Conquer Club

Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose? (OWS vs. Nativity)

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

O.W.S.

 
Total votes : 0

Re: Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose?

Postby 2dimes on Wed Oct 26, 2011 11:27 pm

Symmetry wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
Lootifer wrote:Er greed is the fundamental incentive base for the Free Market.

You can call it a different name to make it taste better for all I care, but if people don't want more (money/power/whatever) then there's no reason to compete and the model topples over...




If you are selling cups of lemonade for $1 and then I move onto your street and stat selling it for .50 / cup guess who has to lower his prices or go out of business? :-k


Or then there's the Calvin and Hobbe's summary of what OWS are pissed off about:

Image
I'm stealing that and cross posting it.
User avatar
Corporal 2dimes
 
Posts: 13082
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Re: Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose?

Postby BigBallinStalin on Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:21 am

Lootifer wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
Lootifer wrote:*....must not condescend....*

*....arrrrghhhhh....*

*....deep breath....*

Ok, my question is then: Why would you move in and start selling lemonade?




Because I just got laid off, my car is about to be repossessed, my wife needs a kidney transplant, my house is going into foreclosure and my dog has fleas. So..... I need the money.

:roll:


The correct answer is: BECAUSE I'M A GREEDY CAPITALIST!!

CHA_CHING! CHA_CHING! CHA_CHING! WOOOOOOO, BUDDY!


Image




Isn't the term "greed" a bit misleading? Too much of a negative connotation because it implies that profit-seekers are all motivated by pure self-interest. Is it truly greedy to strive toward earning more money in order to provide more opportunities for your kids? Or to pay off school loans? Or secure more money from donors?
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose?

Postby natty dread on Thu Oct 27, 2011 4:48 am

BigBallinStalin wrote:Isn't the term "greed" a bit misleading? Too much of a negative connotation because it implies that profit-seekers are all motivated by pure self-interest. Is it truly greedy to strive toward earning more money in order to provide more opportunities for your kids? Or to pay off school loans? Or secure more money from donors?


How much money do you need for your kids? Sure, you can justify wanting to give your kids a decent home, food, education etc. but at what point is the excess just... well, excess?
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class natty dread
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked

Re: Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose?

Postby AAFitz on Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:16 am

natty_dread wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Isn't the term "greed" a bit misleading? Too much of a negative connotation because it implies that profit-seekers are all motivated by pure self-interest. Is it truly greedy to strive toward earning more money in order to provide more opportunities for your kids? Or to pay off school loans? Or secure more money from donors?


How much money do you need for your kids? Sure, you can justify wanting to give your kids a decent home, food, education etc. but at what point is the excess just... well, excess?


Greed is a misleading term. "Greed isgood" as Gecko said. Even excess is good, because without it, wed all be living in bushes and caves. There is no such thing as excess, because when you define that, you restrict freedom which is simply insane. Its also completely subjective in every way imaginable.

Greed is bad however, when it results in breaking laws and rules or corrupting the entire political system. That is the type of greed that people refer to even subconsciously when they use the term, or should. It is the greed that inspires illegal acts, illegal pollution, and corruption. The greed that results in illegal acts, illegal pollution and corruption. It is that greed that must be punished accordingly and is so frequently ignored, which enables more greedy acts of corruption to flourish.

Never punish greed, only punish unlawful acts. That is why we have set up the legal system, and actually enforcing it, instead of allowing the greedy to get away with actual crimes against it, which is the real problem. If greedy lawbreakers are held accountable for their actions, they will be no less greedy, but they will most likely be more law abiding, and we have plenty of laws that could have protected us against this crisis, had they been adhered to, and regulated.

The people that are to blame on wall street are not hard working people that happen to make lots of money. They are just ordinary people doing what everyone does and should be praised for their hard work. Actually, they should be in the streets with the rest of the people who are fed up with the real problem that contributed greatly to this crisis which was outright fraud.

