray Rider wrote:Let me get this straight, pmchugh; you start out with a skewed poll, claim those who disagree with you are brainwashed, and then expect intelligent people to take the time to have a reasonable discussion with you??


I am sorry if my poll seems skewed. I admit that the results may not be accurate if Atheists answer but the question itself I do not see as skewed?

Perhaps the brainwashed comment is not a nice thing to say even if it is what I believe to be true. I will edit it out as it I guess it is "offensive" but I think you should have a bit of a thicker skin.. especially on the internet.


I haven't voted in the poll because it's not a fair question. "Torture" implies that the victim is there against his will. I disagree with that assumption when it comes to Hell because people are only there because they did not accept Christ's sacrifice and God's forgiveness. Also, it's not like God just decides who will go there or not go there: it is predicated on our decision.

pmchugh wrote:OK that explains some things, at least the "eternal soul" part. But I still don't understand what would cause this "pain". Right now we are sinful and therefore separate from God, yet I do not feel this pain or at least I am unaware that I am feeling it. If your version of Hell is no worse than Earth then I shall accept it as morally just.


Earth is not as bad as Hell because God still mitigates in our affairs. In Hell, He will leave us to our own sinful desires, so part of the punishment of Hell will be because of the innate depravity of our naturally sinful desires. Hell will be much worse than Earth because God will completely have turned his back on those in Hell.


I thought we were coming along to a nice agreeable conclusion but apparently not. I would argue that your answer to the question is "no" but that the person that inflicts this eternal torture is the non-believer them self.

Of course I still argue that God decides that we should be punished (or rather the absolutely morally correct punishment for any sin is eternal pain). If Hell is worse than Earth and God can withstand us being on Earth then I see no need for Hell other than to punish sin. In fact the Bible itself refers to "eternal punishment" in Matthew 25:46. (interestingly one translation calls it "eternal torture" but I am sure that is a false translation ;)

So that brings us back to square one. It appears that your belief is that the absolutely morally correct punishment for sin is eternal pain. The only justification provided has been "it is your choice" but as I stated in my original post, people don't choose how they are punished.

To summarise: Even if we choose not to be with God, we do not choose to have the eternal pain of an unbearable nature that comes as a result. One does not necessitate the other. Sinners on Earth are a perfect example of how one may reject God and still not feel that pain.
2009-08-12 03:35:31 - Squirrels Hat: MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!
2009-08-12 03:44:25 - Mr. Squirrel: Do you think my hat will attack me?
User avatar
Colonel pmchugh
 
Posts: 1264
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 7:40 pm

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby Night Strike on Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:37 pm

pmchugh wrote:I thought we were coming along to a nice agreeable conclusion but apparently not. I would argue that your answer to the question is "no" but that the person that inflicts this eternal torture is the non-believer them self.

Of course I still argue that God decides that we should be punished (or rather the absolutely morally correct punishment for any sin is eternal pain). If Hell is worse than Earth and God can withstand us being on Earth then I see no need for Hell other than to punish sin. In fact the Bible itself refers to "eternal punishment" in Matthew 25:46. (interestingly one translation calls it "eternal torture" but I am sure that is a false translation ;)

So that brings us back to square one. It appears that your belief is that the absolutely morally correct punishment for sin is eternal pain. The only justification provided has been "it is your choice" but as I stated in my original post, people don't choose how they are punished.

To summarise: Even if we choose not to be with God, we do not choose to have the eternal pain of an unbearable nature that comes as a result. One does not necessitate the other. Sinners on Earth are a perfect example of how one may reject God and still not feel that pain.


Just because a person rejects God on earth doesn't mean that God leaves. On earth, the person still has the ability to repent and accept God, so God stays involved to try to convince the person to accept him. When a person dies, they no longer have the ability to accept God's forgiveness, so God sends the person out of his presence, which is what we refer to as Hell.

I never made the choice as to what punishment is "absolutely morally correct" when it comes to rejecting God; I'm just conveying the reality of what the punishment is. Just because a person doesn't choose how they are punished doesn't negate the fact that they chose punishment over God's forgiveness. In fact, God makes it clear in the Bible what the punishment is: eternal separation from God. And it makes sense that a sinful being who has chosen sin over forgiveness will be forced to spend eternity completely separate from a perfect being.
Image
User avatar
Major Night Strike
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:52 pm

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby pmchugh on Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:57 pm

I''m tired of circling. A person may choose to commit a crime but that does not mean the punishment necessarily fits the crime. I still don't get why God can't give people an infinite amount of chances, make Earth last forever and hey presto no eternal pain for sinners. He is all-powerfull after all.

Also it is not clear what the punishment is at all in the Bible. Is the fire literal or metaphorical? Is Hell itself metaphorical as zimmah suggests? Is it a physical place in this universe? (some people actually believe its the centre of the Earth).

