The evidence shows

[Maugena]

Conservatives are now the official champions of tolerance, and still undisputed champions of charity.

They are not and you are not...

We are too, even if only defacto concerning the daily display of intolerance concerning Christianity, conservatism, people who think marriage is between one man and one woman, racism, and class warfare.

smearing Phatscotty while mentioning nothing of the topic at hand is a CC pastime.

I cannot even begin to comprehend how a mind becomes so irreversibly lost to it's own delusions. Actually, I take that back, I know that it can. The mind is a very powerful thing. I suppose I said that just for dramatic effect. In any case, somewhere along the lines, you lost an idea of what fundamentals are good and bad. Honestly it shouldn't even be so black and white. All things should be taken into consideration, but not entirely discounted. You learn from foolishness. That's why it's good. But its use ends there. Okay, I'm officially ranting...

This is 'smearing'. (And rambling, couldn't think of the right word at the time. My excuse? Super tired.)

Everything outside of that was a reflection on you.

And I'm so sorry for going off-topic in your thread, but when you spew bullshit and I happen to read it, I will call you the f*ck out.

You know what, I need to take a step back. I need to not take you seriously anymore. It's just too much. Not only that, but I don't want to get myself in trouble. Here's to a more collected Maugena when it comes to him reading Phatscotty's 'posts'.

Cheers!

[Phatscotty]

#5. Take notice of the fact that no one here on the ConquerClub forums have really taken a stance against conservative views. It seems like you're declaring your own personal war on liberals. (Which, I might add, is completely illegitimate because of all these skewed perspectives you keep spinning.)

I'd like to point out here that there is a world of difference between disagreeing with conservative principles and attacking people that hold conservative principles. PhatScotty routinely fights over the character of individuals he disagrees with rather than the issue itself. It is easy to attack the character of the opposing side, but it is pointless and counter-productive. The bullshit dick measuring that occurs in discussions like this is ultimately why the world is so fucked up right now. Both sides are so busy pointing at each other and yelling angrily that they can't see the piss poor job that their own party is doing.

My point is, arguing over which side has the biggest douchebags or which side knows more about trivial shit is a waste of time. Nobody's keeping score. All it does is stroke your own ego.

oh, that is such bullshit. I routinely demand people stop smearing my character on focus on the issues.

Yet you still engage in character assassination.

examples? Telling the truth about someone is not character assassination. It's character assessment.

[Phatscotty]

Conservatives are now the official champions of tolerance, and still undisputed champions of charity.

They are not and you are not...

We are too, even if only defacto concerning the daily display of intolerance concerning Christianity, conservatism, people who think marriage is between one man and one woman, racism, and class warfare.

smearing Phatscotty while mentioning nothing of the topic at hand is a CC pastime.

I cannot even begin to comprehend how a mind becomes so irreversibly lost to it's own delusions. Actually, I take that back, I know that it can. The mind is a very powerful thing. I suppose I said that just for dramatic effect. In any case, somewhere along the lines, you lost an idea of what fundamentals are good and bad. Honestly it shouldn't even be so black and white. All things should be taken into consideration, but not entirely discounted. You learn from foolishness. That's why it's good. But its use ends there. Okay, I'm officially ranting...

This is 'smearing'. (And rambling, couldn't think of the right word at the time. My excuse? Super tired.)
.
Everything outside of that was a reflection on you.

And I'm so sorry for going off-topic in your thread, but when you spew bullshit and I happen to read it, I will call you the f*ck out.

You know what, I need to take a step back. I need to not take you seriously anymore. It's just too much. Not only that, but I don't want to get myself in trouble. Here's to a more collected Maugena when it comes to him reading Phatscotty's 'posts'.

Cheers!

I wasn't talking about you....

ya stick

[chang50]

#5. Take notice of the fact that no one here on the ConquerClub forums have really taken a stance against conservative views. It seems like you're declaring your own personal war on liberals. (Which, I might add, is completely illegitimate because of all these skewed perspectives you keep spinning.)

