by jonesthecurl on Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:32 pm
ANd there's the rub Jay.
I have always been interested in why people of faith believe what they believe. this has caused me to read widely about beliefs, covering a lot of ground that has no live believers.
ON a more personal and immediate level I have engaged in long and deep debates with Christians of various shades (Pentecostalist, spiritualists, Catholics, evangelical, JW's, Baptists, one Moonie [who left and joined the Charismatic church: there's an interesting tale about him I'll relate some time], and many more)
Plus Buddists, Zen buddists (are you a Buddist wihtout a Yen? if not, what Zen?), Jews, Mormons, scientologists, flying-saucer people (forget the name of that one), Musllims both Sunni and Shi'ite, Sufi, Church of Satan, (wait, the flying-saucerians are "Etherians" I think), devotees of Native American cults, followers of Castaneda and his Yaqui philosophy, Learyites, Wiccans and witches, Druids, and I'm sure a few more who escape me momentarily.
These discussions can go on (and have) for weeks, or for hundreds of pages of posts (as here). Some have claimed logic or the obvious inherent nature of things to be on their side, as have you.
But in the end, all any of them can say is "It's true because it's true". As an outsider, the fact that this is equally convincing to the seriously-devoted members of all religions is the most compelling argument that this cannot be enough. Telling me to believe in a book because it says IN THAT BOOK that the book is true would make me a believer in Tarzan, Holmes, and Ayesha.
I f in the end your logic says only "my God is the only God because he's God and he says so", then I admire your faith, but am utterly unable to,even imagine the faintest impulse to join you.
instagram.com/garethjohnjoneswrites