I think we will swim in infinite regress so I am not going to phrase this as a question. I do not believe the punishment reflects the crime, apparently you do.

On an unrelated note, quite separate from religion, is eternal pain worse that eternal happiness? I can't fathom eternity.. what would the difference be when you have no ups or downs. If you don't have evil/sadness how can you have good/happiness.
2009-08-12 03:35:31 - Squirrels Hat: MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!
2009-08-12 03:44:25 - Mr. Squirrel: Do you think my hat will attack me?
User avatar
Colonel pmchugh
 
Posts: 1264
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 7:40 pm

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby Night Strike on Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:08 pm

Then let me rephrase the situation for you. "Sin" is defined as disobeying God, going against his commands, etc. The punishment for that sin is to be separated from God for eternity. Isn't that just? If you sin against a perfect being, why should you be allowed to continue to stay in their presence? But even though we have sinned against God, he provided a way to atone for our sins and extend us forgiveness so that we may be cleansed in order to return to his presence. Why should we get an infinite amount of chances to receive that? If we did, there would be no consequences of sin.
Image
User avatar
Major Night Strike
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:52 pm

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby pmchugh on Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:54 pm

Night Strike wrote:Then let me rephrase the situation for you. "Sin" is defined as disobeying God, going against his commands, etc. The punishment for that sin is to be separated from God for eternity. Isn't that just? If you sin against a perfect being, why should you be allowed to continue to stay in their presence? But even though we have sinned against God, he provided a way to atone for our sins and extend us forgiveness so that we may be cleansed in order to return to his presence. Why should we get an infinite amount of chances to receive that? If we did, there would be no consequences of sin.


You say the punishment is "separation from God", this is not the punishment, the punishment is what this causes i.e. pain. God controls everything, he created us, he created free will which in turn spawned sin. To borrow a phrase from Fulke Greville (via hitch), we are "Created sick- Commanded to be well". How is any of this just? You define sin as "disobeying" God, well I see nothing wrong with this UNLESS God happens to command you to do whatever is absolutely morally correct. So how are absolute morals defined... oh yes by God the eternal dictator himself. He creates the game, the rules and the players and then treats his subjects horrifically. Our time on earth is all about suffering and our only salvation is to believe in a pretty repulsive book written thousands of years ago and responsible for millions of deaths. If we fail in this monumental task of shutting our eyes, burrying our heads in the sand, not asking any questions, avoiding all the wrong religions and sects of religions, following a rough translation of a selection of his rules whenever we can and repenting when we cannot then we are punished with eternal pain. Well that is fair.

/rant
2009-08-12 03:35:31 - Squirrels Hat: MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!
2009-08-12 03:44:25 - Mr. Squirrel: Do you think my hat will attack me?
User avatar
Colonel pmchugh
 
Posts: 1264
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 7:40 pm

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby Maugena on Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:29 am

This blather about God and such is giving me a raging hard-on.
Renewed yet infused with apathy.
Let's just have a good time, all right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjQii_BboIk
User avatar
New Recruit Maugena
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 7:07 pm

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby TA1LGUNN3R on Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:40 am

Lootifer wrote:According to NS hell is a world free of gods regulation; sounds good to me!


I know, right? It sounds like hell is somebody's separation anxiety and lack of self-esteem. What a bunch of pansies. I would be thrilled just to survive death.

Tell you what, Loot. In hell I'll buy you a round.

This reminds me of this Heinlein book I read a while back, Job: A Comedy of Justice. The main character goes to hell and it was pretty awesome, and Lucifer was a pretty chill dude, too.

-TG
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class TA1LGUNN3R
 
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:52 am
Location: 22 Acacia Avenue

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby Haggis_McMutton on Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:52 am

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:
Lootifer wrote:According to NS hell is a world free of gods regulation; sounds good to me!


I know, right? It sounds like hell is somebody's separation anxiety and lack of self-esteem. What a bunch of pansies. I would be thrilled just to survive death.

Tell you what, Loot. In hell I'll buy you a round.

This reminds me of this Heinlein book I read a while back, Job: A Comedy of Justice. The main character goes to hell and it was pretty awesome, and Lucifer was a pretty chill dude, too.

