Moderator: Community Team
Anarkistsdream wrote:
I believe using random.org is stupid... It will be a random vote, obviously, but we can at least bother to make educated guesses before jumping to conclusions... True randomness is not what is called for here... Eductaed guesses, however, are very useful.
wicked wrote:I have a new strategy. I will vote the last person to post.![]()
unvote koolaidman
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Minkish wrote:for now Vote for dummies becasue of random.org. Until there is some more evidence, thats who my vote is for
viperbitex wrote: what the f*ck were the dinosaurs all about?? Did G-Dog wear his silly pants one day 10 million years ago and make them??
for dummies wrote:Minkish wrote:for now Vote for dummies becasue of random.org. Until there is some more evidence, thats who my vote is for
That is quite silly. You should at least wait and make sure no one slips up and says something stupid. Or you can base your vote off the way people played in previous games. even on the first day votes should have a little reason in them.
viperbitex wrote: what the f*ck were the dinosaurs all about?? Did G-Dog wear his silly pants one day 10 million years ago and make them??
Master Bush wrote:
unvote for dummies glad to see an early post. I also will fos minkish. He claims that his vote is from random.org, but who do we really know that? He could just be saying that, to cover him hoping on my bandwagon for dummies.
He's looking scummy.
We better hit it.wicked wrote:That's 50 posts per thread correct? Sure, we can aim for that.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users