young earth Creationism .. again

by **Lionz** on Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:09 am

What if you were to give unicycles and bicycles and 2-wheel motorcycles and 3-wheel motorcycles and sports cars and pickup trucks and mac trucks intelligence and an ability to reproduce a variety with others of their kind and then they were sent to live on a planet for 6,000 years and bring forth variety? There might end up being theories having to do with common descent from unicycles.

What do you mean I can't get away from evolving because if the difference between species 1 and 2 is x then He first made species 1 and then tweaked the system by x to create species 2, if you claim that? What if speciation occurs and yet He also chose to work off of previous designs to create new ones? What if there are some similarities that are the result of common ancestry and there are some similarities that are the result of design by a common designer and there are some similarities that are the result of both? Can you elaborate on the last four sentences or whatever?

by **PLAYER57832** on Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:26 am

Lionz wrote:What if you were to give unicycles and bicycles and 2-wheel motorcycles and 3-wheel motorcycles and sports cars and pickup trucks and mac trucks intelligence and an ability to reproduce a variety with others of their kind and then they were sent to live on a planet for 6,000 years and bring forth variety? There might end up being theories having to do with common descent from unicycles.

What do you mean I can't get away from evolving because if the difference between species 1 and 2 is x then He first made species 1 and then tweaked the system by x to create species 2, if you claim that? What if speciation occurs and yet He also chose to work off of previous designs to create new ones? What if there are some similarities that are the result of common ancestry and there are some similarities that are the result of design by a common designer and there are some similarities that are the result of both? Can you elaborate on the last four sentences or whatever?

Anything is possible. The question is what did happen. Claiming that evolution, (in the broad sense of decendents of one species becoming another species, which, in turn, gives rise to descendents that eventually form another species... etc.) did not did not happen requires ignoring the evidence.

All your examples show is that you continue to ignore the evidence for evolution.

Disputing evidence is one thing. Ignoring it or claiming that it reveals something other than it really reveals because you cannnot be bothered or simply don't wish to look at the real explanations is something else entirely. The first, dispute, is legitimate. The second, ignoring real evidence is what young earth creationist websites do and what you have continued to do in these various threads.