If a doctor suggests you use his medication and earns a profit from that, when he knows it is toxic, and will cause harm, he is guilty of fraud. If a wall street firm suggested their clients they buy an asset, and knew it was toxic, they made billions of dollars, but is just as guilty of fraud.

Now, if the doctor truly believes that medication was good, that certainly is not fraud, unless he was telling his family and friends to stay away from it at all costs because it was toxic, clearly it was. That is what companies in wall street did. They told some clients to buy, based on their recommendation as experts, and told all close to them to avoid them. That is fraud. Its punishable by law, and if even dozens were charged and penalized, it could have helped reduce the amount in the future, but instead, the "crisis" made an environment where people were too afraid, and perhaps rightfully so to start throwing greedy lawbreakers into prison, especially since they were the ones crafty enough to take all the money first. So instead, all sins were forgiven, and our country was held ransom and we paid it, and again, perhaps rightfully so.

However, no the dust has settled and people understand exactly what happened and they are mad. Some dont fully understand the situation and think all rich people are the problem, but the majority very much have a real complaint, and they have the courage to stand up for that complaint, and are no doubt, trying to make the world, if not the planet a better place. History may very well call them heros. They may also call them quacks, but history is simply written by the winners so it in many ways is irrelevant.

To condemn a public meeting of Americans is Unamerican. It is the one, if not only power we have. Freedom of speech. I have no idea if they are correct, but I support, and admire their courage to voice their opinion.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: Occupy Wall Street vs Tea Party

Postby General Brock II on Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:55 am

Lootifer wrote:I think (even though we know most of OWS is little rich kids) that it is the other side of the equation: TP is rich looking down (so to speak) compared to the OWS which is the poor looking up (even if its vocal chords are rich mummas boys trying to save the world).


Lootifer, did you ever nail it. I was scrolling through some photographs provided by the media, and at least half are well dressed college kids with designer shades, hightop shoes and a fat wallet (or purse). I don't see what they want - they want the 1% to give to them, but they aren't about to give, are they?

They don't even have clear purpose or goals... Seems like "distribution of the wealth," anarchy and "oh, them fat capitalists" are the main movements, here. It's pointless. Do they suggest any feasible remedies to run a world of over 3 billion people? It isn't just a local movement. People in Europe, Canada, Asia are all protesting under this so called "OWS".
Image

"Atlantis: Fabled. Mystical. Golden. Mysterious. Glorious and magical. There are those who claim that it never was. But then there are also those who think they are safe in this modern world of technology and weapons." ~ Kenyon
User avatar
Major General Brock II
 
Posts: 615
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 4:15 pm
Location: Tactical HQ Caravan, On Campaign

Re: Occupy Wall Street vs Tea Party

Postby AndyDufresne on Thu Oct 27, 2011 9:20 am

General Brock II wrote:
Lootifer wrote:I think (even though we know most of OWS is little rich kids) that it is the other side of the equation: TP is rich looking down (so to speak) compared to the OWS which is the poor looking up (even if its vocal chords are rich mummas boys trying to save the world).


Lootifer, did you ever nail it. I was scrolling through some photographs provided by the media, and at least half are well dressed college kids with designer shades, hightop shoes and a fat wallet (or purse). I don't see what they want - they want the 1% to give to them, but they aren't about to give, are they?

They don't even have clear purpose or goals... Seems like "distribution of the wealth," anarchy and "oh, them fat capitalists" are the main movements, here. It's pointless. Do they suggest any feasible remedies to run a world of over 3 billion people? It isn't just a local movement. People in Europe, Canada, Asia are all protesting under this so called "OWS".


A friend of mine that lives in NYC said that he and some of his friends have liked to hang out down in the protest area because it is a giant hook-up spot.

He also said there are indeed some rich kids, but I think he said there are probably even more regular-income folks. He also said that recently a lot of drug addicts and homeless folks have been coming out because of the food, clothing, and shelter that has been given out, and they seem to just want those amenities, and I don't blame 'em!


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Re: Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose?

