
kidding...okay...umm...
Where's everybody at?
Moderator: Community Team
TitusFinn wrote:jay_a2j wrote: You dening its existence is like Clinton dening he had "sexual relations" with Monica ( and half of the female population of Arkansas).
Or Bush DENYING that he masturbated in a coffin while relating his sexual experiences to his frat brothers. SINNER!
Just ONCE Jay, ONCE I wish you'd stop judging liberals. It's just sickening. And it's hypocritical for a "good" christian, such as yourself, to keep bashing other people.
Besides Jesus was a liberal.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
pilate065 wrote:jay_a2j wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:i'm just goign to say......
what if in the very likely possibility the bible is wrong! This would come off as you not caring about people right?
See, I don't understand how one can claim to be an ordained minister or reverend or rabbi or anything else and one, doubt the existence of God, two make statements like "what if the Bible was wrong?". Men of the cloth USUALLY aren't the one's poking holes in others faith regardless of which faith it is. People who become reverends and such do so because they have FAITH in what religion they are apart of. So you must be a "reverend" of some other religion other than Christianity. For how can you preach the word of God if you don't believe what it says?
As for the Bible being wrong..... many have tried to disprove it and all have failed. I think even Darwin read the Bible to try to disprove it. (Some say he became a Christion on his death bed because of it). So if someone can disprove the Bible I'm all ears.
You mentioned that Russia and China are in the book of Revelations. Of course, that is your interpretation, and it is likely wrong according to most academic experts. American foreign policy should not be based religious texts.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
jay_a2j wrote:TitusFinn wrote:jay_a2j wrote: You dening its existence is like Clinton dening he had "sexual relations" with Monica ( and half of the female population of Arkansas).
Or Bush DENYING that he masturbated in a coffin while relating his sexual experiences to his frat brothers. SINNER!
Just ONCE Jay, ONCE I wish you'd stop judging liberals. It's just sickening. And it's hypocritical for a "good" christian, such as yourself, to keep bashing other people.
Besides Jesus was a liberal.
Jesus was not a liberal at least not TODAY's definition of liberal.
i guessed 650 also. Before Tituts.dagreatbroomhead wrote:#3 the most popular instrument is the ______?(3 points)
#9 who were the characters Bert and Ernie on Sesame Street named after(6)
#10 Mosquitoes have _____ teeth(5)
#11 What did the largest known kidney stone weigh(in kilograms)(3)
#12 The first flushing toilet seen on TV was on what show?(4)
Score leaders
Kingwaffles - 11
Highborn - 5.5
TitusFinn -5.5
*notes* due to the inaccuracy of my freshman since book*i've done some checking, the points have been split between the two people who guesses 650, my bad guys.
and due to the estimation of #2, it has been removed
reverend_kyle wrote:jay_a2j wrote:TitusFinn wrote:jay_a2j wrote: You dening its existence is like Clinton dening he had "sexual relations" with Monica ( and half of the female population of Arkansas).
Or Bush DENYING that he masturbated in a coffin while relating his sexual experiences to his frat brothers. SINNER!
Just ONCE Jay, ONCE I wish you'd stop judging liberals. It's just sickening. And it's hypocritical for a "good" christian, such as yourself, to keep bashing other people.
Besides Jesus was a liberal.
Jesus was not a liberal at least not TODAY's definition of liberal.
Yes he was he was most definatly pro choice....
jesus was pro choice...
how i was taught in my years of education in church was that jesus wanted us to have free will and do what we wanted on earth and he would judge us and decide who went to heaven and hell, as it seems the republicans want to regulate how we are acting super using laws and hurting our free agency. How can this super christian group try and destroy christs principles and go with satans? Plus why would this group want to force people who dont follow what they believe "christs ways" are to go into heaven with them? Aren't the republicans just trying to cheat jesus's system, much like they have cheated every other system? Please reply I'm curious on what other people believe or how they justify this..
He supported separation of church and state....
in matthew 22:21 he says
21They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.
He also basically was a hippie, he had long hair and traveled around the world spreading his beliefs
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
jay_a2j wrote:pilate065 wrote:jay_a2j wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:i'm just goign to say......
what if in the very likely possibility the bible is wrong! This would come off as you not caring about people right?
