Conquer Club

Now a F*ckin' Space Science Thread

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Technicality?

Postby Army of GOD on Tue Aug 14, 2012 8:55 pm

Yea, let's see you guy live on Venus. Idiots. Scientists are stupid!
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7191
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Technicality?

Postby kentington on Tue Aug 14, 2012 9:08 pm

Army of GOD wrote:Yea, let's see you guy live on Venus. Idiots. Scientists are stupid!


Venus is nowhere near as fun as Uranus.
User avatar
Sergeant kentington
 
Posts: 611
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 4:50 pm

Re: Technicality?

Postby nietzsche on Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:25 pm

Women are from Venus, Men from Uranus.
el cartoncito mas triste del mundo
User avatar
General nietzsche
 
Posts: 4597
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:29 am
Location: Fantasy Cooperstown

Re: Technicality?

Postby isaiah40 on Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:34 pm

As Obama would say " You didn't land there"
Lieutenant isaiah40
 
Posts: 3990
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:14 pm

Re: Technicality?

Postby zimmah on Wed Aug 15, 2012 5:13 pm

Lootifer wrote:
zimmah wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:
tzor wrote:Dear Science; No you didn't land on Mars, you landed a unsenitent and barely intelligent machine on Mars. You couldn't last five minutes in the smallest of solar storms that frequent the solar system. So please stay inside the nice mangetic field of you planet, that I, your Lord, made for you and not for the other planets, like Mars which has no magnetic field like the earth and no atmosphere to speak of either. Sincerely, Religion's Boss, God.


not sure if trolling or serious

also I thought this was cool Image


even a difference as small as 1% could kill most life on earth.

Yes but that doesnt mean we cant adapt to a specific environment given enough input energy.

i.e. There may not be life there, but we could potentially live there.


well, theoretically we could survive maybe a lifetime on the moon, if we wanted/needed. however, it would not be as good as on earth, and we would need artificial protection from the suns radiation etc.

also, the risk of meteor impacts is much larger, the earths magnetic shield is pretty neat and should not be underestimated, and our moon is pretty unique and essential to a stable rotation, tides, climate, and it acts like a shield as well. temperature, the pressence of water, and a life-supporting atmosphere are not the only good things about the earth, it's quite complex.

ye, potentially we could probably live almost anywhere in the universe, but it's not ideal.
Click image to enlarge.
image
User avatar
Major zimmah
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: VDLL

Re: Technicality?

Postby Lootifer on Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:05 pm

Yeh and thats what the diagram shows really: "Closeness" to earth. Livable temperature, reasonable gravity, stable atmosphere (which rules mars out as you say) etc etc all contribute.

Mars we'd need to stay in our suit and use a shit load of energy on life support; however there may very well be a planet nearby (ie within 50 lys) that might be just a gas tank and thick ski jacket (or conversly lots of sunscreen) in terms of living requirements.
I go to the gym to justify my mockery of fat people.
User avatar
Lieutenant Lootifer
 
Posts: 1084
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Competing

Re: Technicality?

Postby BigBallinStalin on Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:11 pm

I've read Dune, so I know what I'm getting into.
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: Technicality?

Postby tzor on Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:26 pm

Army of GOD wrote:Yea, let's see you guy live on Venus. Idiots. Scientists are stupid!


Venus actually could be terraformed if enough effort was put into it.
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: Technicality?

Postby Army of GOD on Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:47 pm

BigBallinStalin wrote:I've read Dune, so I know what I'm getting into.


I've played the Dune computer game. Does that count?
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7191
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Technicality?

Postby heavycola on Thu Aug 16, 2012 3:40 pm

tzor wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:Yea, let's see you guy live on Venus. Idiots. Scientists are stupid!


Venus actually could be terraformed if enough effort was put into it.


Yeah well, thats lazy-ass democrats for you.

*angers quickly*
*forms advocacy group called 'Concerned Citizens with a Hankering for a Bygone America that Never Existed (and Veterans) for Terraforming Venus*
*marches on washington*
*picks fight with commie-looking cop*
*is tear gassed and arrested*
*becomes brainwashed and radicalised in prison*
*plans and executes major terrorist attack on US soil*

Nice work, tzor. Blood all over your hands. HOW DOES THAT MAKE YOU FEEL?
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class heavycola
 
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

Postby 2dimes on Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:44 pm

Wait is it the real tzor or did someone find his computer still signed in here in front of his skeleton cleaned white and brite by his cats after he died?
User avatar
Corporal 2dimes
 
Posts: 13098
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Re: Technicality?

