Conquer Club

The Banishing of Woodruff?

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby Symmetry on Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:24 pm

thegreekdog wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:
Symmetry wrote:Quick question for theGreekDog. Were you in any way involved in Woodruff's ban? i note that you're clanmates with carpetman and barrackattack.


I was not as I was not a moderator when Woodruff was banned.

I'm in the McGill usergroup with those two, yes.


Cheers, have you dealt with any complaints from or against members of your clan?


Bullet Proof Bandits? No.

The usergroup McGill University? See question (original answer was yes).

Sorry Symm - Follow up question: What do you mean by "dealt with?"


Been involved with in your capacity as a moderator, say discussing a ban, or arguing against one.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby thegreekdog on Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:27 pm

Symmetry wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:
Symmetry wrote:Quick question for theGreekDog. Were you in any way involved in Woodruff's ban? i note that you're clanmates with carpetman and barrackattack.


I was not as I was not a moderator when Woodruff was banned.

I'm in the McGill usergroup with those two, yes.


Cheers, have you dealt with any complaints from or against members of your clan?


Bullet Proof Bandits? No.

The usergroup McGill University? See question (original answer was yes).

Sorry Symm - Follow up question: What do you mean by "dealt with?"


Been involved with in your capacity as a moderator, say discussing a ban, or arguing against one.


I've discussed bans or potential bans regarding people in the McGill usergroup. I've argued both for and against bans for people in the McGill usergroup.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby shieldgenerator7 on Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:35 pm

Neoteny wrote:Neoteny disagrees with you, so f*ck your coalition. I'm always right.


Is this intentional trolling?

If so, what purpsoe does this statement serve?

Is it a test to see who will flame you back?
Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to defeat all evil. -Ephesians 6 KJV

My Smiley: ( :) ) --- it's got SHIELDS!

everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
User avatar
Sergeant shieldgenerator7
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:59 am
Location: somewhere along my spiritual journey

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby Symmetry on Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:36 pm

1) Do you think that being clanmates with those people affected your decisions?

2) Do you think it could potentially affect decisions of other mods if they discussed such decisions with regards to members of their clan?

3) Would you ask a mod to remove themself from a discussion if you felt they had a vested interest?
Last edited by Symmetry on Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby Neoteny on Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:52 pm

BigBallinStalin wrote:
Neoteny wrote:Neoteny disagrees with you, so f*ck your coalition. I'm always right.


If I gave you a life-time supply of calcium, would you join my coalition?


Are you hitting on me?

shieldgenerator7 wrote:
Neoteny wrote:Neoteny disagrees with you, so f*ck your coalition. I'm always right.


Is this intentional trolling?

If so, what purpsoe does this statement serve?

Is it a test to see who will flame you back?


Are you hitting on me?
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
User avatar
Major Neoteny
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby pimpdave on Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:53 pm

Hey Neoteny, wanna get greased up and have a greco-roman wrestling competition at my place tonight?
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class pimpdave
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby shieldgenerator7 on Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:53 pm

Neoteny wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:
Neoteny wrote:Neoteny disagrees with you, so f*ck your coalition. I'm always right.


If I gave you a life-time supply of calcium, would you join my coalition?


Are you hitting on me?

shieldgenerator7 wrote:
Neoteny wrote:Neoteny disagrees with you, so f*ck your coalition. I'm always right.


Is this intentional trolling?

If so, what purpsoe does this statement serve?

Is it a test to see who will flame you back?


Are you hitting on me?


haha neotony you're a funny troll :lol: (except when you flame :ugeek: )

you still didn't answer my questions... :roll:
Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to defeat all evil. -Ephesians 6 KJV

My Smiley: ( :) ) --- it's got SHIELDS!

everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
User avatar
Sergeant shieldgenerator7
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:59 am
Location: somewhere along my spiritual journey

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby Aradhus on Mon Apr 02, 2012 3:00 pm

pimpdave wrote:
Aradhus wrote:How the f*ck can I have a counter argument when you've presented no evidence to your claims which amount to, having a great talent at spotting things other people can't.


