Moderator: Community Team
Night Strike wrote:GreecePwns wrote:If the members really care so much about having their money spent like that, then they should reconsider their membership. If your job forces you to be part of a union, get a new job. Of course finding a job is easier said than done, but thats an argument made by conservatives for those pesky lazy poor people.
There's a huge difference between thinking you deserve to be paid more and having your money taken by a group that you don't agree with simply because you work there. Those unions don't actually pay you, you pay them. Employers pay you, you don't pay them.
Woodruff wrote:Night Strike wrote:GreecePwns wrote:If the members really care so much about having their money spent like that, then they should reconsider their membership. If your job forces you to be part of a union, get a new job. Of course finding a job is easier said than done, but thats an argument made by conservatives for those pesky lazy poor people.
There's a huge difference between thinking you deserve to be paid more and having your money taken by a group that you don't agree with simply because you work there. Those unions don't actually pay you, you pay them. Employers pay you, you don't pay them.
You say that the unions don't pay you, and that's mostly true. Yet the unions DO have a hand in how much you are paid, as well as your benefits. So to pretend that the unions are just taking your money and giving you nothing in return is really...well, not very smart.
You will have to show me evidence of even a single school district that passes out condoms to 8 year olds. Here, not even high schoolers get them in school.
GreecePwns wrote:If the members really care so much about having their money spent like that, then they should reconsider their membership. If your job forces you to be part of a union, get a new job. Of course finding a job is easier said than done, but thats an argument made by conservatives for those pesky lazy poor people.
PopeBenXVI wrote:GreecePwns wrote:If the members really care so much about having their money spent like that, then they should reconsider their membership. If your job forces you to be part of a union, get a new job. Of course finding a job is easier said than done, but thats an argument made by conservatives for those pesky lazy poor people.
Hahahahaha......Ok I'll just go get a new job. I did not realize it would be that easy to do right now.
PopeBenXVI wrote:it looks like $1 out of $5 campaign dollars for the missing 14 Dems comes from Public sector unions. For some of them it's over half. I am sure that has nothing to do with all this. It's all about workers "rights" even though they still would have more bargaining power than all federal employees under Obama as well as most other states public unions.
Phatscotty wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:GreecePwns wrote:Oh, unions donate to democrats? Thanks for that. I didn't know that.
But you can understand why a lot of independents and conservatives in those unions who pay those dues have a problem right?
That's what happens in groups. Not everyone always gets what they want.
sure, but it can, and it is, being fixed. More people can now get what they want.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:GreecePwns wrote:Oh, unions donate to democrats? Thanks for that. I didn't know that.
But you can understand why a lot of independents and conservatives in those unions who pay those dues have a problem right?
That's what happens in groups. Not everyone always gets what they want.
sure, but it can, and it is, being fixed. More people can now get what they want.
In WI? Not according to polls. Of course, the right wing has a long history of claiming it is in the majority when it isn't.
Phatscotty wrote:polls from people about what they think might happen is not the same thing as what will happen.
P.S. WI Republicans have a hardcore majority. Not "claiming" common knowledge
It's the same argument conservatives used against welfare programs. The poor people are too lazy and aren't working hard enough to find a job is what is always said. If that argument can be made, so can mine. Of course it's an absurd one that really can't be made and I said that right there but go ahead and run with it.PopeBenXVI wrote:GreecePwns wrote:If the members really care so much about having their money spent like that, then they should reconsider their membership. If your job forces you to be part of a union, get a new job. Of course finding a job is easier said than done, but thats an argument made by conservatives for those pesky lazy poor people.
Hahahahaha......Ok I'll just go get a new job. I did not realize it would be that easy to do right now.
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:polls from people about what they think might happen is not the same thing as what will happen.
P.S. WI Republicans have a hardcore majority. Not "claiming" common knowledge
Having won a majority in the last election does not mean the majority agree with every action that party decides to implement.
PopeBenXVI wrote:I will actually side with Juan on this topic. Their are WAY too many things that are labeled as a "felony" and the main purpose of it in my book is to take away our gun rights as individuals. Whatever your belief on the reason for so many little things being a felony is less important but it takes away too many of our rights any way you look at it.
thegreekdog wrote:Juan - your definition of right does not apply to any of the rights that I think we have in the US. For example, arguably we have the right to life, but that can be taken away by anyone including the government (whether directly or indirectly).