Postby jay_a2j on Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:50 am

natty_dread wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Isn't the term "greed" a bit misleading? Too much of a negative connotation because it implies that profit-seekers are all motivated by pure self-interest. Is it truly greedy to strive toward earning more money in order to provide more opportunities for your kids? Or to pay off school loans? Or secure more money from donors?


How much money do you need for your kids? Sure, you can justify wanting to give your kids a decent home, food, education etc. but at what point is the excess just... well, excess?




Yeah cause a lot of people on welfare have a PS3, the latest iphone, ipod and eat better that the average joe. AND we paid for it all! =D>
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Lieutenant jay_a2j
 
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Re: Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose?

Postby AndyDufresne on Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:20 pm

jay_a2j wrote:
natty_dread wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Isn't the term "greed" a bit misleading? Too much of a negative connotation because it implies that profit-seekers are all motivated by pure self-interest. Is it truly greedy to strive toward earning more money in order to provide more opportunities for your kids? Or to pay off school loans? Or secure more money from donors?


How much money do you need for your kids? Sure, you can justify wanting to give your kids a decent home, food, education etc. but at what point is the excess just... well, excess?




Yeah cause a lot of people on welfare have a PS3, the latest iphone, ipod and eat better that the average joe. AND we paid for it all! =D>

How many people do you know on welfare?


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Re: Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose?

Postby keiths31 on Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:40 pm

Yeah cause a lot of people on welfare have a PS3, the latest iphone, ipod and eat better that the average joe. AND we paid for it all! =D>

AndyDufresne wrote:How many people do you know on welfare?


--Andy


I'm not in this debate...but my ex-sister-in-laws are. Both of them and their kids have PS3s, Xbox 360s, designer clothes and want for nothing. Their housing and utilities are also paid for. I don't associate with them anymore, but when I did I wasn't sure how they did it.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class keiths31
 
Posts: 2202
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 6:41 pm
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario

Re: Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose?

Postby natty dread on Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:05 pm

jay_a2j wrote:
natty_dread wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Isn't the term "greed" a bit misleading? Too much of a negative connotation because it implies that profit-seekers are all motivated by pure self-interest. Is it truly greedy to strive toward earning more money in order to provide more opportunities for your kids? Or to pay off school loans? Or secure more money from donors?


How much money do you need for your kids? Sure, you can justify wanting to give your kids a decent home, food, education etc. but at what point is the excess just... well, excess?




Yeah cause a lot of people on welfare have a PS3, the latest iphone, ipod and eat better that the average joe. AND we paid for it all! =D>


[citation needed]
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class natty dread
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked

Re: Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose?

Postby General Brock II on Thu Oct 27, 2011 3:19 pm

AndyDufresne wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
natty_dread wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Isn't the term "greed" a bit misleading? Too much of a negative connotation because it implies that profit-seekers are all motivated by pure self-interest. Is it truly greedy to strive toward earning more money in order to provide more opportunities for your kids? Or to pay off school loans? Or secure more money from donors?


How much money do you need for your kids? Sure, you can justify wanting to give your kids a decent home, food, education etc. but at what point is the excess just... well, excess?




Yeah cause a lot of people on welfare have a PS3, the latest iphone, ipod and eat better that the average joe. AND we paid for it all! =D>

How many people do you know on welfare?


--Andy


I know a few people on welfare. My ex-aunt (lived on welfare for the past twelve years) just purchased a Chevy Avalanche... I only see vehicles like that on the car lot. :P Or at the funeral home...

I have no doubt that the movement attracts those with ulterior motives, and their were certainly many out there who hadn't a job (how else could they camp for days in a park?), and there were some of average income... but not many. As I asked before, what's their goal?
Image

"Atlantis: Fabled. Mystical. Golden. Mysterious. Glorious and magical. There are those who claim that it never was. But then there are also those who think they are safe in this modern world of technology and weapons." ~ Kenyon
User avatar
Major General Brock II
 
Posts: 615
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 4:15 pm
Location: Tactical HQ Caravan, On Campaign

Re: Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose?

