freezie wrote:fireedud wrote:freezie wrote:fireedud wrote:freezie wrote:Nobunaga wrote:... What's with the bears?
...
Ermm..Only 1 bear is important..The rest, somewhat, but beside beeing the best fighters in the books...
Iorek rocks.
actually 2 are: Iorek (he rocks!!) and that other dud he had to fight to get his throne back.
Iofur? He is very shady in the background, and beside fighting Irorek, he doesn't do much, I wouldn't call him important to the story.
He is imporatant, without him taking the throne, Lyra would have never met Iorek.
True, but in that thinking, EVERYTHING becomes important.
Then again, fate made it, because of the prophecy and such..Therefor, they were ment to met. So the character os iofur is less important. Still is, but compared to Iorek, especially if you look at the trilogy as a whole.
A virus kills and mutanates everyone on the planet...excepy him because he is immune to the virus.soundout9 wrote:0ojakeo0 wrote:i am legend
I wanna see that....dont get how he is the only dude on earth though
riggable wrote:WHAT A HORRIBLE MOVIE!
God, I grew up to that trilogy of books. I read each of them 3 or 4 times, loving every minute of it. In many ways these books meant more to me than either Chronicles of narnia or harry potter or lord of the rings.
AND THE DIRECTOR RUINED ALL OF IT.
pretty good actors, they were cast very well(except Lyra was a bit too annoying and bratty) and of course a widly imaginative plot. Along with great special effects and you'd assume this be a 4 out of 4 movie, hmm.
and, yet, somehow the director made all this into 100 minutes of pure bullshit. By the end of the movie, the jam-packed theatre I was in was positively screaming and booing about how horrible the movie was. The ending was by far the worst part, I won't give too much away, but its terribly horrible and cliche.
Anyone who says this movie was good has a bad taste in movies and should be disregarded immediatly.
f*ck!..
riggable wrote:Gilligan wrote:It was good. I saw it on the 1st of December.
you have a bad taste in movies, if you think this movie was good.
Gilligan wrote:riggable wrote:Gilligan wrote:It was good. I saw it on the 1st of December.
you have a bad taste in movies, if you think this movie was good.
Everyone is different. I'm sure I may think you have a bad taste of movies at some point as well.
Noooo, I doubt even riggable would say that the Golden Compass was as bad as Eragon. That movie was soooo bad. Even if you don't compare it to the book, which was amazing.By the sounds of it (from riggable), it sounds alot like Eragon. Great book, botched the movie horribly. Then again, relatively few book-based movies turn out well. The LOTR series was good (if lengthy), and Harry Potter films are slright (though the main stars look almost to old for their parts).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users