Postby Juan_Bottom on Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:24 am

THIS IS NOW A SPACE SCIENCE THREAD, F*CK YEAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!!!


Image


This figure shows an actual image of a sunset on Earth compared to artistic representations for the best candidates of potential habitable worlds so far. The image corrects for the size, colors, and brightness of the star and sky as seen from an Earth-like world located in the orbits of these worlds. The size of and colors of the star of Kepler-22 b look similar to Earth because it orbits a Sun-like star. The sunsets of Gliese 667Cc and 581d look much redder because they orbit a red dwarf star, with the sky of Gliese 581d much darker due to its greater distance. The star of HD 85512b is the brightest of all cases although the star of Gliese 667Cc is the biggest. CREDIT: PHL @ UPR Arecibo.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Technicality?

Postby Army of GOD on Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:27 am

Juan_Bottom wrote:THIS IS NOW A SPACE SCIENCE THREAD, F*CK YEAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!!!


Image




OH MY GOD THERE IS WATER ON THE OTHER PLANETS THERE MUST BE LIFE
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7191
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Technicality?

Postby Funkyterrance on Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:43 am

I dont enjoy pompous ecards either.

Billions of tax dollars spent for some pictures of a giant, useless desert. Well done Science!
User avatar
Colonel Funkyterrance
 
Posts: 2494
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:52 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Technicality?

Postby john9blue on Tue Aug 21, 2012 1:35 am

Maugena wrote:Image
???


weren't most non-religious people debating about whether chick-fil-a sandwiches were okay to eat?

another retarded webcomic by a retarded author with a retarded agenda
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Captain john9blue
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: Technicality?

Postby Juan_Bottom on Tue Aug 21, 2012 1:35 am

Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Technicality?

Postby Juan_Bottom on Tue Aug 21, 2012 1:36 am

FOR SCIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEENNNNNCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCEEEEEE!!!!!!!!
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Technicality?

Postby BigBallinStalin on Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:29 am

Image



You could use the same reasoning to justify maintaining the current expenditures to the National Defense.
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: Technicality?

Postby heavycola on Tue Aug 21, 2012 5:02 am

Funkyterrance wrote:
Billions of tax dollars spent bombing the middle east into a giant, useless desert. Well done Military-Industrial Complex!


YEAH!
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class heavycola
 
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

Re: Technicality?

Postby Juan_Bottom on Wed Aug 22, 2012 1:05 am

Image

NASA has selected a new mission to Mars, which is set to launch in 2016. This mission is named InSight, and will be focused on looking into the interior of Mars to see how and why it formed so differently from its neighbouring rocky planet - Earth.
The mission will attempt to discover if the core of Mars is liquid or solid, and why the surface of Mars is not divided into tectonic plates the way ours is.
The InSight mission beat two other proposed missions - one to explore the methane-ethane sea of Titan, and another that hoped to land on a comet.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-19327286


Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Technicality?

Postby Juan_Bottom on Wed Aug 22, 2012 1:07 am

Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Technicality?

Postby Maugena on Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:42 am

john9blue wrote:
Maugena wrote:Image
???


weren't most non-religious people debating about whether chick-fil-a sandwiches were okay to eat?

another retarded webcomic by a retarded author with a retarded agenda

Exactly. However, this seems to be a custom made one by some random user that frequents the site...
At least, that's what I think it is - after looking for this specifically on their website and finding nothing in the non-user e-card section.
Renewed yet infused with apathy.
Let's just have a good time, all right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjQii_BboIk
User avatar
New Recruit Maugena
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 7:07 pm

Re:

Postby tzor on Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:45 am

2dimes wrote:Wait is it the real tzor or did someone find his computer still signed in here in front of his skeleton cleaned white and brite by his cats after he died?


DId you expect some cheep imitation? Name brand Tzors are so dull and tasteless. Get real Tzor!
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: Now a F*ckin' Space Science Thread

Postby Timminz on Wed Aug 22, 2012 8:27 am

tzor wrote:Get real Tzor!


I tend to agree.


Get real, Tzor!
User avatar
Captain Timminz
 
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:05 pm
Location: At the store

Re: Re:

Postby heavycola on Wed Aug 22, 2012 8:31 am

tzor wrote:
2dimes wrote:Wait is it the real tzor or did someone find his computer still signed in here in front of his skeleton cleaned white and brite by his cats after he died?


DId you expect some cheep imitation?


Yes please. Let's hear your bird noises.
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class heavycola
 
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users