-TG


+ the majority of interesting people that ever lived will be there

+ I'm pretty sure the human brain will eventually adapt to experiencing any pain (or maybe even fetishize it hmm ... )
Highest score: 3063; Highest position: 67;
Winner of {World War II tournament, -team 2010 Skilled Diversity, [FuN||Chewy]-[XII] USA};
8-3-7
User avatar
Major Haggis_McMutton
 
Posts: 403
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:32 am

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby Frigidus on Wed Apr 18, 2012 2:47 am

I've heard of the idea of heaven being a place where you just "bask in the glory of God" before, and it doesn't sound all that much better than the classical definition of hell to me. Being enthralled for eternity would suck, and if it wasn't some sort of magic that was holding your eternal interest then heaven must be the home of some of the most intense God fanboying that has ever existed.
User avatar
Sergeant Frigidus
 
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:15 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby BigBallinStalin on Wed Apr 18, 2012 7:25 am

Imagine all those sweaty, smelly God-nerds with their collectible cards of the angels and apostles.
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby chang50 on Wed Apr 18, 2012 7:43 am

BigBallinStalin wrote:Imagine all those sweaty, smelly God-nerds with their collectible cards of the angels and apostles.


I'd go crazy after 5 minutes in that place,but I am fussy about the company I keep.I just sincerely hope there is no eternal life to be had anywhere,the thing that makes life worth living is the knowledge that it is finite.
User avatar
Captain chang50
 
Posts: 659
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:54 am
Location: pattaya,thailand

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby zimmah on Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:10 am

pmchugh wrote:I''m tired of circling. A person may choose to commit a crime but that does not mean the punishment necessarily fits the crime. I still don't get why God can't give people an infinite amount of chances, make Earth last forever and hey presto no eternal pain for sinners. He is all-powerfull after all.



unfortunatly, that is not possible.

the earth itself is the heritage for the just people, in order for the just to be able to life in peace, the warmongers and sinners need to be gone from it first.

about 6000 years of human civilization has proofed that global peace is not possible by human means.

oh yes by God the eternal dictator himself.


this is exactly the behavior that adam and eve had when they turned their back on god, and that's exactly the reason we're in this mess in the first place. Does god not have the right to be 'a dictator'? he created everything and not only that, he also knows what is good for us, and he wants all the best for us, and he wants us to be happy. What human government ever even tried to bring global happyness and equility? And how many ever succeeded? God has both the power and the will to reach this. Is it so bad to have god as the supreme ruler, instead of humans who are not perfect? Besides, god is in no way a dictotar, he gave the throne to jesus and 144.000 humans who have been risen from the death in heavenly form (so they are kinda 'upgraded' to angels) (most of them are allready risen but some are still alive on earth) so basically those 144.000 are the government with jesus as king. I'd prefer to have them lead me then any president, king, queen, emperor, or wahetever human leader.

i'm really sad that you don't see the impace of your words and don't understand that a heavenly government is much more beneficial to humankind than having an imperfect human government.

and tell me, what has god ever done wrong to you or anyone? and while answering that question, keep in mind that the devil is the ruler of this world ever since adam and eve ate the fruit untill the point where jesus will bind the devil for 1000 years. (which is soon to come but has not happened yet) and the wars and such are the result of human goverments.

also, TRUE christians are not involved in wars. use your head dude, why would true christians, who believe in a heavenly government, even get involved in earthern politics? TRUE CHRISTIAN ARE STRICLY NEUTRAL! which means we do NOT vote, do NOT greet flags, do NOT support our country in wars, etc. (we DO pay taxes and DO obey the law though, however, the law of the bible is above any human law, so whenever the law tell us to do something that goes against the biblical laws, we will refuse EVEN if the result is prison or death penalty.) Earthen governments are only temporarily, but the kingdom of Jesus is everlasting.

also, the bible wants us to actively SEEK the truth, that is not burying the head in the sand and ignoring the facts, instead, it's seeking out the facts and finding out the ultimate truth. do you know with whole your heart that you know the truth? if not, keep looking.

don't just assume god is cruel, he isn't, don't just believe the lies you hear about him, RESEARCH on your own. get to know god, you can be gods friend, he wants you to be.

BigBallinStalin wrote:Imagine all those sweaty, smelly God-nerds with their collectible cards of the angels and apostles.


lol, good thing i stay on earth, i like earth, and i wouldn't even want to go to heaven. humans are designed to live on earth anyway. consider this: god created man from earth, to live on earth, their mission: populate the earth and take care for the plants and animals, and take whatever you need to feel comfortable from it (there's enough for everyone). they weren't designed to die, the fact that we die, is because they sinned. if they wouldn't have sinned, they would live on earth forever. God wants to restore the situation to how it was before adam and eve sinned. hence, what will happen in the end is that the vast mayority of mankind will life on a perfect earth, as it was before the sin.

it doesn't even make any sense at all to assume we go to heaven, what the hell do we need to do in heaven anyway?
Click image to enlarge.
image
User avatar
Major zimmah
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: VDLL

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby BigBallinStalin on Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:16 am

zimmah wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Imagine all those sweaty, smelly God-nerds with their collectible cards of the angels and apostles.


lol, good thing i stay on earth, i like earth, and i wouldn't even want to go to heaven. humans are designed to live on earth anyway. consider this: god created man from earth, to live on earth, their mission: populate the earth and take care for the plants and animals, and take whatever you need to feel comfortable from it (there's enough for everyone). they weren't designed to die, the fact that we die, is because they sinned. if they wouldn't have sinned, they would live on earth forever. God wants to restore the situation to how it was before adam and eve sinned. hence, what will happen in the end is that the vast mayority of mankind will life on a perfect earth, as it was before the sin.

it doesn't even make any sense at all to assume we go to heaven, what the hell do we need to do in heaven anyway?