I'd like to point out here that there is a world of difference between disagreeing with conservative principles and attacking people that hold conservative principles. PhatScotty routinely fights over the character of individuals he disagrees with rather than the issue itself. It is easy to attack the character of the opposing side, but it is pointless and counter-productive. The bullshit dick measuring that occurs in discussions like this is ultimately why the world is so fucked up right now. Both sides are so busy pointing at each other and yelling angrily that they can't see the piss poor job that their own party is doing.

My point is, arguing over which side has the biggest douchebags or which side knows more about trivial shit is a waste of time. Nobody's keeping score. All it does is stroke your own ego.

oh, that is such bullshit. I routinely demand people stop smearing my character on focus on the issues.

Yet you still engage in character assassination.

examples? Telling the truth about someone is not character assassination. It's character assessment.

It must be hard work being right all the time?How do you manage it?

[Phatscotty]

trying to make sure one isn't wrong is a good start.

thanks for providing no examples, and even reinforcing my original point.

If that was meant to be funny, you have a future in comedy

[natty dread]

Phatscotty, why do you have to be such a racist?

[vodean]

Phatscotty, why do you have to be such a racist?

uhhhh...

[Frigidus]

Telling the truth about someone is not character assassination. It's character assessment.

Whatever you call it, a person's character is irrelevant to political arguments. Play the ball, not the man.

[Phatscotty]

Telling the truth about someone is not character assassination. It's character assessment.

Whatever you call it, a person's character is irrelevant to political arguments. Play the ball, not the man.

We aren't playing here. I only assume the person who brought it up is talking about something else. They have not cited any examples yet, so really the game has not been started. Unless you count the daily attacks on my character as well as others

[Timminz]

I was going to take this thread seriously, but then I realized it was started by a guy who supports police brutality, and holding poor people to higher standards than rich people.


How's that for a character assessment?

[natty dread]

I was going to take this thread seriously, but then I realized it was started by a guy who supports police brutality, and holding poor people to higher standards than rich people.


How's that for a character assessment?

Not to mention he's a racist.

[Symmetry]

I was going to take this thread seriously, but then I realized it was started by a guy who supports police brutality, and holding poor people to higher standards than rich people.


How's that for a character assessment?

Not to mention he's a racist.

Scotty isn't a racist, he just supports racists because he doesn't like people who oppose racism. To go full Godwin, he'd be throwing rocks through Jewish people's windows on kristallnacht, but not because he's anti-semitic, he'd be doing it because he thought it was a legitimate way to piss off people who thought anti-Semitism was a problem.

[Haggis_McMutton]

I was going to take this thread seriously, but then I realized it was started by a guy who supports police brutality, and holding poor people to higher standards than rich people.


How's that for a character assessment?

Not to mention he's a racist.

Scotty isn't a racist, he just supports racists because he doesn't like people who oppose racism. To go full Godwin, he'd be throwing rocks through Jewish people's windows on kristallnacht, but not because he's anti-semitic, he'd be doing it because he thought it was a legitimate way to piss off people who thought anti-Semitism was a problem.

This is exactly it. It's also what's so scary about his attitude.

He is so invested in this "us vs. them" bullshit that he sees it necessary to defend cops killing citizens for mouthing off.

[chang50]

I was going to take this thread seriously, but then I realized it was started by a guy who supports police brutality, and holding poor people to higher standards than rich people.


How's that for a character assessment?

Not to mention he's a racist.

Scotty isn't a racist, he just supports racists because he doesn't like people who oppose racism. To go full Godwin, he'd be throwing rocks through Jewish people's windows on kristallnacht, but not because he's anti-semitic, he'd be doing it because he thought it was a legitimate way to piss off people who thought anti-Semitism was a problem.

This is exactly it. It's also what's so scary about his attitude.

He is so invested in this "us vs. them" bullshit that he sees it necessary to defend cops killing citizens for mouthing off.

