Nephilim

[BigBallinStalin]

I'd like to see some intelligent refutation of the giant skeletons. I've wondered for a number of years now why evolutionary scientists ignore them. As one of the "local rubes" here i'll say that it appears that you have no factual rebuttal at this point, only a case of the red ass concerning the church. I can relate to that as i have a case myself, but i back up my attacks on such. If "everything" he's posted is "sketchy and easily disproven" then you shouldn't have any trouble disproving it.

Again, i'd like to see some intelligent refutation on the giant skeletons.


Honibaz

One looked like it was made of rock, or a sculptor. The other could have been a really big human. WHOA! NEPHILIM SPOTTED!

Your allegation that evolutionary scientists ignore them must be taken at face value for I am not going to spend any time finding out whether or not that's true. I'd assume they've already dealt with this and many have released a public statement in general agreement on whatever their findings may be.

I assure you a quick google search will reveal the answer. Good luck.

[thegreekdog]

Is there an angel who's not alien to earth even if angels are real?

What if individuals have tried to coverup nephilim info and nephilim evidence and more in preparation for deception and there are actually fallen angels who are planning to show up publically in flying crafts during time of disaster and masquerade as benevolent primate evolving aliens? Noticed an increasing amount of alien stuff and dying planet stuff in mainstream media? How many times have you heard mention of the word nephilim in mainstream media?

That does not answer my question. I don't believe in conspiracy theories. I do believe in angels, though that is not relevant to this conversation because there are beliefs not facts.

So, to answer your questions:

(1) I don't believe individuals are covering anything up.
(2) I don't notice an increasing amount of alien stuff or apocalypse stuff in the mainstream media. This stuff has been around at least since television and definitely since Asimov and his ilk.
(3) I have never heard the term "nephilim" in the mainstream media.

[BigBallinStalin]

Is there an angel who's not alien to earth even if angels are real?

What if individuals have tried to coverup nephilim info and nephilim evidence and more in preparation for deception and there are actually fallen angels who are planning to show up publically in flying crafts during time of disaster and masquerade as benevolent primate evolving aliens? Noticed an increasing amount of alien stuff and dying planet stuff in mainstream media? How many times have you heard mention of the word nephilim in mainstream media?

I admire you for not addressing his question while making it seem like you are really trying to. How bout a big follow-up with some more pictures on angels being aliens?

[Lionz]

Why should I assume there are no angels to answer something if I should for some reason?

[thegreekdog]

I really don't like when people get angry about not answering their questions when they don't answer mine.

[Lionz]

Even the word angel can be defined more than one way perhaps, but evidence suggests that beings from the heavens have interacted with mankind and suggests that humans do not share common ancestry with chimpanzees whether or not there are angelic beings created directly by Him maybe... maybe you are technically a descendant of one or more alien if you're a nephil. Who's angry?

[thegreekdog]

Okay, so you're not going to answer. Later dude.

[Lionz]

What do you want me to answer? I might not be the least technical person ever.

Am I claiming you and I are descended from aliens? No. Am I claiming humans in general are? No.

Am I claiming you and I evolved from anyone through a process of RNA transcription error derived mutations? No. Am I claiming humans in general have? No.

Am I claiming you and I are descendants of alien colonists? No. Am I claiming humans in general are? No.

Are you a nephil? Maybe I'm at least suggesting that you're a descendant of one or more alien if you are.

[Johnny Rockets]

Johnny,

What's shown here?



Did men smooth out one or more mountain top thousands of years ago whether runways are shown or not?

I'm not sure if I've walked into a church building ten times and you have false assumptions about me maybe. There are questions for you back on page 2 that you missed?

A leveled or flattened moutain top?

I can see the conversation now:

Greetings Nephilim!

Er.....hi....uh......

whats the problem holy one?

Well.....it's just the parking aound here is horrid. I know we have interstellar and inter dimensional travel capacity, but we REALLY REALLY like to park at high elevation you know?

Oh...well, we'll get some of the guys together and fix something up for you.


JRock

[Lionz]

[Lionz]

Opportunus Adest? Does that basically mean opportune appearance?

I might not be a fan of Notre Dame or Roman Catholicism, but...
http://catholic.archives.nd.edu/cgi-bin ... unus+Adest

[2dimes]

Dude, that's not going to fly.


So is there some place I can check out a giant skeleton in person? I'm pretty interested in seeing one of those.