Do you ever read the forum



That's a fucking laugh, coming from a guy who 90% of his posts are just baiting.
User avatar
Major Aradhus
 
Posts: 571
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:14 pm

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby Neoteny on Mon Apr 02, 2012 3:12 pm

pimpdave is such a sweet young man. You hooligans could learn a lot from him about successful interpersonal relationships.

To answer your question, my response expressed my actual opinion, just in an hyperbolic manner, and including the word "f*ck."
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
User avatar
Major Neoteny
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby BigBallinStalin on Mon Apr 02, 2012 3:13 pm

Neoteny wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:
Neoteny wrote:Neoteny disagrees with you, so f*ck your coalition. I'm always right.


If I gave you a life-time supply of calcium, would you join my coalition?


Are you hitting on me?



Don't worry. I love people regardless of their scientific orientation!
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby thegreekdog on Mon Apr 02, 2012 3:19 pm

Symmetry wrote:1) Do you think that being clanmates with those people affected your decisions?


No.

Symmetry wrote:2) Do you think it could potentially affect decisions of other mods if they discussed such decisions with regards to members of their clan?


Maybe. I can't speak for other moderators.

Symmetry wrote:3) Would you ask a mod to remove themself from a discussion if you felt they had a vested interest?


Yes. I've removed myself from disciplinary activities and discussions before. In all cases in which I've done so, it's because I'm arguing a particular point in a thread and feel that others would see me taking disciplinary action as influencing the course of the thread.

For example, if you and I are arguing about the color of the sky (you think it's blue, I think it's grey), and you have some potentially flaming comments, I won't participate in the discussions regarding your potential ban or non-ban.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby pimpdave on Mon Apr 02, 2012 3:23 pm

Considering how quick they are to ban me, I doubt it effects their decisions. Woodruff was going off on me for months before I finally dished it back a little. Within a week, I was banned for six months. I come back, and john9blue started calling me names fucking constantly for months. Mods didn't do shit. I just kept on not responding, while the guy just kept on going and going and going. Finally, after months, they ban him for one measly little week.

So if anything, they show preference to the people who aren't in McGill.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class pimpdave
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby john9blue on Mon Apr 02, 2012 3:30 pm

pimpdave wrote:Considering how quick they are to ban me, I doubt it effects their decisions. Woodruff was going off on me for months before I finally dished it back a little. Within a week, I was banned for six months. I come back, and john9blue started calling me names fucking constantly for months. Mods didn't do shit. I just kept on not responding, while the guy just kept on going and going and going. Finally, after months, they ban him for one measly little week.

So if anything, they show preference to the people who aren't in McGill.


yes, you are such a VICTIM LOL :lol: :lol:

nobody here thinks you're innocent at all, bro. you aren't fooling anyone.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Captain john9blue
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby pimpdave on Mon Apr 02, 2012 3:30 pm

It'd be nice if the rules were enforced equally.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class pimpdave
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby john9blue on Mon Apr 02, 2012 3:35 pm

it would be nice. you would have been banned at the same time i was due to your constant baiting and trolling (and for longer, since you insult entire groups of people and you are a repeat offender)
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Captain john9blue
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby pimpdave on Mon Apr 02, 2012 3:49 pm

Image
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class pimpdave
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby pimpdave on Mon Apr 02, 2012 3:51 pm

I don't go after anyone personally. I might criticize their ideas or lampoon their expression of them, but I don't go after the person. And I made it a point to not engage you at all.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class pimpdave
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby CreepersWiener on Mon Apr 02, 2012 6:57 pm

pimpdave wrote:I don't go after anyone personally. I might criticize their ideas or lampoon their expression of them, but I don't go after the person. And I made it a point to not engage you at all.


When Congresswoman Giffords got shot in the head in Arizona and other people got killed (including a nine year old girl), I quoted the father of Giffords as blaming the Tea Party. I just brought up the idea that the Tea Party ideology might have led to the shooting of Giffords. Also, the Palin targeting propaganda that had Giffords in the middle of a gun sight.

When I made the point of how inflammatory conservative rhetoric may be used as an excuse to start blowing away democrats and liberals, I got threatened by a mod (can't remember who) for targeting a GROUP OF PEOPLE. So, I deleted all my discussions and posts on that thread, and let everyone else debate, just because I got threatened with a ban.