I hate to break it to ya, but resources are scarce--they aren't abundant; otherwise, everyone can get anything at prices at zero or close to zero.

You know, I think you're a good comedian, or troll. If you're being serious about "they weren't designed to die, the fact that we die, is because they sinned," then that's okay--it's still a really funny cause-and-effect explanation!
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby zimmah on Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:41 am

BigBallinStalin wrote:
zimmah wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Imagine all those sweaty, smelly God-nerds with their collectible cards of the angels and apostles.


lol, good thing i stay on earth, i like earth, and i wouldn't even want to go to heaven. humans are designed to live on earth anyway. consider this: god created man from earth, to live on earth, their mission: populate the earth and take care for the plants and animals, and take whatever you need to feel comfortable from it (there's enough for everyone). they weren't designed to die, the fact that we die, is because they sinned. if they wouldn't have sinned, they would live on earth forever. God wants to restore the situation to how it was before adam and eve sinned. hence, what will happen in the end is that the vast mayority of mankind will life on a perfect earth, as it was before the sin.

it doesn't even make any sense at all to assume we go to heaven, what the hell do we need to do in heaven anyway?


I hate to break it to ya, but resources are scarce--they aren't abundant; otherwise, everyone can get anything at prices at zero or close to zero.

You know, I think you're a good comedian, or troll. If you're being serious about "they weren't designed to die, the fact that we die, is because they sinned," then that's okay--it's still a really funny cause-and-effect explanation!


resources are abundant, but we waste them.
Click image to enlarge.
image
User avatar
Major zimmah
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: VDLL

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby zimmah on Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:42 am

BigBallinStalin wrote:
zimmah wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Imagine all those sweaty, smelly God-nerds with their collectible cards of the angels and apostles.


lol, good thing i stay on earth, i like earth, and i wouldn't even want to go to heaven. humans are designed to live on earth anyway. consider this: god created man from earth, to live on earth, their mission: populate the earth and take care for the plants and animals, and take whatever you need to feel comfortable from it (there's enough for everyone). they weren't designed to die, the fact that we die, is because they sinned. if they wouldn't have sinned, they would live on earth forever. God wants to restore the situation to how it was before adam and eve sinned. hence, what will happen in the end is that the vast mayority of mankind will life on a perfect earth, as it was before the sin.

it doesn't even make any sense at all to assume we go to heaven, what the hell do we need to do in heaven anyway?


I hate to break it to ya, but resources are scarce--they aren't abundant; otherwise, everyone can get anything at prices at zero or close to zero.

You know, I think you're a good comedian, or troll. If you're being serious about "they weren't designed to die, the fact that we die, is because they sinned," then that's okay--it's still a really funny cause-and-effect explanation!


then tell me, why do we die?
Click image to enlarge.
image
User avatar
Major zimmah
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: VDLL

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby BigBallinStalin on Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:46 am

zimmah wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:
zimmah wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Imagine all those sweaty, smelly God-nerds with their collectible cards of the angels and apostles.


lol, good thing i stay on earth, i like earth, and i wouldn't even want to go to heaven. humans are designed to live on earth anyway. consider this: god created man from earth, to live on earth, their mission: populate the earth and take care for the plants and animals, and take whatever you need to feel comfortable from it (there's enough for everyone). they weren't designed to die, the fact that we die, is because they sinned. if they wouldn't have sinned, they would live on earth forever. God wants to restore the situation to how it was before adam and eve sinned. hence, what will happen in the end is that the vast mayority of mankind will life on a perfect earth, as it was before the sin.

it doesn't even make any sense at all to assume we go to heaven, what the hell do we need to do in heaven anyway?


I hate to break it to ya, but resources are scarce--they aren't abundant; otherwise, everyone can get anything at prices at zero or close to zero.

You know, I think you're a good comedian, or troll. If you're being serious about "they weren't designed to die, the fact that we die, is because they sinned," then that's okay--it's still a really funny cause-and-effect explanation!


resources are abundant, but we waste them.


Since we waste them, doesn't that mean that there's less resources? How can resources be abundant if there's less of them over time?
Last edited by BigBallinStalin on Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby BigBallinStalin on Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:47 am

zimmah wrote:
then tell me, why do we die?


