Moderator: Community Team
NomadPatriot wrote:trolling (present participle)
1.make a deliberately offensive or provocative online post with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them.
Keefie wrote:Isn't it about time this bore received a long term ban ?
jimboston wrote:Keefie wrote:Isn't it about time this bore received a long term ban ?
+1
... but let’s make. it permanent and be done with it.
Keefie wrote:Isn't it about time this bore received a long term ban ?
Common sense prevails - if you are intentionally or continually making this community less enjoyable for others, you may be removed from it. It's that simple.
Neither do the By-Laws from the Podunk 3rd district. Believe it or not, Conquer Club is a private business. Just because something works one way in another community does not mean that is how it will work here. We're usually less strict and you can get away with a lot, but that doesn't mean that you can pull the "This is how it works everywhere else" card and expect to get away with it. Really. This is not "everywhere else."
In the same vein, just because you are here, does not mean you MUST be here. This is a business and CC does reserve the right to promote or discourage any kind of behavior it sees fit. Claiming your first amendment right to free speech to post about the colour of your poop last night will not fly. If a mod or admin specifically say you shouldn't be doing something, regardless of if it's specifically spelled out in the rules, or if you think that they are stupid, it still means don't do it. If you don't like the rules here, google.com will help you find somewhere more appropriate.
Be nice or leave
1. Do NOT be intentionally destructive - If you do anything that harms or can be perceived to harm this site you may be removed from it.
3. Do not push boundaries - If you are asked to stop by a member of the moderation team then STOP. Do not continue and do NOT persist.
nietzsche wrote:Common sense prevails - if you are intentionally or continually making this community less enjoyable for others, you may be removed from it. It's that simple.Neither do the By-Laws from the Podunk 3rd district. Believe it or not, Conquer Club is a private business. Just because something works one way in another community does not mean that is how it will work here. We're usually less strict and you can get away with a lot, but that doesn't mean that you can pull the "This is how it works everywhere else" card and expect to get away with it. Really. This is not "everywhere else."In the same vein, just because you are here, does not mean you MUST be here. This is a business and CC does reserve the right to promote or discourage any kind of behavior it sees fit. Claiming your first amendment right to free speech to post about the colour of your poop last night will not fly. If a mod or admin specifically say you shouldn't be doing something, regardless of if it's specifically spelled out in the rules, or if you think that they are stupid, it still means don't do it. If you don't like the rules here, google.com will help you find somewhere more appropriate.Be nice or leave1. Do NOT be intentionally destructive - If you do anything that harms or can be perceived to harm this site you may be removed from it.3. Do not push boundaries - If you are asked to stop by a member of the moderation team then STOP. Do not continue and do NOT persist.
xroads wrote:jimboston wrote:Keefie wrote:Isn't it about time this bore received a long term ban ?
+1
... but let’s make. it permanent and be done with it.
+2
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
HitRed wrote:
This is so fitting.
HitRed wrote:
This is so fitting.
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
mookiemcgee wrote:HitRed wrote:
This is so fitting.
So... A guy posts a bunch of shit voluntarily in a game forum that he found god knows how. He's free to stop posting and leave anytime, and he's not a paying user of the site. Other (paying) users of the site are annoyed and suggest he be banned for simply being an annoying troll that adds nothing to the community. No bans to his completely free account have ever happened...and he just continues to post garbage and try to frame himself as a martyr.
In your view this is comparable to a big brother Gov't censoring intelligence by killing kids ?
NomadPatriot wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:HitRed wrote:
This is so fitting.
So... A guy posts a bunch of shit voluntarily in a game forum that he found god knows how. He's free to stop posting and leave anytime, and he's not a paying user of the site. Other (paying) users of the site are annoyed and suggest he be banned for simply being an annoying troll that adds nothing to the community. No bans to his completely free account have ever happened...and he just continues to post garbage and try to frame himself as a martyr.
