Dangerous American aircraft blacklisted globally

[jimboston]

static’s

typo shaming is below you

I'm not sure that one counts as a typo.

What would you call it then... just a mistake?

I call it a typo because it’s obvious what I meant to type.

'My meaning was obvious' will be your epitaph.

Either that... or you’re just not s funny and clever as you think you are.

Just because I can’t spell (or more likely my fingers slip on this iPad)... doesn’t mean I’m bad at s-t-a-t-i-s-t-i-c-s.

[mrswdk]

Teachers from the schools afflicted by a dodgy American airline's decision to spray toxic Boeing jet fuel onto the heads of (consequently injured) innocent school children have launched legal action against the airline, citing the airline's illegal fuel dumping practices that the pilots lied to air traffic control about:

Four teachers are suing Delta Air Lines after one of its aircraft dumped fuel over schools as it made an emergency landing.

Delta confirmed the plane had dumped the fuel to reduce its landing weight. Nearly 60 people were treated at six local schools, many of them children.

According to the Los Angeles Times, the suit says jet fuel is dangerous to humans and cites the US Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Aviation rules say that planes can dump fuel in emergency landings, but only over designated areas and at a high altitude.

On Wednesday, the FAA said the crew had released the fuel without telling air traffic control.

A transcript of radio transmissions made public after the incident revealed that the pilot had initially told controllers there was no need to dump, before later releasing the fuel.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-51162248

[jusplay4fun]

You again missed the point, Goranz: You spread the False Narrative.

Get the points and stop scoring ZERO with your poor posts. Try for a layup and not a slam dunk; so far, you have not gotten ANY points.

JP4Fun

[jusplay4fun]

Stats are stats and that does not dismiss the Truth, as much as you would prefer instead to Portray a False Narrative. Again, you miss the POINT and are SHUT OUT. You lose because you miss ALL the points and because you score NOTHING. GAME OVER.

Jim, if you read the several threads in this Off-Topics Forum, you will see that Goranz has been spouting anti-Boeing and anti-American comments for sometime. He will to try to make America, and Boeing, as an "extension" of the USA of America, look BAD any chance he gets.

Boeing f*uck up big time, FAA also f*uck up as well, and you are offended when we talk against them? Maybe you should direct your anger to them and not towards us.
What is worth I believe that FAA will not let Boeing get away with faulty technology again so we might not see another 737 MAX in the skies

The 3,065 fatalities onboard the Tupolev Tu-154 are more than any of the 47 aircraft models Quartz analyzed.

Tu-154 is over half a century old plane, 737 MAX was promoted as new! Please compare 737 MAX with its contemporary rivals

[riskllama]

would you fly on a 737 MAX, jusplay?

[jusplay4fun]

can't; they are all grounded.

I will once they are approved for flying. The SCRUTINY and attention they will undergo to be certified to fly again will be incredible and will be NEEDED to re-assure the public of their safety. As I already admitted, it now appears that Boeing "cut many corners" to hurry the airplane for sale. Many mistakes were made and e-mail released by Boeing demonstrate that beyond any real doubt. Firing the CEO was a step in the right direction, to get Boeing on a correction path.

What about you, Llama? would YOU??

JP4Fun

would you fly on a 737 MAX, jusplay?

[jusplay4fun]

Again, an attempt to blame ALL mistakes on Boeing builds BUT does not fly the aircraft for commercial usage by airlines. the airline companies do. That plane was owned and operated by Delta Airlines. And again, the SKY is NOT falling, as NO one was hospitalized or killed. FALSE NARRATIVE strikes OUT again. Poor attempt to paint an incorrect and inaccurate picture.

So put away your umbrellas; airplanes do not drop fuel on citizens as a normal course of action. AND, a pilot error was likely made, BUT 1)no one died or even serious injured, and 2) IT WAS AN EMERGENCY situation where an engine, likely built BY GE Corp., NOT by Boeing, that failed and caused the emergency. A link below, lists the 4 likely engine makers for the 777 airplane.

