Phatscotty wrote:If you need to label me one way or another, just mark me down with whatever you think Ron Paul is
DONE

Moderator: Community Team
Phatscotty wrote:If you need to label me one way or another, just mark me down with whatever you think Ron Paul is
Juan_Bottom wrote:Mostly for privacy.
I'm paying her mortgage and my sister is in college. We're all that's left. My mom is out of work, partially because she's sick. Partially because she lives in an area known as a black hole of job growth. And the mortgage costs me half my monthly earnings, so I can't participate in life a whole lot.
Obamacare is probably her best and only hope.
I need a revolution. =(
Phatscotty wrote: And about privacy, then I would wonder why you even brought your mom into this...
Phatscotty wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:That's PS gift. He's for the Conservatives, but somehow is against them. . . and I never know what card he's going to play. Sometimes I don't even think the card is from the right deck. We're playing Polish Poker and he passes me the old maid. He's unpredictable, mostly. But for the Conservatives.
That is easier to swallow if you could accept that I am an Independent.
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
GreecePwns wrote:An independent who is also actively involved in the GOP primary delegation of Minnesota?
comic boy wrote:I assume he means independent of integrity or truth, that adds up.
GreecePwns wrote:An independent who is also actively involved in the GOP primary delegation of Minnesota?
Woodruff wrote:GreecePwns wrote:An independent who is also actively involved in the GOP primary delegation of Minnesota?
And apparently, being paid to speak by the Tea Party.
Juan_Bottom wrote:
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Juan_Bottom wrote:
john9blue wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:
so i take it you're voting for romney?
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
spurgistan wrote:john9blue wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:
so i take it you're voting for romney?
Why would you want to vote for somebody who's running against his biggest legislative success?
Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff wrote:GreecePwns wrote:An independent who is also actively involved in the GOP primary delegation of Minnesota?
And apparently, being paid to speak by the Tea Party.
The Tea Party is closer to the center than it is the right. For every 10 tea party members, 4 are Republican, 5 are independent or Libertarian, and 1 is a Democrat. But, even after all these years Woodruff, and all your talk about the Tea Party, you still don't accept it for what it is, and have not begun to try to understand either, a lot like trolling.
Juan_Bottom wrote:Hilariously, that notorious flip-flopper Romney has said that he wants to repeal the parts of Obamacare that pay for Obamacare. He'd change it from a revenue-saving program into a deficit program.
Pay attention people. This isn't new and everyone made fun of him for this.
Woodruff wrote:I recognize the Tea Party for what it is. I was a part of the Tea Party when it started out. Then it became absorbed into the right-wing machine, and I lost interest in being a part of it. I still believe the Tea Party could have been a great thing for this nation, but I would suggest to you that trying to play like the Tea Party ISN'T now a part of the right-wing is disengenuous at best, and more likely downright dishonest.
Night Strike wrote:It's not saving any revenue right now anyway, so your argument is disingenuous.
Night Strike wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:Hilariously, that notorious flip-flopper Romney has said that he wants to repeal the parts of Obamacare that pay for Obamacare. He'd change it from a revenue-saving program into a deficit program.
Pay attention people. This isn't new and everyone made fun of him for this.
It's not saving any revenue right now anyway, so your argument is disingenuous.Woodruff wrote:I recognize the Tea Party for what it is. I was a part of the Tea Party when it started out. Then it became absorbed into the right-wing machine, and I lost interest in being a part of it. I still believe the Tea Party could have been a great thing for this nation, but I would suggest to you that trying to play like the Tea Party ISN'T now a part of the right-wing is disengenuous at best, and more likely downright dishonest.
Why wouldn't the Tea Party be right-wing?
Woodruff wrote:The left-wing wants to perpetually grow the federal government into an unsustainable monstrosity.
Woodruff wrote:Heck, we can't even sustain our current spending. It's only conservatives and libertarians who are even trying to reign in the spending. The Tea Party is a crucial part of achieving that goal.
Juan_Bottom wrote:Night Strike wrote:It's not saving any revenue right now anyway, so your argument is disingenuous.
I didn't say that it would save money today. But everyone except the Republican nutters acknowledge that it will save a shit-ton of money for our nation. So your argument is disingenuous. There's no debate about this here.
Woodruff wrote:Night Strike wrote:The left-wing wants to perpetually grow the federal government into an unsustainable monstrosity.
That really isn't true, necessarily. Do you get all of your information from propoganda?
Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff wrote:GreecePwns wrote:An independent who is also actively involved in the GOP primary delegation of Minnesota?
And apparently, being paid to speak by the Tea Party.
The Tea Party is closer to the center than it is the right. For every 10 tea party members, 4 are Republican, 5 are independent or Libertarian, and 1 is a Democrat. But, even after all these years Woodruff, and all your talk about the Tea Party, you still don't accept it for what it is, and have not begun to try to understand either, a lot like trolling.
I recognize the Tea Party for what it is. I was a part of the Tea Party when it started out. Then it became absorbed into the right-wing machine, and I lost interest in being a part of it. I still believe the Tea Party could have been a great thing for this nation, but I would suggest to you that trying to play like the Tea Party ISN'T now a part of the right-wing is disengenuous at best, and more likely downright dishonest.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users