I think it's called a 'seige mentality',and ironically the more it is pointed out the deeper he will retreat into it.Everything is filtered thru' his strong confirmation bias.

[Phatscotty]

I just said it was dumb to mouth off. Look how crazy you guys get. Look at all the bullshit you make up.

Actually, it's flattering. If all you contribute-nothings slander-everythings have your targets on my back, I must be doing something right.

[chang50]

I just said it was dumb to mouth off. Look how crazy you guys get. Look at all the bullshit you make up.

Actually, it's flattering. If all you contribute-nothings slander-everythings have your targets on my back, I must be doing something right.

'Seige mentality"........

[Phatscotty]

I just said it was dumb to mouth off. Look how crazy you guys get. Look at all the bullshit you make up.

Actually, it's flattering. If all you contribute-nothings slander-everythings have your targets on my back, I must be doing something right.

'Seige mentality"........

You can't even begin to stand on the issue, so just call names.

Always has been a losing argument, always will be. I hope one day you will realize that.

[chang50]

I just said it was dumb to mouth off. Look how crazy you guys get. Look at all the bullshit you make up.

Actually, it's flattering. If all you contribute-nothings slander-everythings have your targets on my back, I must be doing something right.

'Seige mentality"........

You can't even begin to stand on the issue, so just call names.

Always has been a losing argument, always will be. I hope one day you will realize that.

No its character assessment,not assassination,remember?

[Phatscotty]

The truth hurts

[natty dread]

Does it, Phatscotty?

Does it?

[vodean]

I was going to take this thread seriously, but then I realized it was started by a guy who supports police brutality, and holding poor people to higher standards than rich people.


How's that for a character assessment?

Not to mention he's a racist.

Scotty isn't a racist, he just supports racists because he doesn't like people who oppose racism. To go full Godwin, he'd be throwing rocks through Jewish people's windows on kristallnacht, but not because he's anti-semitic, he'd be doing it because he thought it was a legitimate way to piss off people who thought anti-Semitism was a problem.

This is exactly it. It's also what's so scary about his attitude.

He is so invested in this "us vs. them" bullshit that he sees it necessary to defend cops killing citizens for mouthing off.

and yet here you are attacking him (ganging up on him) and criticizing him in the very manner you complain about him doing.

[Haggis_McMutton]

and yet here you are attacking him (ganging up on him) and criticizing him in the very manner you complain about him doing.

uh huh.

and what exactly is the group I identify with and therefore rabidly defend, in your opinion ?

[vodean]

and yet here you are attacking him (ganging up on him) and criticizing him in the very manner you complain about him doing.

uh huh.

and what exactly is the group I identify with and therefore rabidly defend, in your opinion ?

anti-conservatives/andti-scotties... hence liberals

[Haggis_McMutton]

and yet here you are attacking him (ganging up on him) and criticizing him in the very manner you complain about him doing.

uh huh.

and what exactly is the group I identify with and therefore rabidly defend, in your opinion ?

anti-conservatives/andti-scotties... hence liberals

aaaand my point is made. The us vs. them mentality at work.

I am not a liberal or a conservative or anything. The closest label that would fit is probably a-political. I honestly don't give a shit which of the virtually indistinguishable professional manipulators politicians gets elected to office. I don't vote anyway.

[BigBallinStalin]

and yet here you are attacking him (ganging up on him) and criticizing him in the very manner you complain about him doing.

uh huh.

and what exactly is the group I identify with and therefore rabidly defend, in your opinion ?

anti-conservatives/andti-scotties... hence liberals

aaaand my point is made. The us vs. them mentality at work.

I am not a liberal or a conservative or anything. The closest label that would fit is probably a-political. I honestly don't give a shit which of the virtually indistinguishable professional manipulators politicians gets elected to office. I don't vote anyway.

I'll professionally manipulate you when you're finished with PS and vodean, okay hon'?