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=135014&hilit=Arizona

If I happened to say the Klu Klux Klan was bad for the things they did or believe...would it have gotten the same treatment? They are a group of people too.

I don't see how pointing out the flaws in people's or groups of people's beliefs is considered flaming or targeting a group of people.

Note: Woodruff did have a good discussion going in that thread before it died off.
Army of GOD wrote:I joined this game because it's so similar to Call of Duty.
User avatar
Sergeant CreepersWiener
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:22 pm

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby john9blue on Mon Apr 02, 2012 7:53 pm

pimpdave wrote:I don't go after anyone personally. I might criticize their ideas or lampoon their expression of them, but I don't go after the person. And I made it a point to not engage you at all.


oh, so that makes it okay?

in that case, everyone whose name starts with "d" is a faggot, and everyone with an apple-related avatar has a 3 inch dick.

not like i'm calling out anyone in particular, though.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Captain john9blue
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby pimpdave on Mon Apr 02, 2012 8:07 pm

john9blue wrote:
pimpdave wrote:I don't go after anyone personally. I might criticize their ideas or lampoon their expression of them, but I don't go after the person. And I made it a point to not engage you at all.


oh, so that makes it okay?

in that case, everyone whose name starts with "d" is a faggot, and everyone with an apple-related avatar has a 3 inch dick.

not like i'm calling out anyone in particular, though.


Dude, calm down. Go after my ideas. That's the whole point. Call them stupid and idiotic and all of that. When you get back, that is.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class pimpdave
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby john9blue on Mon Apr 02, 2012 8:31 pm

pimpdave wrote:
Dude, calm down. Go after my ideas. That's the whole point. Call them stupid and idiotic and all of that. When you get back, that is.


since when do you go after ideas?

you go after people and the groups they identify with.

you constantly try to troll and it always fails because nobody genuinely believes the BS that you say about the tea party and whatnot.

P.S. "when i get back"? did you write another sob story to the mods that you "hate" so much to try and get me banned again? cute.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Captain john9blue
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby pimpdave on Mon Apr 02, 2012 8:57 pm

That word you posted is so serious one can't even write it as a typo on this website without getting banned. Just sayin'.
Last edited by pimpdave on Tue Apr 03, 2012 1:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class pimpdave
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby shieldgenerator7 on Mon Apr 02, 2012 9:01 pm

wow. baiting and flaming?

those two are from completely different worlds to me. I've seen it happen, but I've never been a part of it so I don't really understand the rift forming between good players like john9blue and pimpdave (who I'd miss just as much as AoG)

-SG7 ( :) )
Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to defeat all evil. -Ephesians 6 KJV

My Smiley: ( :) ) --- it's got SHIELDS!

everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
User avatar
Sergeant shieldgenerator7
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:59 am
Location: somewhere along my spiritual journey

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby army of nobunaga on Mon Apr 02, 2012 9:03 pm

like happens people.... I mean real life.. taht which most of you have never experienced.

woodruff is a teacher of men. I do not care his views.. his personality, he has a profession deemed by my gods as most honorable.... you other have chosen your paths.

Leave him alone ye men of little.
Maps Maps Maps!


Take part in this survey and possibly win an upgrade -->
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/embeddedform?formkey=dGg4a0VxUzJLb1NGNUFwZHBuOHRFZnc6MQ
User avatar
Cadet army of nobunaga
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:06 pm
Location: www.facebook.com/armyofnobu and Houston.

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

Postby john9blue on Mon Apr 02, 2012 9:16 pm

pimpdave wrote:That word you posted is so serious one can't even write it as a typo on this website. Just sayin'.


the problem here seems to be that you can dish it out, but you can't take it.

if you're genuinely offended by the fact that i used the word "faggot" for the sake of illustrating an example (which wasn't even addressed at you) then you need thicker skin.

that is, provided you actually were offended (which you weren't, you're just pretending to be offended again so that i can receive more punishment. reminds me of my little sister back when she was 6.)
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Captain john9blue
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: FlutterChi-town

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users