Night Strike wrote:Woodruff wrote:Night Strike wrote:To think that people who pay a large amount of their income for their own benefits must now also pitch in so government employees have to pay far less for their benefits is disgusting. It's wealth redistribution and political payoffs at its worst.
But why doesn't that logic apply to corporation leadership?
Because corporations have earned their money. Unions require membership (in 28 states) and force those members to pay dues, regardless of their political beliefs. Unions take money from their members while corporations earn their money.
A union does not FORCE those members to pay dues. The member pays those dues because they accepted the position that was part of a union and understood that those dues were a part of the position. It may seem like a non-difference to you, but it is actually a HUGE difference.
So you believe that because a corporation has "earned their money", it's ok for them to engage in political payoffs and bribery? Your hypocricy is astounding.