Here's a good start:


The seven types of aging damage proposed by de Grey (The Seven Deadly Things)
Main article: Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence

Cancer-causing nuclear mutations/epimutations:

These are changes to the nuclear DNA (nDNA), the molecule that contains our genetic information, or to proteins which bind to the nDNA. Certain mutations can lead to cancer, and, according to de Grey, non-cancerous mutations and epimutations do not contribute to aging within a normal lifespan, so cancer is the only endpoint of these types of damage that must be addressed.

Mitochondrial mutations:

Mitochondria are components in our cells that are important for energy production. They contain their own genetic material, and mutations to their DNA can affect a cell’s ability to function properly. Indirectly, these mutations may accelerate many aspects of aging.

Intracellular aggregates:

Our cells are constantly breaking down proteins and other molecules that are no longer useful or which can be harmful. Those molecules which can’t be digested simply accumulate as junk inside our cells. Atherosclerosis, macular degeneration and all kinds of neurodegenerative diseases (such as Alzheimer's disease) are associated with this problem.

Extracellular aggregates:

Harmful junk protein can also accumulate outside of our cells. The amyloid senile plaque seen in the brains of Alzheimer’s patients is one example.

Cell loss:

Some of the cells in our bodies cannot be replaced, or can only be replaced very slowly - more slowly than they die. This decrease in cell number causes the heart to become weaker with age, and it also causes Parkinson's disease and impairs the immune system.

Cell senescence:

This is a phenomenon where the cells are no longer able to divide, but also do not die and let others divide. They may also do other things that they’re not supposed to, like secreting proteins that could be harmful. Immune senescence and type 2 diabetes are caused by this.[citation needed]

Extracellular crosslinks:

Cells are held together by special linking proteins. When too many cross-links form between cells in a tissue, the tissue can lose its elasticity and cause problems including arteriosclerosis and presbyopia.[7]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aubrey_de_Grey#The_seven_types_of_aging_damage_proposed_by_de_Grey_.28The_Seven_Deadly_Things.29
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby chang50 on Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:52 am

zimmah wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:
zimmah wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Imagine all those sweaty, smelly God-nerds with their collectible cards of the angels and apostles.


lol, good thing i stay on earth, i like earth, and i wouldn't even want to go to heaven. humans are designed to live on earth anyway. consider this: god created man from earth, to live on earth, their mission: populate the earth and take care for the plants and animals, and take whatever you need to feel comfortable from it (there's enough for everyone). they weren't designed to die, the fact that we die, is because they sinned. if they wouldn't have sinned, they would live on earth forever. God wants to restore the situation to how it was before adam and eve sinned. hence, what will happen in the end is that the vast mayority of mankind will life on a perfect earth, as it was before the sin.

it doesn't even make any sense at all to assume we go to heaven, what the hell do we need to do in heaven anyway?


I hate to break it to ya, but resources are scarce--they aren't abundant; otherwise, everyone can get anything at prices at zero or close to zero.

You know, I think you're a good comedian, or troll. If you're being serious about "they weren't designed to die, the fact that we die, is because they sinned," then that's okay--it's still a really funny cause-and-effect explanation!


then tell me, why do we die?


Three cheers for Adam and Eve then,they've saved mankind from eternal tedium..
User avatar
Captain chang50
 
Posts: 659
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:54 am
Location: pattaya,thailand

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby zimmah on Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:58 am

the current market economy doesn't care about people, it only cares about profit, and if everything is readily available you can't make profit like you said, therefore they stockpile huge amounts of oil, gold, iron, etc. they make abundant of useless things from it, most of it which never even sells. They create a fake shortage of houses for example, just so the price doesn't go down. all they care about is profit.
Click image to enlarge.
image
User avatar
Major zimmah
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: VDLL

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby zimmah on Wed Apr 18, 2012 11:00 am

BigBallinStalin wrote:
zimmah wrote:
then tell me, why do we die?


Here's a good start:


The seven types of aging damage proposed by de Grey (The Seven Deadly Things)
Main article: Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence

Cancer-causing nuclear mutations/epimutations:

These are changes to the nuclear DNA (nDNA), the molecule that contains our genetic information, or to proteins which bind to the nDNA. Certain mutations can lead to cancer, and, according to de Grey, non-cancerous mutations and epimutations do not contribute to aging within a normal lifespan, so cancer is the only endpoint of these types of damage that must be addressed.

Mitochondrial mutations:

Mitochondria are components in our cells that are important for energy production. They contain their own genetic material, and mutations to their DNA can affect a cell’s ability to function properly. Indirectly, these mutations may accelerate many aspects of aging.