I think maybe what you mean is that a right is something guaranteed in the Constitution. But I don't want to put words in your mouth, especially since collective bargaining is not a right guaranteed by the Constitution. If Congress repealed the National Labor Relations Act, there would be no more unions.
Phatscotty wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:polls from people about what they think might happen is not the same thing as what will happen.
P.S. WI Republicans have a hardcore majority. Not "claiming" common knowledge
Having won a majority in the last election does not mean the majority agree with every action that party decides to implement.
Sure. they can change it democratically in 2012 election. All Walker is doing is exactly what he said he would do in his campaign.
The people have decided. Power to the people.
Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff wrote:Night Strike wrote:GreecePwns wrote:If the members really care so much about having their money spent like that, then they should reconsider their membership. If your job forces you to be part of a union, get a new job. Of course finding a job is easier said than done, but thats an argument made by conservatives for those pesky lazy poor people.
There's a huge difference between thinking you deserve to be paid more and having your money taken by a group that you don't agree with simply because you work there. Those unions don't actually pay you, you pay them. Employers pay you, you don't pay them.
You say that the unions don't pay you, and that's mostly true. Yet the unions DO have a hand in how much you are paid, as well as your benefits. So to pretend that the unions are just taking your money and giving you nothing in return is really...well, not very smart.
yeah but the extra money made, is that more than the union dues you gotta pay?
Phatscotty wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:polls from people about what they think might happen is not the same thing as what will happen.
P.S. WI Republicans have a hardcore majority. Not "claiming" common knowledge
Having won a majority in the last election does not mean the majority agree with every action that party decides to implement.
Sure. they can change it democratically in 2012 election. All Walker is doing is exactly what he said he would do in his campaign.
The people have decided. Power to the people.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:polls from people about what they think might happen is not the same thing as what will happen.
P.S. WI Republicans have a hardcore majority. Not "claiming" common knowledge
Having won a majority in the last election does not mean the majority agree with every action that party decides to implement.
Sure. they can change it democratically in 2012 election. All Walker is doing is exactly what he said he would do in his campaign.
The people have decided. Power to the people.
No, voting someone into office does not mean you suddenly give up your right to a voice and have installed a dictator.
Phatscotty wrote:
Install a dictator? Doesn't that totally ignore the whole "2012 election" thingy?
PopeBenXVI wrote:That was classic!!! I just got a call from aflcio taking a poll. (I asked him who he was with) They gave me their 1 minute lecture and then asked if they could "mark me down" that I agreed Government officials in Wisconsin needed to look out for the worker. What an over generalized question leading into a vary specific answer. Instead of answering their ridiculous question I said "who is looking out for the taxpayers?" He then said excuse me? I then asked the question a second time and then the Union drown hung up! I wonder if he "marked me down" as opposing for their survey.
PLAYER57832 wrote:PopeBenXVI wrote:That was classic!!! I just got a call from aflcio taking a poll. (I asked him who he was with) They gave me their 1 minute lecture and then asked if they could "mark me down" that I agreed Government officials in Wisconsin needed to look out for the worker. What an over generalized question leading into a vary specific answer. Instead of answering their ridiculous question I said "who is looking out for the taxpayers?" He then said excuse me? I then asked the question a second time and then the Union drown hung up! I wonder if he "marked me down" as opposing for their survey.
Not a respectable poll.
Since I am usually registered as a Democrat and my husband a Republican, we tend to get them from both sides.
Gallup, etc do not use those tactics.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:
Install a dictator? Doesn't that totally ignore the whole "2012 election" thingy?
To quote a famouse Wisconsonian:
"Democracy does not happen for just 1 day".
Phatscotty wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:
Install a dictator? Doesn't that totally ignore the whole "2012 election" thingy?
To quote a famouse Wisconsonian:
"Democracy does not happen for just 1 day".
The direction the democracy is going to take is in fact decided in one day.
you really are something
Users browsing this forum: No registered users