Postby Lootifer on Thu Oct 27, 2011 3:28 pm

BigBallinStalin wrote:Isn't the term "greed" a bit misleading? Too much of a negative connotation because it implies that profit-seekers are all motivated by pure self-interest. Is it truly greedy to strive toward earning more money in order to provide more opportunities for your kids? Or to pay off school loans? Or secure more money from donors?

Yer bang on. Like I say call it something else if you like. But that self same desire for more at some point turns into a greed like attribute that causes problems.

I've also never been arguing against the self-interest of the working class. But you already know that ;)

I retract my earlier blah blah since the "greed" whatisname referred to was quite specific. Where I was talking about it generally.
User avatar
Lieutenant Lootifer
 
Posts: 1084
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Competing

Re: Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose?

Postby Aradhus on Thu Oct 27, 2011 3:30 pm

jay_a2j wrote:
natty_dread wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Isn't the term "greed" a bit misleading? Too much of a negative connotation because it implies that profit-seekers are all motivated by pure self-interest. Is it truly greedy to strive toward earning more money in order to provide more opportunities for your kids? Or to pay off school loans? Or secure more money from donors?


How much money do you need for your kids? Sure, you can justify wanting to give your kids a decent home, food, education etc. but at what point is the excess just... well, excess?




Yeah cause a lot of people on welfare have a PS3, the latest iphone, ipod and eat better that the average joe. AND we paid for it all! =D>


Wut?! These fuckers on welfare buy things? How dare they.

Anyway, I'm sure if they have ps3s and iphones (I'll just have to take your word that this is the case) it is because they steal them. I mean, they're on welfare, they must be criminals.
User avatar
Major Aradhus
 
Posts: 571
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:14 pm

Re: Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose?

Postby Lootifer on Thu Oct 27, 2011 3:32 pm

jay_a2j wrote:Yeah cause a lot of people on welfare have a PS3, the latest iphone, ipod and eat better that the average joe. AND we paid for it all! =D>

Yup, and every single business (large or small) out there is immoral, exploitive and only in it for personal gain regardless of the costs! Right...?

edit: in case you missed my point: generalisations, in these cases, are beyond retarded. Bad apples are bad apples regardless of where they sit in society; they're also not the norm.
User avatar
Lieutenant Lootifer
 
Posts: 1084
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Competing

Re: Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose?

Postby spurgistan on Thu Oct 27, 2011 5:07 pm

natty_dread wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
natty_dread wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Isn't the term "greed" a bit misleading? Too much of a negative connotation because it implies that profit-seekers are all motivated by pure self-interest. Is it truly greedy to strive toward earning more money in order to provide more opportunities for your kids? Or to pay off school loans? Or secure more money from donors?


How much money do you need for your kids? Sure, you can justify wanting to give your kids a decent home, food, education etc. but at what point is the excess just... well, excess?




Yeah cause a lot of people on welfare have a PS3, the latest iphone, ipod and eat better that the average joe. AND we paid for it all! =D>


[citation needed]


It's jay. He has his own facts. They're better than the "real world."
I work in a food bank. You don't want to eat this shit. I feel almost bad giving it to them, but they got nothing else.
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.


Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
Sergeant spurgistan
 
Posts: 1868
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 11:30 pm

Re: Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose?

Postby AAFitz on Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:16 pm

spurgistan wrote:
natty_dread wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
natty_dread wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Isn't the term "greed" a bit misleading? Too much of a negative connotation because it implies that profit-seekers are all motivated by pure self-interest. Is it truly greedy to strive toward earning more money in order to provide more opportunities for your kids? Or to pay off school loans? Or secure more money from donors?


How much money do you need for your kids? Sure, you can justify wanting to give your kids a decent home, food, education etc. but at what point is the excess just... well, excess?




