OnlyAmbrose wrote:Well, if you're taking a world religions class, it would probably be helpful to know that Catholics do endorse evolution. And no, nature did not "magically" select species to survive and thrive, because nature has no will. Natural selection is a perfectly reasonable concept, however. You can't really deny that if something has unhelpful traits, it will die before it can reproduce. Multiply this process by 3 billion years (give or take) and I don't doubt that the result could be what we have today.
Nonetheless, we believe that humans are God's special creation, for a few reasons, but one of these is simply that humans seem to be the only creatures with a knowledge of God.
Well then this is confusing because I hear from some Christians that you believe the world was supernaturally created - BAM! Or at least you think he did it in 7 days. Now you're telling me that it is evolution. If evolution is true then how did sin come into being? Did sin evolve? I don't see how you account for death, disease, etc. if you believe in evolution. I'm not saying I have the answer but it doesn't seem to me that christianity and evolution can both be true at the same time unless you say that your God created the world in with the specific intent of letting it evolve. Something like God created evolutionary processes.
OnlyAmbrose wrote:He created the angels, but gave them free will so they may freely love him. He certainly knew the consequences this action would have, but apparently freely given love is more valuable to God than the pain which free will would cause.
As for why he allowed man to eat the apple, well that's simple enough - preventing him from doing so would be a violation of free will.
Hmmmm. This one has got me thinking. I've heard it before but not stated like that.
OnlyAmbrose wrote:Well, we believe that he did come down and show himself to everyone. That's what Jesus was all about. Dying for us certainly shows that he is interested in us.
As for proving it, no, you really can't, not empirically, but trying to empirically prove that the existence of an immaterial being seems kind of useless, doesn't it?
You're basically saying the same thing as Goop. So this God became an actual human being. That seems like a lot of trouble to go through instead of just waving his hand and declaring himself to everyone. I get both of your points. So how do you justify that he constantly called himself the son of God. How can someone be both the son of God and actually God at the same time?
OnlyAmbrose wrote:The moral issue Christians are generally most associated with is that of abortion. And the thing is, we believe that abortion IS killing someone.
Other issues, such as gay marriage, I really don't have much of a stance on to begin with. I personally think it's wrong and a sin, but I don't think that a secular state has the right to legislate against it.
Which goes back to free will on the abortion thing. I would never personally pay for an abortion. But there are people who are in bad circumstances that need to have it available. If God is for free will then he shouldn't be mad when someone exercises that free will in the form of an abortion. With gay marriage I think that's just silly. You don't need Christianity or the Bible to say it's wrong. It's obviously anatomically impossible for 2 men having sex to have a baby or 2 women for that matter. This is one reason why I believe there is a creator somewhere. I don't think it's just coincidence that men and women anatomically compliment each other. However, I can't recall hearing even one verse from your holy book where Jesus spoke against homosexuality. Maybe you do.
OnlyAmbrose wrote:Whether or not you accept Jesus is of fundamental importance to salvation, because we believe that Jesus IS your salvation. However, the culpability of not accepting Jesus can be diminished by any number of things. Maybe the Christians in your life are jerks, and are thus driving you away from Christ more than drawing you to him. Or maybe you have legitimate, reasonable concerns about Christianity which are never addressed. Or maybe you just never heard the Good News in its truth.
No. Every Christian I've met or talked to is a nice person. I was really shocked to see all the hatred exhibited here against you guys. I'm not paranoid of you people. You're some of the best tippers in the cafe where I work at!

I ask people I know who are Christians these same things and they usually just say "you gotta have faith". Well I need a little more than that.
OnlyAmbrose wrote:Now, on the topic of "living a good life" - you have to tread softly in this area, because we cannot know the motives behind someone's "good life". A supposedly good external life could be due to less-than-sincere motives. Humility is required in addition to good works.
Now, about Hell - we believe that it is a choice freely made. God is simply not going to stop you from making it. This freely made choice ALWAYS boils down to a lack of love for God. Like I said, God gave us the free will to freely love him - or not. Idea is, without loving God, who created you, who is your very reason for being, you can't be happy.
Granted on the motives part. On the free will thing I'm still not convinced.
OnlyAmbrose wrote:Here's an interesting thing I'll pose to you.
Assuming there is a God (an assumption we both agree on), where did the idea that a God exists come from? Since everything presumably came from God, this idea clearly must have come from God as well. Would an apathetic God give us the idea that he exists?
I don't know how to answer this. But I do believe that a loving God would be more involved. That's my opinion and I have no way to back it up with facts.