Intracellular aggregates:

Our cells are constantly breaking down proteins and other molecules that are no longer useful or which can be harmful. Those molecules which can’t be digested simply accumulate as junk inside our cells. Atherosclerosis, macular degeneration and all kinds of neurodegenerative diseases (such as Alzheimer's disease) are associated with this problem.

Extracellular aggregates:

Harmful junk protein can also accumulate outside of our cells. The amyloid senile plaque seen in the brains of Alzheimer’s patients is one example.

Cell loss:

Some of the cells in our bodies cannot be replaced, or can only be replaced very slowly - more slowly than they die. This decrease in cell number causes the heart to become weaker with age, and it also causes Parkinson's disease and impairs the immune system.

Cell senescence:

This is a phenomenon where the cells are no longer able to divide, but also do not die and let others divide. They may also do other things that they’re not supposed to, like secreting proteins that could be harmful. Immune senescence and type 2 diabetes are caused by this.[citation needed]

Extracellular crosslinks:

Cells are held together by special linking proteins. When too many cross-links form between cells in a tissue, the tissue can lose its elasticity and cause problems including arteriosclerosis and presbyopia.[7]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aubrey_de_Grey#The_seven_types_of_aging_damage_proposed_by_de_Grey_.28The_Seven_Deadly_Things.29


that is just the effect, not the cause or reason.

why does our body, which is healing itself all it's life suddenly stop healing itself?
Click image to enlarge.
image
User avatar
Major zimmah
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: VDLL

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby BigBallinStalin on Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:05 pm

zimmah wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:
zimmah wrote:
then tell me, why do we die?


Here's a good start:


The seven types of aging damage proposed by de Grey (The Seven Deadly Things)
Main article: Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence

Cancer-causing nuclear mutations/epimutations:

These are changes to the nuclear DNA (nDNA), the molecule that contains our genetic information, or to proteins which bind to the nDNA. Certain mutations can lead to cancer, and, according to de Grey, non-cancerous mutations and epimutations do not contribute to aging within a normal lifespan, so cancer is the only endpoint of these types of damage that must be addressed.

Mitochondrial mutations:

Mitochondria are components in our cells that are important for energy production. They contain their own genetic material, and mutations to their DNA can affect a cell’s ability to function properly. Indirectly, these mutations may accelerate many aspects of aging.

Intracellular aggregates:

Our cells are constantly breaking down proteins and other molecules that are no longer useful or which can be harmful. Those molecules which can’t be digested simply accumulate as junk inside our cells. Atherosclerosis, macular degeneration and all kinds of neurodegenerative diseases (such as Alzheimer's disease) are associated with this problem.

Extracellular aggregates:

Harmful junk protein can also accumulate outside of our cells. The amyloid senile plaque seen in the brains of Alzheimer’s patients is one example.

Cell loss:

Some of the cells in our bodies cannot be replaced, or can only be replaced very slowly - more slowly than they die. This decrease in cell number causes the heart to become weaker with age, and it also causes Parkinson's disease and impairs the immune system.

Cell senescence:

This is a phenomenon where the cells are no longer able to divide, but also do not die and let others divide. They may also do other things that they’re not supposed to, like secreting proteins that could be harmful. Immune senescence and type 2 diabetes are caused by this.[citation needed]

Extracellular crosslinks:

Cells are held together by special linking proteins. When too many cross-links form between cells in a tissue, the tissue can lose its elasticity and cause problems including arteriosclerosis and presbyopia.[7]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aubrey_de_Grey#The_seven_types_of_aging_damage_proposed_by_de_Grey_.28The_Seven_Deadly_Things.29


that is just the effect, not the cause or reason.

why does our body, which is healing itself all it's life suddenly stop healing itself?


Many people die of "old age." The above are causes of aging. They're not effects of aging. If you disagree, then why are the above "just the effect, not the cause or reason"?

Because of the reasons already stated above. It's not like the body suddenly stops healing itself. Basically, over time its repair rate is slower than the rate of its dilapidation.


Anyway, here's your stance: "they weren't designed to die, the fact that we die, is because they sinned,"

How do you know?
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby BigBallinStalin on Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:11 pm

zimmah wrote:the current market economy doesn't care about people, it only cares about profit, and if everything is readily available you can't make profit like you said, therefore they stockpile huge amounts of oil, gold, iron, etc. they make abundant of useless things from it, most of it which never even sells. They create a fake shortage of houses for example, just so the price doesn't go down. all they care about is profit.