FALSE NARRATIVE, once again. Get the FACTS correct before posting, please.

https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/16036/do-all-b777-family-aircraft-have-the-same-engines

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-01-14/tracking-delta-flight-89s-path-before-it-dumped-fuel-on-an-elementary-school

Teachers from the schools afflicted by a dodgy American airline's decision to spray toxic Boeing jet fuel onto the heads of (consequently injured) innocent school children have launched legal action against the airline, citing the airline's illegal fuel dumping practices that the pilots lied to air traffic control about:

Four teachers are suing Delta Air Lines after one of its aircraft dumped fuel over schools as it made an emergency landing.

Delta confirmed the plane had dumped the fuel to reduce its landing weight. Nearly 60 people were treated at six local schools, many of them children.

According to the Los Angeles Times, the suit says jet fuel is dangerous to humans and cites the US Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Aviation rules say that planes can dump fuel in emergency landings, but only over designated areas and at a high altitude.

On Wednesday, the FAA said the crew had released the fuel without telling air traffic control.

A transcript of radio transmissions made public after the incident revealed that the pilot had initially told controllers there was no need to dump, before later releasing the fuel.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-51162248

[riskllama]

can't; they are all grounded.

I will once they are approved for flying. The SCRUTINY and attention they will undergo to be certified to fly again will be incredible and will be NEEDED to re-assure the public of their safety. As I already admitted, it now appears that Boeing "cut many corners" to hurry the airplane for sale. Many mistakes were made and e-mail released by Boeing demonstrate that beyond any real doubt. Firing the CEO was a step in the right direction, to get Boeing on a correction path.

What about you, Llama? would YOU??

JP4Fun

would you fly on a 737 MAX, jusplay?

no, i would not.

[jusplay4fun]

When was the last time you flew on a commercial airplane, Llama?

I flew to Europe this summer on an Airbus (320, as I best recall) and Boeing on the return trip. I cannot recall the exact model for the return from London, but it was not the 737, as they are not intended for overseas trips. The grounding of 737 had already occurred by the time I flew in the summer.

JP4Fun

can't; they are all grounded.

I will once they are approved for flying. The SCRUTINY and attention they will undergo to be certified to fly again will be incredible and will be NEEDED to re-assure the public of their safety. As I already admitted, it now appears that Boeing "cut many corners" to hurry the airplane for sale. Many mistakes were made and e-mail released by Boeing demonstrate that beyond any real doubt. Firing the CEO was a step in the right direction, to get Boeing on a correction path.

What about you, Llama? would YOU??

JP4Fun

would you fly on a 737 MAX, jusplay?

no, i would not.

[riskllama]

that's really none of your business, now is it?

[Dukasaur]

that's really none of your business, now is it?

Riskllama... discovering new types of rudeness since 1952....

[Dukasaur]

The commercial airliner I've spent the most time on is the Ilyushin-62. There's never been a fatal accident with an Il-62.

[HitRed]

After the Boeing 737 it was the TU-134. The nose was like a bomber though it was commercial plane. See photo. I was told it was Soviet Air Force reserve.

[jusplay4fun]

Duk wins this Thread...! Major points on his last two posts here...LoL...!

JP4Fun

[mrswdk]

And again, the SKY is NOT falling, as NO one was hospitalized or killed.

That’s the second time one of this thread’s CIA Incident Containment Bots has tried to play this incident down by saying no one was hospitalised. It’s okay, guys, the dozens of children sprayed with jet fuel during recess only received minor injuries!

What a sad reflection on the state of present day America.

[jusplay4fun]

And I am sure the MILLIONS starved to death by Mao is also minimized as the "Maoist Bot" tries to "play this incident down."

Both these incidents are about the same level of concern, right?

AND you want to criticize the USA? You are an idiot; you are also a hypocrite. Keep on Leaping Forward, Maoist Frog Bot.