In your view this is comparable to a big brother Gov't censoring intelligence by killing kids ?
key wording --> " Other (paying) users of the site are annoyed "
not everyone who is a premium paid for it.. & suggesting 'paying members' should be allowed to dictate who is allowed on the website or be able to control what happens just because they are Annoyed and got their feelings hurt is a typical Left Wing Extremist position...
just because you are annoyed.. doesn't mean I have done anything wrong...
you are free to ignore me Snookie.. no one forces you to read my posts or forces you to respond to them..
and in the words of the mighty Razorvich " if you do not like what someone posts ignore it. .if you do not want to even see it.. foe them.. "
it is that simple..
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
mookiemcgee wrote:
Yawn.
More crybaby rants about how poorly you are treated, when you act like a tool in every thread.
How is it left wing extremism to believe a private corporation should be able to decide what it wants to do with it's problematic customers (or not so much a customer as freeloader in your case). By your logic it's a left wing extremist belief that a bakery should be able to decide who it wants or doesn't want to sell it's wedding cakes to... except it's the exact opposite. Your acting like there is some bill of rights you signed when created your account. Trolls get banned on the internet, welcome to 2019!
NomadPatriot wrote: suggesting 'paying members' should be allowed to dictate who is allowed on the website or be able to control what happens just because they are Annoyed and got their feelings hurt is a typical Left Wing Extremist position...
jimboston wrote:
The website is a for-profit business. If the paying customers are annoyed by the non-paying drabble, then why isn’t within our right to demand from the operators the removal of said annoyances? If not, we (the paying customers) can threaten to boycott and therefore put the finances of the for-profit enterprise at risk.
jimboston wrote:NomadPatriot wrote: suggesting 'paying members' should be allowed to dictate who is allowed on the website or be able to control what happens just because they are Annoyed and got their feelings hurt is a typical Left Wing Extremist position...
Funny.
This sounds WAY MORE like a Right Wing position.
NomadPatriot wrote:jimboston wrote:
The website is a for-profit business. If the paying customers are annoyed by the non-paying drabble, then why isn’t within our right to demand from the operators the removal of said annoyances? If not, we (the paying customers) can threaten to boycott and therefore put the finances of the for-profit enterprise at risk.
Left-Wing Extremism defined to a tee..
--> "do as we demand because our feelings got hurt or else we will threaten you. .. "
tzor wrote:Looking at this from a completely neutral viewpoint I found this particularly fascinating. The question of "left and right" is also equally fascinating but since censorship tends to generally come from the "left" these days I would tend to lean towards NP on that particular point.
tzor wrote:I'm also fascinated by the notion of "paying customers." There is no forum perks for premium; the payment is only to access more parameters of the game. All customers should be more or less equal in the forums.
tzor wrote:In the ideal world everyone would keep to the topics at hand; there would be no trolling and no personal insulting. Unfortunately, all of this happens all of the time, to various degrees. Rather than throwing out a person because he banged his baseball bat on the roof of the dugout, the general policies here assume you all can act as reasonable adults.
jimboston wrote:NomadPatriot wrote:jimboston wrote:
The website is a for-profit business. If the paying customers are annoyed by the non-paying drabble, then why isn’t within our right to demand from the operators the removal of said annoyances? If not, we (the paying customers) can threaten to boycott and therefore put the finances of the for-profit enterprise at risk.
Left-Wing Extremism defined to a tee..
--> "do as we demand because our feelings got hurt or else we will threaten you. .. "
It’s got nothing to do with feelings.
Your idiotic posts drive paying customers away.
The for-profit enterprise and hurt your feelings by telling you you’re no longer welcome... or they can risk losing money.
The ‘liberal left wing’ move would be to support your right to be an asshole... the conservative business decision is to say “f*ck your feelings” and do what will keep the most paying customers happy.
jimboston wrote:I agree, but it doesn’t work when a few Trolls come in and ruin it for everyone else.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users