Moderator: Community Team
Machiavelli wrote:
IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE SK TO WIN!!!
everywhere116 wrote:First off, I have no idea where you guys are getting that I am scum.CBlake, if you are a cop, I have four ways that I could have turned up guilty.1. I am a miller and I don't know it (this is possible; look on mafiascum.com.)
2. You are insane/paranoid.
3. I was framed.
4. You are a mafia cop and are lying.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
HoussamTheGreat wrote:Machiavelli wrote:
IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE SK TO WIN!!!
Deep breath sweetie. Once again, there is no reason why the serial killer necessarily have to be the last one standing - the mod can make up any rule he wants! For all I care, the win condition for the serial killer could be to make a kill every night but never to kill mafia! It is A LOT more logical to suspect a SK or Vig to explain away 2 kills in one night (especially since it is OBVIOUS by now we have only one mafia) than to rule out the possibility of a SK based on the win condition.
Having said that, let's see where we are: the only confirmed townies (in my opinion anyways) are you, Fircoal, and myself. And if we accept you to be a townie, then CBlake must be the cop - right?
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Fircoal wrote:7. Traitor and lying.
If he was a traitor he could do this to get rid of a townie then get rid of himself, resulting in 4 down for the mafia to pull out an easier win.
HoussamTheGreat wrote:Fircoal wrote:7. Traitor and lying.
If he was a traitor he could do this to get rid of a townie then get rid of himself, resulting in 4 down for the mafia to pull out an easier win.
what's the win condition for a traitor typically?
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Fircoal wrote:
For the mafia to win.
HoussamTheGreat wrote:Fircoal wrote:
For the mafia to win.
then at this pace all he needed to do was to keep quiet.. he had no need to make a false claim.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Fircoal wrote:HoussamTheGreat wrote:Fircoal wrote:
But say we hit scum, he'd need to get the attention off of the scum.
HoussamTheGreat wrote:Mach.. if you are right in the other game, then I can't be 100% sure of fircoal in this game. do you know what I am saying?
Let me be very clear - I don't think he acted suspicious at all - I am sayiing I was operating under an assupmtion, which if you turn out to be right over there, would be a wrong assumption. you with me?
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
HoussamTheGreat wrote:Mach.. if you are right in the other game, then I can't be 100% sure of fircoal in this game. do you know what I am saying?
Let me be very clear - I don't think he acted suspicious at all - I am sayiing I was operating under an assupmtion, which if you turn out to be right over there, would be a wrong assumption. you with me?
Master Bush wrote:Vote Count
- [2] everywhere116 -- (CBlake, Mach)
- [1] senfive -- (fircoal)
- [1] *houssam -- (geegel)
- [1] No Lynch -- (chessplaya)
- [7] Not Voted -- (Everyone else)
7 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch
Geegel, you voted 3 times in this day, and not once did you unvote. You must unvote in order to change it. So as of right now, your vote is for Houssam.
Senfive wrote:Master Bush wrote:Vote Count
- [2] everywhere116 -- (CBlake, Mach)
- [1] senfive -- (fircoal)
- [1] *houssam -- (geegel)
- [1] No Lynch -- (chessplaya)
- [7] Not Voted -- (Everyone else)
7 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch
Geegel, you voted 3 times in this day, and not once did you unvote. You must unvote in order to change it. So as of right now, your vote is for Houssam.
fircoal you really voted for me. Ha. I can't take back what I did. I am truely sorry. Like I said earlier He didn't help himself at all by lurking and changing his vote without any explination then he came out only when he had a ton of votes on his head. that was a dumb noob townie acting scum like for no reason. I am sorry if I happen to pick up on who is noob in this game.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Master Bush wrote:Vote Count
- [3] everywhere116 -- (CBlake, Mach, Geegel)
- [1] CBlake -- (fircoal)
- [1] No Lynch -- (chessplaya)
- [7] Not Voted -- (Everyone else)
7 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch
Sorry Fircoal, I got confused, because some people were voting and then not unvoting before changing their vote, including you.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Users browsing this forum: DirtyDishSoap