JP4Fun

The Great Leap Forward of the People's Republic of China (PRC) was an economic and social campaign by the Communist Party of China (CPC) from 1958 to 1962. Chairman Mao Zedong launched the campaign to transform the country from an agrarian economy into a communist society through the formation of People's communes. Mao decreed increased effort to multiply grain yields and industry should be brought to the countryside. Local officials were fearful of Anti-Rightist Campaigns and competed to fulfill or over-fulfill quotas based on Mao's exaggerated claims. They collected "surpluses" that in fact did not exist, leaving farmers to starve. Higher officials did not dare to report the economic disaster caused by these policies, and national officials blamed bad weather for the decline in food output and took little or no action. The Great Leap resulted in tens of millions of deaths.[1] A lower-end estimate is 18 million and upper estimates find that some 45 million people died.[2] About the same number of births were lost or postponed, making the Great Chinese Famine the largest in human history.[3]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Leap_Forward

And again, the SKY is NOT falling, as NO one was hospitalized or killed.

That’s the second time one of this thread’s CIA Incident Containment Bots has tried to play this incident down by saying no one was hospitalised. It’s okay, guys, the dozens of children sprayed with jet fuel during recess only received minor injuries!

What a sad reflection on the state of present day America.

[KoolBak]

Yeah, I get gas, turpentine, acetone, etc on me all the time. I'd appreciate some consideration since you're so worried about Americans with dangerous liquids on them. Maybe a check....or a nice eulogy.....some parquetry chopstix would be cool.

I'm waiting Mr. China Little.

Oh, and I believe I was included in being a cia operative? I wonder where my fucking backpay is?

[jimboston]

And again, the SKY is NOT falling, as NO one was hospitalized or killed.

That’s the second time one of this thread’s CIA Incident Containment Bots has tried to play this incident down by saying no one was hospitalised. It’s okay, guys, the dozens of children sprayed with jet fuel during recess only received minor injuries!

What a sad reflection on the state of present day America.

Isn’t that what the news report stated?

Are you claiming the American Media is also controlled by the CIA?

[mrswdk]

And again, the SKY is NOT falling, as NO one was hospitalized or killed.

That’s the second time one of this thread’s CIA Incident Containment Bots has tried to play this incident down by saying no one was hospitalised. It’s okay, guys, the dozens of children sprayed with jet fuel during recess only received minor injuries!

What a sad reflection on the state of present day America.

Isn’t that what the news report stated?

How do you not get this? No one in this thread has ever claimed people were hospitalised by this incident. My point is that 'no one was hospitalised' is a weird line of defence.

Next you'll be looking into the teachers who reported the incident trying to find out if any of them have connections to Russia.

[2dimes]

It's nice to see you to pretend to care about those little ketchup eating American kids.

[mrswdk]

Everyone eats ketchup, 2d.

[GoranZ]

they tried to sell old and faulty technology presenting it as top quality and brand new,

That's comedy gold and pretty much the polar opposite of the 737 Max.

How a 50-year-old design came back to haunt Boeing with its troubled 737 Max jet
Seems that you are slaughtered by your own Los Angeles Times

You again missed the point, Goranz: You spread the False Narrative.

Can anyone see 737 max in the sky? NO
Can everyone see 737 max rotting on Boeing parking lot? YES

And you are accusing me of false narrative? Pff, you are the one spreading the false narrative, you are the one that is spreading lies not me.

[GoranZ]

Stats are stats and that does not dismiss the Truth

So now you are dismissing stats because you don't like what they reveal?
Thanks for confirming that you prefer the lies instead of the truth.

You lose because you miss ALL the points and because you score NOTHING. GAME OVER.

I lose? You sure? If you didn't know 737 MAX is not flying, and there is no information if it will be allowed to fly again.
So you are eater DUMBEST CC CUSTOMER, you like the LIES or both.

[Dukasaur]

Oh, and I believe I was included in being a cia operative? I wonder where my fucking backpay is?

It was deposited to your secret Swiss account. You don't know about this account? That's because it's secret!

[Dukasaur]

Would anyone get their nose out of joint if I merged the two airliner threads? It does seem the same things are being said in both of them.