See, I don't understand how one can claim to be an ordained minister or reverend or rabbi or anything else and one, doubt the existence of God, two make statements like "what if the Bible was wrong?". Men of the cloth USUALLY aren't the one's poking holes in others faith regardless of which faith it is. People who become reverends and such do so because they have FAITH in what religion they are apart of. So you must be a "reverend" of some other religion other than Christianity. For how can you preach the word of God if you don't believe what it says?
As for the Bible being wrong..... many have tried to disprove it and all have failed. I think even Darwin read the Bible to try to disprove it. (Some say he became a Christion on his death bed because of it). So if someone can disprove the Bible I'm all ears.
You mentioned that Russia and China are in the book of Revelations. Of course, that is your interpretation, and it is likely wrong according to most academic experts. American foreign policy should not be based religious texts.
You learn neat things when studing prophecy. Like EVERYTHING is centered around Isreal. Thus the "army of the north" is RUSSIA (see a map). And the " army of the East" is China (see map again) Now scipture says the "army of the East" will move West across the Euphraties(sp) River with 200 million troops killing 1/3 of all people on earth.
Now lets look at that a second. An army of 200 million...ONLY China can muster an army that size. They will move across the Eph. river... this would have been impossible...well, until they built that dam on that river, now making it possible. Killing 1/3 of the words population.... that would be Russia (as mentioned elsewhere in Revelation) and India/Pakistan are densly populated... I think they might fall victim to China. But hey don't take my word for it...you might be able to WATCH it happen (If you live outside the US).
reverend_kyle wrote:
First of all its the DEMOCRATS who want to take away free choice!
1. They want to take away guns from citizens.
2. They want bans on smoking just about everywhere.
3. They are against school vouchers (which would be FREEDOM OF CHOICE)
4. They are anti-God across the board
to respond to your points
According to John Locke's social contract your rights end where my face begins thusly being that if you abuse your rights to hurt others then they arent rights you have..
1. I actually disagree with gun control
2. second hand smoke kills(isnt it you who supports bans on marijuana(liberals support that) oh and you also support prohibition(ban on alcohol since i know you are THAT stupid)
3. I dont know much about school vouchers, so I can't really respond to that...
4. We are anti IMPOSING OUR MORALS ON OTHERS because we respect their FREE AGENCY.
also, that isnt twisting scriptures because he was clearly advocating that.
Republicans are tools of satan
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
pilate065 wrote:jay_a2j wrote:pilate065 wrote:jay_a2j wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:i'm just goign to say......
what if in the very likely possibility the bible is wrong! This would come off as you not caring about people right?
See, I don't understand how one can claim to be an ordained minister or reverend or rabbi or anything else and one, doubt the existence of God, two make statements like "what if the Bible was wrong?". Men of the cloth USUALLY aren't the one's poking holes in others faith regardless of which faith it is. People who become reverends and such do so because they have FAITH in what religion they are apart of. So you must be a "reverend" of some other religion other than Christianity. For how can you preach the word of God if you don't believe what it says?
As for the Bible being wrong..... many have tried to disprove it and all have failed. I think even Darwin read the Bible to try to disprove it. (Some say he became a Christion on his death bed because of it). So if someone can disprove the Bible I'm all ears.
You mentioned that Russia and China are in the book of Revelations. Of course, that is your interpretation, and it is likely wrong according to most academic experts. American foreign policy should not be based religious texts.
You learn neat things when studing prophecy. Like EVERYTHING is centered around Isreal. Thus the "army of the north" is RUSSIA (see a map). And the " army of the East" is China (see map again) Now scipture says the "army of the East" will move West across the Euphraties(sp) River with 200 million troops killing 1/3 of all people on earth.
Now lets look at that a second. An army of 200 million...ONLY China can muster an army that size. They will move across the Eph. river... this would have been impossible...well, until they built that dam on that river, now making it possible. Killing 1/3 of the words population.... that would be Russia (as mentioned elsewhere in Revelation) and India/Pakistan are densly populated... I think they might fall victim to China. But hey don't take my word for it...you might be able to WATCH it happen (If you live outside the US).
So that's where you got the 200 million number. The REAL figures YOU provided was closer to 2 million. What about India? India will overtake China in terms of population size within the next generation. For China, you were so quick to accept that figure, you missed your basic adding mistake. I bet there are lots of other things you missed.
pilate065 wrote:jay_a2j wrote:pilate065 wrote:jay_a2j wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:i'm just goign to say......
what if in the very likely possibility the bible is wrong! This would come off as you not caring about people right?