Is profit-seeking morally wrong?
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby pmchugh on Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:20 pm

Oh God. Zimmah first off, my arguments were specifically against nightstrikes God who punishes sin, you've shifted the goal posts significantly but I will try to reword my accusations to your rather unique version of Christianity.

zimmah wrote:
pmchugh wrote:I''m tired of circling. A person may choose to commit a crime but that does not mean the punishment necessarily fits the crime. I still don't get why God can't give people an infinite amount of chances, make Earth last forever and hey presto no eternal pain for sinners. He is all-powerfull after all.



unfortunatly, that is not possible.

the earth itself is the heritage for the just people, in order for the just to be able to life in peace, the warmongers and sinners need to be gone from it first.

about 6000 years of human civilization has proofed that global peace is not possible by human means.


I only suggested this because there was no death in night strikes system. And i'm sure God could create a second habitable planet for the baddies if he so wished.

oh yes by God the eternal dictator himself.


this is exactly the behavior that adam and eve had when they turned their back on god, and that's exactly the reason we're in this mess in the first place. Does god not have the right to be 'a dictator'? he created everything and not only that, he also knows what is good for us, and he wants all the best for us, and he wants us to be happy. What human government ever even tried to bring global happyness and equility? And how many ever succeeded? God has both the power and the will to reach this.


No, my parents have to right to dictate what I should do. Again I am sure my parents want what makes me happy etc. but that doesn't give them the right to dictate anything to me. The system proposed by yourself does not provide equality, it has two levels of people; those who earn eternal life and those who don't. Humans are shades of grey and splitting them into two distinct groups is not a solution to the great equality problem.

Is it so bad to have god as the supreme ruler, instead of humans who are not perfect? Besides, god is in no way a dictotar, he gave the throne to jesus and 144.000 humans who have been risen from the death in heavenly form (so they are kinda 'upgraded' to angels) (most of them are allready risen but some are still alive on earth) so basically those 144.000 are the government with jesus as king. I'd prefer to have them lead me then any president, king, queen, emperor, or wahetever human leader.


By what standard is God perfectly good? God created morality and according to nightstrike, sin is merely disobeying God. God is only good because he writes the definition of good. He is Jesus. As for the 144,000 upgraded humans (with wings?) we are getting into a realm where I wonder why I bother to give you so many, many concessions. Question: How do you decide that this is a literal story but some of the passages in the Bible are not literal?

and tell me, what has god ever done wrong to you or anyone? and while answering that question, keep in mind that the devil is the ruler of this world ever since adam and eve ate the fruit untill the point where jesus will bind the devil for 1000 years. (which is soon to come but has not happened yet) and the wars and such are the result of human goverments.


God is indirectly responsible for everything. Why does he get credited with the good but not the bad? One can't exist without the other.

also, TRUE christians are not involved in wars. use your head dude, why would true christians, who believe in a heavenly government, even get involved in earthern politics? TRUE CHRISTIAN ARE STRICLY NEUTRAL! which means we do NOT vote, do NOT greet flags, do NOT support our country in wars, etc. (we DO pay taxes and DO obey the law though, however, the law of the bible is above any human law, so whenever the law tell us to do something that goes against the biblical laws, we will refuse EVEN if the result is prison or death penalty.) Earthen governments are only temporarily, but the kingdom of Jesus is everlasting.


That is a Logical fallacy. Also God takes sides in wars in the Bible, according to your standard not even God is a true Christian.

also, the bible wants us to actively SEEK the truth, that is not burying the head in the sand and ignoring the facts, instead, it's seeking out the facts and finding out the ultimate truth. do you know with whole your heart that you know the truth? if not, keep looking.


Your views on evolution are so clearly burying your head in the sand.. you even said there was "no evidence " for it. Enough said.

In summary:
1. God creates the rules.
2. God creates beings who physically cannot follow all of the rules.
3. God then separates out these people into two groups, one who believe he exists (and follow an unknown amount of his rules) and the other who have the audacity to question quite ridiculous claims.
4. Based on this rather random split he gives one group eternal happiness and the other group eternal punishment nothingness.
2009-08-12 03:35:31 - Squirrels Hat: MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!
2009-08-12 03:44:25 - Mr. Squirrel: Do you think my hat will attack me?
User avatar
Colonel pmchugh
 
Posts: 1264
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 7:40 pm

Re: What do Christians really think of Non-Believers?

Postby zimmah on Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:54 pm

BigBallinStalin wrote:

Anyway, here's your stance: "they weren't designed to die, the fact that we die, is because they sinned,"

How do you know?


because it's in the bible AND it makes sense scientifically.

there's no biological reason why humans have to die. The fact that we care so much about life and death proves that death is unnatural. The self-healing capacities of the body which suddenly slow down at old age are also very weird and no scientist has really found the reason for it. We can explain the aging itself but not the reason behind it. And we can cure some of the effects but not the aging itself.

Is profit-seeking morally wrong?


if you seek profit, do you think you love your neighbors as yourself? or do you seek profit to be richer then your neighbors, if the latter is the case, it's morally wrong, as it goes directly against the second most important commandment in the bible.