[Johnny Rockets]

I'd like to see some intelligent refutation of the giant skeletons. I've wondered for a number of years now why evolutionary scientists ignore them. As one of the "local rubes" here i'll say that it appears that you have no factual rebuttal at this point, only a case of the red ass concerning the church. I can relate to that as i have a case myself, but i back up my attacks on such. If "everything" he's posted is "sketchy and easily disproven" then you shouldn't have any trouble disproving it.

Again, i'd like to see some intelligent refutation on the giant skeletons.


Honibaz

Are you serious?


Because the whole topic is like debating what shade of blue is the smurfiest.

It's fucking stupid ok? And to have an intelligent discussion about somthing this is like throwing shit at zoo monkeys. Idiots can prove they are idiots much better than you can.
Inteligient discussion is not needed, and impossible anyway with a religious zealot.


Here......to satisfy your curiosity:

[http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bl_giant_skeleton.htm

And Here:

http://www.hoax-slayer.com/giant-skeleton.html

This is like debating the existance of the tooth fairy.

J

[Lionz]

2dimes,

There are individuals who do not want us to see human skeletons over 10 feet tall maybe.

Johnny,

You referred to sites that address images that had not been posted in here and proceeded to make a boastful comment like they supported you in a debate?

[Lionz]

2dimes,

This includes images that should include more for all I know and I'm not sure what here is a hoax perhaps, but...

[MeDeFe]

Why does the fossil have a healthbar? Is this a videogame maybe?

[Lionz]

Red was added by me over an Arabic logo or at least something like that perhaps.

[Frigidus]

Red was added by me over an Arabic logo or at least something like that perhaps.

You exude confidence.

[Lionz]

What do I know? Maybe gremlins have even came and switched up tinypic addresses of me for all I know. Arabic looking logo or news station name or both?

[Lionz]

See references to Pliny, Josephus, Magellan, Amerigo Vespucci, Sir Francis Drake, Coronado, De Soto, Narvaez and Buffalo Bill here? Use CTRL-F? http://www.stevequayle.com/Giants/artic ... mball.html

[2dimes]

I really want to see at least a skull in giant size. I have to think if there was one it would be pretty big news around here. Remember how all the internet media went nuts when those dudes faked the rotting saskwatch in their deepfreeze a couple years ago?

Because the whole topic is like debating what shade of blue is the smurfiest.

This is like debating the existance of the tooth fairy.

J

New threads please.

[Lionz]

You might want to search Smithsonian nephilim. What if the devil's not make believe or lazy?

[2dimes]

Cut and pasted smithsonian nephlim in google.
Third link,

There were rumours that a Nephilim attacked US soldiers in a remote location in Afghanistan.

[PLAYER57832]

I'd like to see some intelligent refutation of the giant skeletons. I've wondered for a number of years now why evolutionary scientists ignore them. As one of the "local rubes" here i'll say that it appears that you have no factual rebuttal at this point, only a case of the red ass concerning the church. I can relate to that as i have a case myself, but i back up my attacks on such. If "everything" he's posted is "sketchy and easily disproven" then you shouldn't have any trouble disproving it.

Again, i'd like to see some intelligent refutation on the giant skeletons.


Honibaz

Are you serious.?
There are no real 10 foot skeletons. There are reports, but nothing that has ever been verified and most of what is cited as "truth" is plain fiction.

Here is one refutation. but if you can some up with something half-way credible, I would be happy to look at it.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/ce/3/part2.html

here is another refutation. This time outright fraud.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1942995/posts


Anthropologists and historians accept it is possible that giants existed somewhere in our ancestry. However, there has never been any real, credible, concrete evidence. Many scientists believe that the "giants" were really just what we would call normally healthy people. The Vikings, for instance, had a much more varied diet than the average person on the English coast back then. Or, they might be references from smaller groups (pygmies exist today, even) to people we would call "normal" sized.

Or, they might just be war-time exaggerations. Who wants to go home to the sweetheart and brag about defeating the skinny, starved weakling?

[PLAYER57832]

Here is an example of why these issues drive real scientists up the wall. Notice that NONE of these citations are really referenced *they are all reports by a few idividuals), never have physical evidence and ALL are supposed to be suppressed soley due to some conspiracies.

http://biblefacts.org/myth/giant2.html

I want to note that these even aside from the physical evidence/verification issue, there are some other problems with these reports.