See, I don't understand how one can claim to be an ordained minister or reverend or rabbi or anything else and one, doubt the existence of God, two make statements like "what if the Bible was wrong?". Men of the cloth USUALLY aren't the one's poking holes in others faith regardless of which faith it is. People who become reverends and such do so because they have FAITH in what religion they are apart of. So you must be a "reverend" of some other religion other than Christianity. For how can you preach the word of God if you don't believe what it says?
As for the Bible being wrong..... many have tried to disprove it and all have failed. I think even Darwin read the Bible to try to disprove it. (Some say he became a Christion on his death bed because of it). So if someone can disprove the Bible I'm all ears.
You mentioned that Russia and China are in the book of Revelations. Of course, that is your interpretation, and it is likely wrong according to most academic experts. American foreign policy should not be based religious texts.
You learn neat things when studing prophecy. Like EVERYTHING is centered around Isreal. Thus the "army of the north" is RUSSIA (see a map). And the " army of the East" is China (see map again) Now scipture says the "army of the East" will move West across the Euphraties(sp) River with 200 million troops killing 1/3 of all people on earth.
Now lets look at that a second. An army of 200 million...ONLY China can muster an army that size. They will move across the Eph. river... this would have been impossible...well, until they built that dam on that river, now making it possible. Killing 1/3 of the words population.... that would be Russia (as mentioned elsewhere in Revelation) and India/Pakistan are densly populated... I think they might fall victim to China. But hey don't take my word for it...you might be able to WATCH it happen (If you live outside the US).
So that's where you got the 200 million number. The REAL figures YOU provided was closer to 2 million. What about India? India will overtake China in terms of population size within the next generation. For China, you were so quick to accept that figure, you missed your basic adding mistake. I bet there are lots of other things you missed.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
jay_a2j wrote:pilate065 wrote:jay_a2j wrote:pilate065 wrote:jay_a2j wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:i'm just goign to say......
what if in the very likely possibility the bible is wrong! This would come off as you not caring about people right?
See, I don't understand how one can claim to be an ordained minister or reverend or rabbi or anything else and one, doubt the existence of God, two make statements like "what if the Bible was wrong?". Men of the cloth USUALLY aren't the one's poking holes in others faith regardless of which faith it is. People who become reverends and such do so because they have FAITH in what religion they are apart of. So you must be a "reverend" of some other religion other than Christianity. For how can you preach the word of God if you don't believe what it says?
As for the Bible being wrong..... many have tried to disprove it and all have failed. I think even Darwin read the Bible to try to disprove it. (Some say he became a Christion on his death bed because of it). So if someone can disprove the Bible I'm all ears.
You mentioned that Russia and China are in the book of Revelations. Of course, that is your interpretation, and it is likely wrong according to most academic experts. American foreign policy should not be based religious texts.
You learn neat things when studing prophecy. Like EVERYTHING is centered around Isreal. Thus the "army of the north" is RUSSIA (see a map). And the " army of the East" is China (see map again) Now scipture says the "army of the East" will move West across the Euphraties(sp) River with 200 million troops killing 1/3 of all people on earth.
Now lets look at that a second. An army of 200 million...ONLY China can muster an army that size. They will move across the Eph. river... this would have been impossible...well, until they built that dam on that river, now making it possible. Killing 1/3 of the words population.... that would be Russia (as mentioned elsewhere in Revelation) and India/Pakistan are densly populated... I think they might fall victim to China. But hey don't take my word for it...you might be able to WATCH it happen (If you live outside the US).
So that's where you got the 200 million number. The REAL figures YOU provided was closer to 2 million. What about India? India will overtake China in terms of population size within the next generation. For China, you were so quick to accept that figure, you missed your basic adding mistake. I bet there are lots of other things you missed.
If China decided to go to war..... they'd get the 200 million. And as far as your theory of INDIA being the "army of the East" They don't have the military technology (that Clinton gave China). And I need to look at a map..... would INDIA need to cross the euphraties river on it way to destroy (try anyway) Isreal? Trust me its China....
It's more of..you arent worth the effort.jay_a2j wrote:. NO, i dont impose morality on everyone else i just dont think its my business if thats the way they choose(as long as they dont hurt anyone)
IMmorality!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! not "morality"
You use the term "I'm lazy" a lot..... you truly must be a democrat...its a trait that many of them posses.
However, this makes no sense from an unbiased, critical, academic perspective.
HighBorn wrote:yeah who you looking for hoots.. your not in my closet again r u ??
Users browsing this forum: DirtyDishSoap