Moderator: Community Team
jonesthecurl wrote:california is "ainrofilac" backwards.
Learn to spell, my friend.
saxitoxin wrote:DirtyDishSoap wrote:What in the actual f*ck? So if I pork someone down in Cali, I should immediately get myself checked?
IOW, the first thing DDS did after announcing he wanted to meet me IRL was to research the sex laws in California.
You gotta pretty high opinion of yourself, DDS.
Thorthoth wrote:suxisux, has built a compelling case against you, DDS.
Maybe it's time to come out of the closet about...
1. Your gayness.
&
2. Your incredibly bad taste in men (or whatever suxi is...)
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:It's designed to slowly erode the rights granted by the first amendment, until it no longer exists, and like the frog we've been boiled without noticing it.
-TG
Skoffin wrote: Politicians tend to be pro-anything-that-fucks-up-your-life-long-term. It's why they love medical debt and hate abortions.
mrswdk wrote:TA1LGUNN3R wrote:It's designed to slowly erode the rights granted by the first amendment, until it no longer exists, and like the frog we've been boiled without noticing it.
-TG
First they demand a cake for their wedding, now they are boiling frogs to death????
Next they'll be marrying animals. Phatscotty was right all along.
jonesthecurl wrote:mrswdk wrote:TA1LGUNN3R wrote:It's designed to slowly erode the rights granted by the first amendment, until it no longer exists, and like the frog we've been boiled without noticing it.
-TG
First they demand a cake for their wedding, now they are boiling frogs to death????
Next they'll be marrying animals. Phatscotty was right all along.
Not only that they'll be marrying boiled frogs while sliding down a slippery slope eating gay Boy Scout thin mints..
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:jonesthecurl wrote:mrswdk wrote:TA1LGUNN3R wrote:It's designed to slowly erode the rights granted by the first amendment, until it no longer exists, and like the frog we've been boiled without noticing it.
-TG
First they demand a cake for their wedding, now they are boiling frogs to death????
Next they'll be marrying animals. Phatscotty was right all along.
Not only that they'll be marrying boiled frogs while sliding down a slippery slope eating gay Boy Scout thin mints..
Y'all are laughing, yet Obama expanded the powers of the patriot act, allowing unchecked invasion of electronic transmissions. If they rifled through people's paper mail like this there'd be an outcry. This is just another example.
It's the nature of government to constrict. Each right we believe we have will eventually be taken away while we're distracted with pan et circenses. It's an inevitability.
Not that a couple of the queen's subjects would understand.
-TG
mrswdk wrote:@PS Just for the sake of argument, why shouldn’t two brothers be allowed to make gay porn together?
mrswdk wrote:@PS Just for the sake of argument, why shouldn’t two brothers be allowed to make gay porn together?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users