I only suggested this because there was no death in night strikes system. And i'm sure God could create a second habitable planet for the baddies if he so wished.


correct, but the baddies do not want to have god as a ruler, therefore, god gives them the option not to live. for there is no live without god.

No, my parents have to right to dictate what I should do. Again I am sure my parents want what makes me happy etc. but that doesn't give them the right to dictate anything to me. The system proposed by yourself does not provide equality, it has two levels of people; those who earn eternal life and those who don't. Humans are shades of grey and splitting them into two distinct groups is not a solution to the great equality problem.


to god there's either good or bad. but only he can decide who's in the good or bad side. Yes, some people who claim to be Christians will be considered bad, and people who claim not to be christian may be considered good, but even then it's better to try and do what god wants you to do. In the end, there will be equality, because in the end, there are no baddies anymore. This world will reach it's climax soon Jesus will wage war against the devil and his system, destroy it, imprison the devil for 1000 years allowing the remainder of mankind and those who have died before the climax to recover and after the 1000 years the devil will be unleashed for a short period of time for the last time, then the final moment of truth will be, at that point, you can make the ultimate decision, do i want to live in the world where you have lived a 1000 years in peace for the rest of eternity or do you not want to, it's up to you.

By what standard is God perfectly good? God created morality and according to nightstrike, sin is merely disobeying God. God is only good because he writes the definition of good. He is Jesus. As for the 144,000 upgraded humans (with wings?) we are getting into a realm where I wonder why I bother to give you so many, many concessions. Question: How do you decide that this is a literal story but some of the passages in the Bible are not literal?


we do not know what they look like exactly. I do know people who are among the 144.000 but obviously i won't be able to talk to them after they die, at least not now, maybe in the 1000 years of peace, when they act as priests and kings for humanity. I know it's literal because it makes sense that way, i allready explained that it wouldn't make sense for all of humankind to live in heaven, what do we do there, sing songs, collect cards of angels, play magic the gathering, poke fun at the poor souls in hell, wander as ghosts in this world? doesn't make sense to me.

god is jesus? then how do you explain this:

mark 1:11 wrote:And a voice came from heaven: "You are my Son, whom I love; with you I am well pleased."


he's pleased with himself?

and this?

Luke 22:42 wrote:Saying, Father, if you be willing, remove this cup from me: nevertheless not my will, but yours, be done.


his will and his fathers will are not the same? how can this be if he's one person? and besides, the father is greater then him.

John 14:28 wrote:You have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If you loved me, you would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.


Luke 3:21 wrote:Now when all the people were baptized, it came to pass, that when Jesus also was baptized, and praying, the heaven was opened,


jesus often prayed, was he talkng to himself then?

and how do you explain this?

john 11:41 wrote:So they took away the stone. Then Jesus looked up and said, “Father, I thank you that you have heard me. 42I knew that you always hear me, but I said this for the benefit of the people standing here, that they may believe that you sent me.”


it is total none-sense to claim Jesus is God. the bible does not support this idea in the slightest.

God is indirectly responsible for everything. Why does he get credited with the good but not the bad? One can't exist without the other.


so if your parents tell you "don't do drugs" and you go out and you do drugs and you get a bad trip from it, who's responsible, you, or your parents?

That is a Logical fallacy. Also God takes sides in wars in the Bible, according to your standard not even God is a true Christian.


it's not, you can not be a christian if you don't accept his kingdom, it's as simple as that. Unlike human governments which are bound by geographical locations, gods kingdom is not bound by a geographical location and you can choose to be either part of it or don't be part of it, based on your actions and believe. Off course not everyone is perfect in their actions, but a true christian will at least try to do best he can. And god took sides in war only to protect (and punish) his nation. To understand that you have to actually understand the basic idea of the bible and it's not something we can discuss easily in a matter of minutes. It takes deep knowledge of the bible.

Your views on evolution are so clearly burying your head in the sand.. you even said there was "no evidence " for it. Enough said.


there isn't you keep saying there is, but there's more evidence for the stories in the bible then there is for anything that counters the bible. furthermore you nor anyone else could ever show me any evidence that convinces me and the billions of other believers around the world that the bible is not true. So who is sticking the head in the sand now?

Don't blaim me for being ignorant, while it is you being too lazy to truly seek the truth and obey gods superior leadership, instead you find it easier to somewhat obey a human government. I seriously can't believe how stupid humanity has become.

gods rules are simple and boil down to only two rules:

1) love god
2) love other human beings as yourself

all of the other rules are included in this one, and are just in place to make life easier on us.
Click image to enlarge.
image
User avatar
Major zimmah
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: VDLL

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users