Yeah cause a lot of people on welfare have a PS3, the latest iphone, ipod and eat better that the average joe. AND we paid for it all! =D>


[citation needed]


It's jay. He has his own facts. They're better than the "real world."
I work in a food bank. You don't want to eat this shit. I feel almost bad giving it to them, but they got nothing else.


I also believe we pay for everything he has too. Damn government workers steal our money.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose?

Postby jay_a2j on Thu Oct 27, 2011 9:54 pm

AAFitz wrote:I also believe we pay for everything he has too. Damn government workers steal our money.



Would you like us to just let all the bad guys go? Why am I wasting my time keeping you and your family safe? Hell, I don't need this abuse! You are right.... we don't do anything but collect a paycheck. There is your solution to this economic downturn, lay off police/correction officers! Maybe I'll just quit.
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Lieutenant jay_a2j
 
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Re: Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose?

Postby Phatscotty on Thu Oct 27, 2011 9:57 pm

Image

Support Occupy! Tea Party are scum!
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose?

Postby Lootifer on Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:00 pm

Phatscotty wrote:Image

Support Occupy! Tea Party are scum!

To quote someone I respect: Sounds delicious, got some sauce?
User avatar
Lieutenant Lootifer
 
Posts: 1084
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Competing

Re: Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose?

Postby spurgistan on Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:55 am

If the government doesn't like it, obviously it's wrong.
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.


Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
Sergeant spurgistan
 
Posts: 1868
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 11:30 pm

Re: Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose?

Postby Army of GOD on Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:58 am

Lootifer wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:Image

Support Occupy! Tea Party are scum!

To quote someone I respect: Sounds delicious, got some sauce?


It was a pic from Facebook, so it lead me to this page: http://www.facebook.com/LiberalsAreHypocrites
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7191
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose?

Postby Baron Von PWN on Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:47 pm

Army of GOD wrote:
Lootifer wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:Image

Support Occupy! Tea Party are scum!

To quote someone I respect: Sounds delicious, got some sauce?


It was a pic from Facebook, so it lead me to this page: http://www.facebook.com/LiberalsAreHypocrites


The willfully ignorant is strong on that page.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Baron Von PWN
 
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 10:05 pm
Location: Capital region ,Canada

Re: Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose?

Postby Phatscotty on Sat Oct 29, 2011 2:44 pm

4 rapes at Occupy Wall Street protests. 4 women's life and privacy and innocene tragically forced into sex against their will.

Deny it all you want, call me all the names you want. Reality is reality, and rape is rape. Ignore it all, ripping on my post will not take back those rapes or over 2,500 arrests or move that 2.4 million in spending from dealing with drug crazed rapists to help feed hungry or homeless people.

You guys have lots of honor though.
Last edited by Phatscotty on Sat Oct 29, 2011 2:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose?

Postby Night Strike on Sat Oct 29, 2011 2:47 pm

Phatscotty wrote:Image

Support Occupy! Tea Party are scum!


Actually, the government made money off Tea Party protests because Tea Partiers actually paid permit fees where those were applicable. In Richmond, VA, the local Tea Party group is suing the government to retrieve their paid fees because the Occupy people are allowed to protest on the same property without paying those fees.
Image
User avatar
Major Night Strike
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:52 pm

Re: Occupy Wall Street: Support or Oppose?

Postby Phatscotty on Sat Oct 29, 2011 2:48 pm

Night Strike wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:Image

Support Occupy! Tea Party are scum!


Actually, the government made money off Tea Party protests because Tea Partiers actually paid permit fees where those were applicable. In Richmond, VA, the local Tea Party group is suing the government to retrieve their paid fees because the Occupy people are allowed to protest on the same property without paying those fees.


Excellent point! Any more ignorance about the rapes from these posters will force me to show facts and arrests in a new thread "RAPE OUTBREAK AT OCCUPY WALL STREET!"

These people are the biggest hypocrites I have ever seen in my life. Action has been and will continue to be taken, especially in Minneapolis. Don't bring your scum up here, as we have plenty of people who are more than willing to clean you up.

Justice will prevail.
Image
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users